Morphological anomalies in hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) from Brazil.
Amblyomma
Gynandromorphism
Neotropical region
Rhipicephalus
Journal
Ticks and tick-borne diseases
ISSN: 1877-9603
Titre abrégé: Ticks Tick Borne Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101522599
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2023
11 2023
Historique:
received:
17
04
2023
revised:
13
06
2023
accepted:
16
06
2023
medline:
27
9
2023
pubmed:
4
7
2023
entrez:
3
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tick abnormalities have been unusual in nature, and they can be divided into local and general. In the present study, external morphological anomalies were described in 31 individual adult ticks of 15 different species of Ixodidae, which were collected on wild hosts (20 ticks), domestic hosts (7 ticks), and in the environment (4 ticks) in 11 states of Brazil from 1998 to 2022. Among the 31 tick specimens, 14 (45%) were categorized as local anomalies, and 17 (55%) as general anomalies. The ticks were taxonomically identified into 14 species of Amblyomma, and one species of Rhipicephalus. Local anomalies included malformations of scutum/alloscutum, ectromely, leg atrophy, and a third ectopic spiracular plate. General anomalies included opisthosoma duplication, no expansion of dorsal alloscutum in engorged females, and gynandromorphism; the latter is described for 13 tick specimens. Morphological anomalies in Amblyomma aureolatum, Amblyomma brasiliense, Amblyomma humerale and Amblyomma longirostre are reported for the first time. Although the results herein expand the list of anomalous tick species in the Neotropics, future studies should be conducted to clarify the origin of these anomalies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37399629
pii: S1877-959X(23)00100-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102219
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102219Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier GmbH.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest