Prognostic Accuracy of Antenatal Doppler Ultrasound Measures in Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcomes for Pregnancies Complicated by Diabetes: A Systematic Review.
cerebral artery
cerebroplacental ratio
composite adverse outcome
fetal distress
gestational diabetes mellitus
hypoglycemia
neonatal
pulsatility index
type 1 diabetes mellitus
type 2 diabetes mellitus
umbilical artery
Journal
AJOG global reports
ISSN: 2666-5778
Titre abrégé: AJOG Glob Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101777907
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
medline:
3
7
2023
pubmed:
3
7
2023
entrez:
3
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to assess the prognostic accuracies of Doppler ultrasound measures in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes for pregnancies complicated with preexisting or gestational diabetes mellitus. An online database search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Emcare from inception to April 2022 was conducted. Studies reporting singleton, nonanomalous fetuses of women with either preexisting (type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus) or gestational diabetes mellitus during pregnancy were included. In addition, the included studies assessed cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery and/or umbilical artery pulsatility index in the prediction of either: preterm birth, cesarean delivery for fetal distress, APGAR (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration) score <7 at 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care unit admission (>24 hours), acute respiratory distress syndrome, jaundice, hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, or neonatal death. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed and 610 articles were identified, of which 15 were included. Two authors independently extracted prognostic data from each article and assessed the study applicability and risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) scoring criteria. A total of 15 studies were included in the review and comprised prospective (n=10; 66%) and retrospective (n=5; 33%) cohorts. Sensitivity and positive predictive values varied widely across each Doppler measurement. Umbilical artery sensitivities were higher than those of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery for hypoglycemia, jaundice, neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress, and preterm birth. Cerebroplacental ratio was the most reported index test; however, prognostic accuracy was worse than that of umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery Doppler across all adverse perinatal outcomes. Significant risk of bias was present in 14 (94%) studies, with substantial heterogeneity observed across studies in terms of study design and outcomes assessed. Abnormal umbilical artery pulsatility index may be of more clinical value in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes compared with cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index in diabetic pregnancies. Further evaluation of umbilical artery Doppler measurements in diabetic pregnancies using standardized variables across studies is required for broader clinical application. The significant association between abnormal Doppler measurement and hypoglycemia may warrant further investigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37396341
doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100241
pii: S2666-5778(23)00082-5
pmc: PMC10310483
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
100241Informations de copyright
Crown Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Références
J Perinat Med. 1987;15(6):545-53
pubmed: 3452636
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;211(3):288.e1-5
pubmed: 24813969
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):e049799
pubmed: 34857564
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jul;101(7):787-793
pubmed: 35441701
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;24(5):534-7
pubmed: 15386601
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Feb;168(2):645-52
pubmed: 8438946
J Nephrol. 2020 Oct;33(5):1079-1089
pubmed: 32889637
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 May 26;5:19
pubmed: 15918898
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;52(4):430-441
pubmed: 29920817
Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2022 Feb 18;13:37-41
pubmed: 35210900
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;52(3):340-346
pubmed: 28594099
Neonatology. 2009;95(2):105-16
pubmed: 18776724
J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Nov;41(11):2767-2774
pubmed: 35174894
N Engl J Med. 2008 May 8;358(19):1991-2002
pubmed: 18463375
JAMA. 1999 Sep 15;282(11):1054-60
pubmed: 10493204
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;51(3):313-322
pubmed: 28708272
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):7929-7935
pubmed: 34151683
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36
pubmed: 22007046
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 5th Sep;129(17):2109-14
pubmed: 27569240
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 Aug;43(4):302-6
pubmed: 14714716
Placenta. 2017 Jun;54:68-75
pubmed: 28216258
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993 May;49(3):161-8
pubmed: 8405630
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;50(2):200-206
pubmed: 27549587
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Apr;211:56-61
pubmed: 28189724
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Dec;60(6):E18-E52
pubmed: 33200400
BMC Med. 2020 Apr 7;18(1):63
pubmed: 32252740
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6(4):650-9
pubmed: 23573311
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 13;6:CD007529
pubmed: 28613398
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2015;36(2):101-5
pubmed: 26071574
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Apr;166(4):1287-93
pubmed: 1566786
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Nov;27(17):1776-81
pubmed: 24397275
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2001;51(3):173-7
pubmed: 11306904
Ultraschall Med. 2020 Dec;41(6):675-680
pubmed: 30396217