Who supports drug-checking services in Australia? An analysis of 2019 National Drug Strategy Household Survey data.
Australia
drug checking
pill testing
policy
social attitudes
Journal
Drug and alcohol review
ISSN: 1465-3362
Titre abrégé: Drug Alcohol Rev
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9015440
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
revised:
08
06
2023
received:
20
12
2022
accepted:
14
06
2023
pubmed:
4
7
2023
medline:
4
7
2023
entrez:
4
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Drug-checking services can minimise the potential harms from drug use and have received increased attention in recent policy debates in Australia. In this brief report, we aim to better understand the prevalence of support for drug-checking services among individuals of certain demographic groups, social status and social attitudes towards drug and alcohol policy. This report uses data from the 2019 National Drug Strategy Household Survey, a national population study of alcohol and other drug use conducted triennially in Australia. We examined support for drug-checking services descriptively, alongside associations between demographic, social and substance use variables and support of drug-checking using Generalised Linear Model analyses with a Poisson distribution and log link. Overall, 56% of the sample supported policies related to drug-checking services. Support was highest among those aged 25-34 years (62%), most socioeconomically advantaged (66%), with an income over $104,000 (64%), with a bachelor's degree or higher (65%), living in major cities (58%), recent consumers of commonly tested drugs (88%) and other drugs (77%), and risky drinkers (64%). In the multivariable model, those who were younger, women and had the highest level of education were more likely to support the policy compared to those who were aged 55+ years, men and had lower levels of education. This report highlights that, while there were different degrees of support based on demographic characteristics, substance use status and social attitudes towards drug and alcohol policy, the overall majority of the sample supported the provision of drug-checking services.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1553-1558Subventions
Organisme : La Trobe University School of Psychology and Public Health Internal Grant Scheme
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Drug and Alcohol Review published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.
Références
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2019. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2020.
McAllister I, Makkai T. The effect of public opinion and politics on attitudes towards pill testing: results from the 2019 Australian election study. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021;40:521-9.
Ritter A. Making drug policy in summer-drug checking in Australia as providing more heat than light. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020;39:12-20.
State Coroner's Court of NSW. Inquest into the death of six patrons of NSW music festivals. Sydney: NSW State Coroner's Court; 2019.
Coroners Court of Victoria. Coroner calls for urgent drug testing services in Victoria [Internet]. Melbourne: Coroner's Court of Victoria; 2021. Available from: https://www.coronerscourt.vic.gov.au/coroner-calls-urgent-drug-testing-services-victoria
Barratt MJ, Bruno R, Ezard N, Ritter A. Pill testing or drug checking in Australia: acceptability of service design features. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018;37:226-36.
Brunt T. Drug checking as a harm reduction tool for recreational drug users: opportunities and challenges. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction; 2017.
Groves A. ‘Worth the test?’ Pragmatism, pill testing and drug policy in Australia. Harm Reduct J. 2018;15:12.
Measham F. City checking: piloting the UK's first community-based drug safety testing (drug checking) service in 2 city centres. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;86:420-8.
Hollett RC, Gately N. Risk intentions following pill test scenarios are predicted by MDMA use history and sensation seeking: a quantitative field study at an Australian music festival. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019;38:473-81.
Winstock AR, Wolff K, Ramsey J. Ecstasy pill testing: harm minimization gone too far? Addiction. 2001;96:1139-48.
Marshall BDL, Milloy MJ, Wood E, Montaner JSG, Kerr T. Reduction in overdose mortality after the opening of North America's first medically supervised safer injecting facility: a retrospective population-based study. Lancet. 2011;377:1429-37.
Day N, Criss J, Griffiths B, Gujral SK, John-Leader F, Johnston J, et al. Music festival attendees' illicit drug use, knowledge and practices regarding drug content and purity: a cross-sectional survey. Harm Reduct J. 2018;15:1.
Southey M, Kathirgamalingam A, Crawford B, Kaul R, McNamara J, John-Leader F, et al. Patterns of ecstasy use amongst live music event attendees and their opinions on pill testing: a cross sectional study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020;15:55.
Australia Bureau of Statistics. Australian statistical geography standard (ASGS). Canberra: Australia Bureau of Statistics; 2021.
National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian guidelines to reduce health risks from drinking alcohol. Australia: NHMRC; 2021.
Olsen A, Baillie G, Bruno R, McDonald D, Hammoud M, Peacock A. CanTEST health and drug checking service program evaluation: interim report. Canberra, ACT: Australian National University; 2022.
Olsen A, Wong G, McDonald D. Music festival drug checking: evaluation of an Australian pilot program. Harm Reduct J. 2020;19:127.
Gautam S, Kimeldorf G, Sampson AR. Optimized scorings for ordinal data for the general linear model. Stat Probabil Lett. 1996;27:231-9.
StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2015.