Developing multisectoral strategies to promote evidence-based practice in rehabilitation: findings from an end-of-grant knowledge translation symposium.

Rehabilitation practice end of the grant evidence-based practice integrated knowledge translation

Journal

Disability and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1464-5165
Titre abrégé: Disabil Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9207179

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jul 2023
Historique:
medline: 3 7 2023
pubmed: 3 7 2023
entrez: 3 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Following a longitudinal study to understand how evidence-based practice evolves during the initial years of occupational therapy (OT) and physiotherapy (PT) practice, we held an end-of-grant symposium with representatives from education, practice, research, and policy. The objectives were to: (1) elicit feedback on the implications of the study results; and (2) co-develop a list of actionable recommendations for each sector. Qualitative participatory approach. The symposium was held over two half days and consisted of a presentation of study findings, a discussion on the implications of the research for each sector and future recommendations. Discussions were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. The themes related to implications of the longitudinal study included: (1) A need to rethink what evidence-based practice (EBP) really is; (2) How to practice EBP; and (3) The continuing challenge of measuring EBP. The co-development of actionable recommendations resulted in nine strategies. This study highlighted how we may collectively promote EBP competencies in future OTs and PTs. We generated sector-specific avenues that may be pursued to promote EBP and argued for the importance of pooling efforts from the four sectors so that we may achieve the intended ethos of EBP.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThere is a need to revisit the definition of evidence-based practice (EBP) and the traditional 3-circle model in rehabilitation to include a broader conceptualization of what constitutes evidence.We recommend using EBP measures as tools for self-reflection and professional development that can support practitioners to be reflective and accountable evidence-based practitioners.Optimal promotion of EBP competencies in occupational therapists and physiotherapists should rest upon collaborative efforts from the education, practice, research, and policy sectors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37399539
doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2227565
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-12

Auteurs

Aliki Thomas (A)

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy and Institute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.

Jacqueline Roberge-Dao (J)

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Muhammad Zafar Iqbal (MZ)

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Research Department, Acuity Insights, Toronto, Canada.

Nancy M Salbach (NM)

Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Lori Jean Letts (LJ)

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Helene J Polatajko (HJ)

Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Susan Rappolt (S)

Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Richard Debigaré (R)

Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.

Sara Ahmed (S)

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

André Bussières (A)

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada.

Margo Paterson (M)

School of rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Annie Rochette (A)

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.
School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Classifications MeSH