Postoperative Outcomes After Tympanoplasty for Active Versus Inactive Otitis Media Patients With Tympanic Membrane Perforation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Journal
Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
ISSN: 1537-4505
Titre abrégé: Otol Neurotol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100961504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2023
01 Aug 2023
Historique:
medline:
17
7
2023
pubmed:
4
7
2023
entrez:
3
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare postoperative tympanoplasty outcomes between active versus inactive otitis media (OM) patients with tympanic membrane perforation. Medline via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for studies published from inception to March 1, 2023. Studies of 15- to 60-year-old patients undergoing microscopic/endoscopic myringoplasty using underlay/overlay technique with reported postoperative mean hearing gain and graft uptake were included. Studies requiring simultaneous surgical procedures, reporting patients with comorbidities and with non-English full text articles were excluded. Articles were independently screened by two researchers with data extracted according to a predetermined proforma in Microsoft Excel. Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment was used for risk of bias evaluation of randomized studies and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions for nonrandomized studies. Similar studies were pooled for meta-analysis using the inverse variance random effects model to calculate the mean difference and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for mean hearing gain and DerSimonian and Laird random effects model for graft uptake. Thirty-three studies comprising 2,373 patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, seven were pooled for meta-analysis. Included articles showed inactive OM patients have higher average postoperative mean hearing gain of 10.84 dB and graft uptake of 88.7% compared to active OM patients (9.15 dB and 84.2%). Meta-analysis of mean hearing gain (MD, -0.76 dB; 95% CI, -2.11 to 0.60; p = 0.27, moderate certainty) and graft uptake (OD, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.34-1.09; p = 0.10, moderate certainty) have an overall p value >0.05. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative mean hearing gain and graft uptake between active and inactive OM patients undergoing tympanoplasty. Hence, tympanoplasty procedures should not be postponed solely because of patients' preoperative ear discharge status.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37400232
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003940
pii: 00129492-990000000-00326
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
643-650Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.
Références
Sarkar S. A review on the history of tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;65(Suppl 3):455–60.
Saidha P, Kapoor S, Suri A, Gupta A, Kakkar V. Evaluation of the role of middle ear risk index as a prognostic tool in cases of tympanoplasty in chronic suppurative otitis media. International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology And Head And Neck Surgery 2021;7:622–6.
Hom DB. The wound healing response to grafted tissues. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994;27:13–24.
Kirti YK, Yashveer JK. Dilemmas in Current Management of Complicated Chronic Otitis Media. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;71:155–60.
Ruohola A, Heikkinen T, Meurman O, et al. Antibiotic treatment of acute otorrhea through tympanostomy tube: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study with daily follow-up. Pediatrics 2003;111(5 Pt 1):1061–7.
Stewart MG, Coker NJ, Jenkins HA, Manolidis S, Bautista MH. Outcomes and Quality of Life in Conductive Hearing Loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:527–32.
Dhanya . T, S. N., M.K. Rajasekar. (2021). A Comparative Study of Myringoplasty In Dry and Wet Ear. Annals of R.S.C.B.
Pothala H, Shukla SC, Khan W, Ramalingam R, Ramalingam KK. A prospective comparative study between dry and wet tympanoplasty. Annals of Otology and Neurotology 2018;1:083–8.
Umamaheswara Rao S, Siva Subba Rao Pakanati KSR, Chandramouli S. Myringoplasty in wet and dry ears: an observational study in a tertiary care center . International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery; 2021.
Santosh UP, Prashanth KB, Rao MS. Study of myringoplasty in wet and dry ears in mucosal type of chronic otitis media. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:MC01–3.
Sundararajan V, Prabhakar Rao Y, Stephenson B. A comparative study of microscopic myringoplasty and endoscopic myringoplasty in patients with mucosal type of chronic otitis media. Indian journal of otology 2019;25:81–4.
Tasleem M, Rahman A, Aslam M. Comparative Study of Outcome of Endoscopic Myringoplasty in Active and Inactive Mucosal Chronic Otitis Media Patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;69:319–22.
Thirumalaipriya V. A Descriptive study of the Surgical Outcome of Myringoplasty between the Active and Inactive Ear in Tubotympanic Type of Chronic Otitis Media in a Tertiary Care Hospital . Kanchipuram: Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre; 2020.
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4898.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016;355:i4919.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924–6.
Higgins JPT, Li T, Deeks JJ (editors). Chapter 6: Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook .
Desai PS, Harugop AS, Hajare PS, Somashekar A. Changing Scenario in Tympanoplasty: Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Approach. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022;74(Suppl 1):234–40.
Murugendrappa MA, Siddappa PN, Shambulingegowda A, Basavaraj GP. Comparative study of two different myringoplasty techniques in mucosal type of chronic otitis media. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:MC01–3.
Panchal V, Gulia JS, Yadav SPS, et al. To evaluate and compare the results of over-underlay graft technique with conventional underlay myringoplasty. Indian journal of otology 2015;21:274–9.
Saraf A, Manhas M, Jamwal PS, Begh RA, Kalsotra P. Comparative Study of Overlay and Underlay Techniques of Myringoplasty-Our Experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022;74(Suppl 1):426–32.
Yang Q, Wang B, Zhang J, et al. Comparison of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty in patients with chronic otitis media. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022;279:4801–7.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.
Dwivedi N, Jain S, Kumar A. The outcome of tympanic membrane grafting medial or lateral to malleus handle in type i underlay tympanoplasty. Indian journal of otology 2021;27:180–4.
