Vaccine Hesitancy in India: Facilitators and Inhibitors.

3Cs model Demographics Fatalism Health Belief Model Hierarchical regression analysis Religious fatalism Vaccine hesitancy

Journal

Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education
ISSN: 1552-6127
Titre abrégé: Health Educ Behav
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9704962

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2023
Historique:
medline: 13 11 2023
pubmed: 4 7 2023
entrez: 4 7 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

COVID-19 is yet not completely over; however, many people are hesitant to take COVID-19 vaccines despite their availability. Vaccine hesitancy is a major roadblock to attaining normalcy and controlling the spread of the COVID-19 virus. The present research used a multitheoretical framework (Health Belief Model, 3Cs framework, fatalism, and religious fatalism) to comprehend the complexity of vaccine hesitancy. Thus, the present study aimed at exploring vaccine hesitancy in India by using key components of the Health Belief Model, 3Cs framework, fatalism, religious fatalism, and some demographics as predictors. Data were collected electronically with the help of Google Forms from 639 Indian adults following snowballing and convenience sampling techniques with standardized measures (albeit some modifications to suit the context of the study). Descriptive analysis and hierarchical regression analysis were run in SPSS (V-22) to analyze the data. Results revealed that participants of the present study scored relatively high on vaccine hesitancy. Muslims as compared with Hindus and vaccination status emerged as significant predictors of vaccine hesitancy out of the demographic factors. Fear of COVID-19, vaccine convenience, and religious fatalism also significantly predicted vaccine hesitancy. Thus, a comprehensive approach is needed to strategically use these predictors to control vaccine hesitancy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37401790
doi: 10.1177/10901981231179503
doi:

Substances chimiques

COVID-19 Vaccines 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

822-834

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Heena Parveen (H)

Department of Psychology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.

Shagufta Nasir (S)

Amity Institute of Clinical Psychology, Amity University, Rajasthan Jaipur, India.

Md Ghazi Shahnawaz (MG)

Department of Psychology, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.

Fatema Husain (F)

Faculty of Education, Monash University, Australia.

Juweria Baig (J)

School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Linguistic Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Anand Shankar (A)

Department of Psychology, Tilka Manjhi University, Bhagalpur, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH