Evaluation of Atmospheric Conditions Leading to a Fumigation Event.
Journal
Health physics
ISSN: 1538-5159
Titre abrégé: Health Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985093R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2023
01 10 2023
Historique:
medline:
6
9
2023
pubmed:
4
7
2023
entrez:
4
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
During the afternoon of 30 January 2022, the Savannah River Site experienced unusual temperature conditions leading to a fumigation event that triggered safety alarms and caused considerable confusion about the cause of the event. Normally, it is assumed that fumigation events occur early in the day once surface heating has begun. While most fumigation events are related to the breakup of a nocturnal inversion, this event was related to synoptic atmospheric conditions, which provided a more unique scenario that led to the fumigation event. The unusual synoptic atmospheric conditions led to the downwash and fumigation of the elevated plume, causing a pollutant to mix rapidly to the surface. These conditions could have potentially harmed workers within the facility, since the plume was directed toward a building air intake system. We seek to outline the conditions that led to this unusual fumigation event and provide results of two-dimensional (2D) wind modeling of the event to characterize these conditions for future operational guidance of the facility air intake systems. This work sets the groundwork for future high-resolution modeling to explore the mechanisms and thresholds affecting fumigation on the facility-specific short distance scales and improve forecasting of non-standard fumigation events to protect human health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37401891
doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001715
pii: 00004032-990000000-00096
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
305-311Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Health Physics Society.
Références
Bierly EW, Hewson EW. Some restricitve meteorological conditions to be considered in the design of stacks. J Appl Met 1:383–390; 1962.
Cain SA, Maroti LA, Lin F. Prediction of stack plume downwash using computational fluid dynamics. In: Proceedings of the AMSE/JSME 4 th Joint Fluids Summer Engineering Conference New York, NY: AMSE;. FEDSM2003-45183; 2003: 1353–1361.
Cizek J, Nozicka J. Cooling tower plume. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. Melville, NY: AIP Publishing;. 1768; 2016: 1768.
Feng L, Yang T, Wang D, Wang Z, Pan Y, Matsui I, Chen Y, Xin J, Huang H. Identify the contribution of elevated industrial plume to ground air quality by optical and machine learning methods. Env Res Comm 2:021005; 2020. DOI:10.1088/2515-7620/ab7634.
doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/ab7634
Hossain M. Fate and transport of stack emissions in the environment and potential reduction of pollutants in the context of global warming. J Env Eng 149:04022080; 2022. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0002078.
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0002078
Mushtaq R, Bandh SA, Shafi S. Air pollution and its abatement. In: Environmental management. New York: Springer; 2020: 47–93.
Ramsdell JV Jr, Simonen CA, Smyth SB, Lee JY. Atmospheric relative concentrations in building wakes. NUREG/CR-6331 [online]. 1997. Available at https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1721/ML17213A190.pdf . Accessed 1 May 2023.
Segal M, Pielke RA. On the evaluation of the mixing layer during elevated plume fumigation. J Air Pol Con Assoc 33:1190–1192; 1983.
Sivanandan H, Kishore VR, Goel M, Asthana A. A study on plume dispersion characteristics of two discrete plume stacks for negative temperature gradient conditions. Env Model Assess 26:405–422; 2021.
Warren CJ, Paine RJ, Connors JA, Szembek C, Knipping E. Evaluation of a revised AERMOD treatment of plume disperison in the daytime elevated stable layer. J Air Waste Man Assoc 72:1040–1052; 2022. DOI:10.1080/10962247.2022.2094031.
doi: 10.1080/10962247.2022.2094031
Weinbeck SW, Viner BJ, Rivera-Giboyeaux AM. Meteorological monitoring program. Aiken, SC: SRNL; SRNL-TR-2020-00197; 2020.
US Environmental Protection Agency. AERMOD: Model formation and evaluation. Washington, DC: US EPA; EPA-454/R-19-014; 2019.