Impact of minimal residual disease standardised assessment by FDG-PET/CT in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma enrolled in the imaging sub-study of the FORTE trial.
Complete metabolic response (CMR)
FDG-PET/CT
Minimal residual disease (MRD)
Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC)
Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM)
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
15
02
2023
revised:
03
05
2023
accepted:
08
05
2023
medline:
3
7
2023
pubmed:
3
7
2023
entrez:
3
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
18F-FDG-PET/CT is the current standard technique to define minimal residual disease (MRD) outside the bone marrow (BM) in multiple myeloma (MM), recently standardised applying the Deauville scores (DS) to focal lesions (FS) and bone marrow uptake (BMS) and defining the complete metabolic response (CMR) as uptake below the liver background (DS <4). In this analysis, we aimed at confirming the role of CMR, and complementarity with BM multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) at 10 At B, 93% of patients had focal lesions within the bones (FS ≥4 in 89%) and 99% increased BM uptake (BMS ≥4 in 61%). At PM, CMR was achieved in 63% of patients, which was a strong predictor for prolonged PFS in univariate analysis at landmark time PM (HR 0.40, We herein confirm the applicability and validity of DS criteria to define CMR and its prognostic relevance and complementarity with MFC at the BM level. Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Italian Ministry of Health (RC-2022-2773423).
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
18F-FDG-PET/CT is the current standard technique to define minimal residual disease (MRD) outside the bone marrow (BM) in multiple myeloma (MM), recently standardised applying the Deauville scores (DS) to focal lesions (FS) and bone marrow uptake (BMS) and defining the complete metabolic response (CMR) as uptake below the liver background (DS <4).
Methods
UNASSIGNED
In this analysis, we aimed at confirming the role of CMR, and complementarity with BM multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) at 10
Findings
UNASSIGNED
At B, 93% of patients had focal lesions within the bones (FS ≥4 in 89%) and 99% increased BM uptake (BMS ≥4 in 61%). At PM, CMR was achieved in 63% of patients, which was a strong predictor for prolonged PFS in univariate analysis at landmark time PM (HR 0.40,
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
We herein confirm the applicability and validity of DS criteria to define CMR and its prognostic relevance and complementarity with MFC at the BM level.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Italian Ministry of Health (RC-2022-2773423).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37396807
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102017
pii: S2589-5370(23)00194-3
pmc: PMC10314158
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
102017Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
EZ receives honoraria from Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Takeda. SO has received honoraria from Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen; has served on the advisory boards for Adaptive Biotechnologies, Janssen, Amgen, and Takeda. FG has received honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, and GlaxoSmithKline; has served on the advisory boards for Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Oncopeptides, bluebird bio, and Pfizer. MD has received honoraria for lectures from GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, and Janssen; has served on the advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, and Bristol Myers Squibb. AB has served on the advisory board for Amgen, Janssen, Takeda, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline. MGa has received honoraria from Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline. RZ has served on the advisory boards for Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer. BG has received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Takeda; has served on the advisory boards for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda. AV received honoraria from Novartis, Advanced Accelerator Applications and GE Healthcare. FP receives honoraria and travel accommodation support from Celgene, Janssen, Takeda and has served on the advisory boards for Celgene BMS, Janssen, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline. PT has received honoraria from Janssen, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Takeda, AbbVie, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer; has served on the data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards for Janssen, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Amgen. KM has received honoraria from Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Sanofi, Janssen. MB has received honoraria from Sanofi, Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AbbVie; has served on the advisory boards for Janssen and GlaxoSmithKline; has received research funding from Sanofi, Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Mundipharma. PM has received honoraria from and/or served on scientific boards for AbbVie, Alexion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astellas, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Janssen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda. MC has received honoraria from Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, AbbVie, Sanofi, Pfizer, and Adaptive Biotechnologies; has served on the advisory boards for Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer; has served on the speakers’ bureaus for Janssen, Celgene, and Sanofi. CN has been PET revisor for Keosys-Sanofi. The other authors declare no competing financial interests.
Références
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Dec;22(12):1705-1720
pubmed: 34774221
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;35(25):2911-2918
pubmed: 28686535
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2016 Jan;90(1):26-30
pubmed: 25907102
Blood. 2018 Jul 5;132(1):59-66
pubmed: 29784643
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Apr 09;6:69
pubmed: 31024917
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 1;21(19):4384-90
pubmed: 26078390
Blood. 2009 Sep 3;114(10):2068-76
pubmed: 19443657
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2016 Jan;90(1):31-9
pubmed: 25619868
Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):5-13
pubmed: 30806604
Blood Adv. 2020 Dec 8;4(23):5988-5999
pubmed: 33284948
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):e328-e346
pubmed: 27511158
Blood. 2019 Feb 14;133(7):644-651
pubmed: 30587527
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 May;45(5):712-719
pubmed: 29270787
J Nucl Med. 2019 Mar;60(3):348-352
pubmed: 30389821
Blood Cancer J. 2021 Jun 3;11(6):106
pubmed: 34083504
Blood. 2013 Mar 7;121(10):1819-23
pubmed: 23305732
Blood. 2017 Jul 6;130(1):30-34
pubmed: 28432222
Br J Haematol. 2021 Aug;194(3):496-507
pubmed: 33724461
Nat Commun. 2017 Aug 16;8(1):268
pubmed: 28814763
Haematologica. 2019 Sep;104(9):e420-e423
pubmed: 30765474
Haematologica. 2018 Jun;103(6):1047-1053
pubmed: 29567784
Ann Oncol. 2021 Mar;32(3):309-322
pubmed: 33549387
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Apr;18(4):e206-e217
pubmed: 28368259
Am J Hematol. 2019 Aug;94(8):853-861
pubmed: 31074033
Blood Adv. 2021 Jul 13;5(13):2753-2759
pubmed: 34242392
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Apr 15;23(8):1981-1987
pubmed: 27698001
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 10;38(8):784-792
pubmed: 31770060
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Feb;42(2):328-54
pubmed: 25452219
Blood. 2011 Dec 1;118(23):5989-95
pubmed: 21900189
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 10;39(2):116-125
pubmed: 33151787