Field evaluation of a point-of-care triage test for active tuberculosis (TriageTB).
Biomarker
Biosignature
Non-sputum based screening
TB
Tuberculosis
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jul 2023
03 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
14
03
2023
accepted:
22
05
2023
medline:
5
7
2023
pubmed:
4
7
2023
entrez:
3
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To improve tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has called for a non-sputum based triage test to focus TB testing on people with a high likelihood of having active pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Various host or pathogen biomarker-based testing devices are in design stage and require validity assessment. Host biomarkers have shown promise to accurately rule out active TB, but further research is required to determine generalisability. The TriageTB diagnostic test study aims to assess the accuracy of diagnostic test candidates, as well as field-test, finalise the design and biomarker signature, and validate a point-of-care multi-biomarker test (MBT). This observational diagnostic study will evaluate sensitivity and specificity of biomarker-based diagnostic candidates including the MBT and Xpert® TB Fingerstick cartridge compared with a gold-standard composite TB outcome classification defined by symptoms, sputum GeneXpert® Ultra, smear and culture, radiological features, response to TB therapy and presence of an alternative diagnosis. The study will be conducted in research sites in South Africa, Uganda, The Gambia and Vietnam which all have high TB prevalence. The two-phase design allows for finalisation of the MBT in Phase 1 in which candidate host proteins will be evaluated on stored serum from Asia, South Africa and South America and on fingerstick blood from 50 newly recruited participants per site. The MBT test will then be locked down and validated in Phase 2 on 250 participants per site. By targeting confirmatory TB testing to those with a positive triage test, 75% of negative GXPU may be avoided, thereby reducing diagnostic costs and patient losses during the care cascade. This study builds on previous biomarker research and aims to identify a point-of-care test meeting or exceeding the minimum World Health Organisation target product profile of a 90% sensitivity and 70% specificity. Streamlining TB testing by identifying individuals with a high likelihood of TB should improve TB resources use and, in so doing, improve TB care. NCT04232618 (clinicaltrials.gov) Date of registration: 16 January 2020.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To improve tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has called for a non-sputum based triage test to focus TB testing on people with a high likelihood of having active pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Various host or pathogen biomarker-based testing devices are in design stage and require validity assessment. Host biomarkers have shown promise to accurately rule out active TB, but further research is required to determine generalisability. The TriageTB diagnostic test study aims to assess the accuracy of diagnostic test candidates, as well as field-test, finalise the design and biomarker signature, and validate a point-of-care multi-biomarker test (MBT).
METHODS
METHODS
This observational diagnostic study will evaluate sensitivity and specificity of biomarker-based diagnostic candidates including the MBT and Xpert® TB Fingerstick cartridge compared with a gold-standard composite TB outcome classification defined by symptoms, sputum GeneXpert® Ultra, smear and culture, radiological features, response to TB therapy and presence of an alternative diagnosis. The study will be conducted in research sites in South Africa, Uganda, The Gambia and Vietnam which all have high TB prevalence. The two-phase design allows for finalisation of the MBT in Phase 1 in which candidate host proteins will be evaluated on stored serum from Asia, South Africa and South America and on fingerstick blood from 50 newly recruited participants per site. The MBT test will then be locked down and validated in Phase 2 on 250 participants per site.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
By targeting confirmatory TB testing to those with a positive triage test, 75% of negative GXPU may be avoided, thereby reducing diagnostic costs and patient losses during the care cascade. This study builds on previous biomarker research and aims to identify a point-of-care test meeting or exceeding the minimum World Health Organisation target product profile of a 90% sensitivity and 70% specificity. Streamlining TB testing by identifying individuals with a high likelihood of TB should improve TB resources use and, in so doing, improve TB care.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
NCT04232618 (clinicaltrials.gov) Date of registration: 16 January 2020.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37400753
doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08342-5
pii: 10.1186/s12879-023-08342-5
pmc: PMC10318779
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04232618']
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
447Subventions
Organisme : South African Medical Research Council
ID : SAMRC Code 57048
Organisme : European Union
ID : RIA2018D-2499 - TriageTB
Organisme : European Union
ID : RIA2018D-2499 - TriageTB
Organisme : European Union
ID : RIA2018D-2499 - TriageTB
Organisme : European Union
ID : RIA2018D-2499 - TriageTB
Organisme : European Union
ID : RIA2018D-2499 - TriageTB
Organisme : European Union
ID : RIA2018D-2499 - TriageTB
Investigateurs
Andriëtte Hiemstra
(A)
Susanne Tonsing
(S)
Gerard Tromp
(G)
Muyiwa Owolabi
(M)
Joseph Mendy
(J)
Awa Gindeh
(A)
Amadou Barry
(A)
Georgetta Mbayo
(G)
Julia Buech
(J)
Malte Streitz
(M)
Sophie Nalukwago
(S)
Ann Ritah Namuganga
(AR)
Dorcas Lamunu
(D)
Michael Odie
(M)
Louise Pierneef
(L)
Anouk van Hooij
(A)
Morten Ruhwald
(M)
John Belisle
(J)
Karen Dobos
(K)
Mark Hatherill
(M)
Thomas Scriba
(T)
Jill Winter
(J)
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 21;(1):CD009593
pubmed: 24448973
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jun 26;10:1441
pubmed: 31297103
Thorax. 2016 Sep;71(9):785-94
pubmed: 27146200
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 17;18(1):973
pubmed: 30558670
Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2017 Dec;107:48-58
pubmed: 29050771
iScience. 2023 Jan 20;26(1):105873
pubmed: 36590898
Sci Rep. 2020 May 25;10(1):8629
pubmed: 32451443
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 8;8(1):2675
pubmed: 29422548
Front Immunol. 2021 Feb 26;12:607827
pubmed: 33717089
Oncotarget. 2016 Sep 6;7(36):57581-57592
pubmed: 27557501
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jul;18(7):e199-e210
pubmed: 29580818
BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 20;12:10
pubmed: 22260319
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 May 1;197(9):1198-1208
pubmed: 29624071
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Dec;7(12):1163-71
pubmed: 14677891
iScience. 2020 Dec 29;24(1):102006
pubmed: 33490914
BMC Pulm Med. 2009 May 16;9:21
pubmed: 19445695