Kumar M, Kanaujia SK, Singh A. A comparative study of endoscopic myringoplasty vs conventional myringoplasty. Otorhinolaryngology Clinics 2015;7:132–7.
Ramakrishnan A, Panda NK, Mohindra S, Munjal S. Cortical mastoidectomy in surgery of tubotympanic disease. Are we overdoing it? Surgeon 2011;9:22–6.
Atchariyasathian V, Suwannajak R, Plodpai Y, Pitathawatchai P. A comparison of endoscopic transtympanic myringoplasty and endoscopic type I tympanoplasty for repairing medium- to large-sized tympanic membrane perforation: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020;277:2199–207.
Lou Z, Lou Z, Jin K, Sun J, Chen Z. Comparison of long-term outcome of two endoscopic transtympanic myringoplasty without tympanomeatal flap elevating for repairing large chronic perforations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022;279:2293–301.
Mahawerawat K, Kasemsiri P. Comparison of the clinical outcome of endoscopic push-through myringoplasty and microscopic overlay myringoplasty: matching co-variated designs. BMC Surg 2022;22:44.
Albu S, Trabalzini F, Amadori M. Usefulness of cortical mastoidectomy in myringoplasty. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:604–9.
Mohan C, Bhardwaj P, Srivastava A. Comparative Evaluation of Outcome of Type I Tympanoplasty with and without Cortical Mastoidectomy In Treatment of Inactive Mucosal Type of Chronic Otitis Media. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-Jemds 2015;4:8129–34.
Singh M, Rai A, Bandyopadhyay S, Gupta SC. Comparative study of the underlay and overlay techniques of myringoplasty in large and subtotal perforations of the tympanic membrane. J Laryngol Otol 2003;117:444–8.
Kadah SMS, Mokhemar SM, Ibrahim HA, Ibrahim HE. Impact of mastoidectomy on tympanoplasty for recurrent suppurative otitis media. Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology 2019;35:168–72.
He D, Shou Z, Hsieh Y, et al. Endoscopic tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy for active mucosal chronic otitis media with mastoid and tympanic antrum lesions: A prospective clinical study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2019;81(5–6):287–93.
Shaikh AA, Onali MAS, Shaikh SM, Rafi T. Outcome of tympanoplasty type-I by underlay technique. Journal of the Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences 2009;8:80–4. Retrieved from http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed11&NEWS=N&AN=354976960 .
Bahjat MAW, Al-Sabaawe IAS. Comparative Study between Endoscopic Myringoplasty and Conventional Method (Underlay Technique). Iraqi Medical Journal 2016;62:80–5.
Maiti AB, Sinha R. Tympanoplasty for Wet and Dry Perforation: A Prospective Comparative Study. Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery 2020;28:260–5.
Choi S-W, Kim H, Na H-S, et al. Comparison of Medial Underlay and Lateral Underlay Endoscopic Type I Tympanoplasty for Anterior Perforations of the Tympanic Membrane. Otol Neurotol 2021;42:1177–83.
Shakya D, Kc A, Tamang N, Nepal A. Endoscopic versus microscopic type-I cartilage tympanoplasty for anterior perforation - a comparative study. Acta Otolaryngol 2021;141:135–40.
Bhatia K, Vaid L, Taneja HC. Effect of Type 1 Tympanoplasty on the Quality of Life of CSOM Patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;68:468–74.
SV Bhise, P. M. H., SS Kamble, D. Rohe. (2017). Comparative study of type I tympanoplasty in dry and wet ear. MedPulse International Journal of ENT.
Mahamud M, Aich ML, Al Mamun A, Alam R. Evaluation of hearing status after type I tympanoplasty. Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 2018;24:50–5. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000513929400008.
Mahmud MK, Alam MM, Islam MM, et al. Comparison of Surgical Outcome between Endoscopic and Microscopic Type 1 Tympanoplasty. Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 2020;26:109–15. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000598560100006.
Rajguru R, Bedi TS, Rajguru G. Is endoscopic tympanoplasty an alternative to microscopic tympanoplasty for small central perforations? A study. Indian journal of otology 2022;28:310–3.
Booth JB. Myringoplasty. The lessons of failure. J Laryngol Otol 1974;88:1223–36.
Gibb AG, Chang SK. Myringoplasty (A review of 365 operations). J Laryngol Otol 1982;96:915–30.
Tos M. Late Results in Tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 1974;100:302–5.
Gersdorff M, Garin P, Decat M, Juantegui M. Myringoplasty: Long-Term Results in Adults and Children. Am J Otol 1995;16:532–5.
Adkins WY, White B. Type I tympanoplasty: influencing factors. Laryngoscope 1984;94:916–8.
Sadé J, Berco E, Brown M, Weinberg J, Avraham S. Myringoplasty: short and long-term results in a training program. J Laryngol Otol 1981;95:653–65.
Caylan R, Titiz A, Falcioni M, et al. Myringoplasty in Children: Factors Influencing Surgical Outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;118:709–13.
Emir H, Ceylan K, Kizilkaya Z, et al. Success is a matter of experience: type 1 tympanoplasty : influencing factors on type 1 tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007;264:595–9.
Gangwar A, Kuchhal V. A comparison of postoperative hearing gain in dry and wet ear tympanoplasty. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2016;5:2614–7.
Vijayendra H, Rangam CK, Sangeeta R. Comparative study of tympanoplasty in wet perforation v/s totally dry perforation in tubotympanic disease. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;58:165–7.
Reeves BC, Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, et al. Chapter 24: Including non-randomized studies on intervention effects. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022) . Cochrane; 2022. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook .