Irrational beliefs indirectly predict retirement satisfaction through the conceptualization of retirement: a cross-sectional study in a sample of recent retirees.
General irrational beliefs
Retirement concepts
Retirement satisfaction
Retirement transition
Journal
BMC psychology
ISSN: 2050-7283
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101627676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Jul 2023
04 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
29
08
2022
accepted:
20
06
2023
medline:
6
7
2023
pubmed:
5
7
2023
entrez:
4
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although most retirees are satisfied, some do not feel well in retirement. The resource-based dynamic perspective explains retirement dissatisfaction as the lack of resources. This study focused on psychological resources, specifically on the role of rational/irrational beliefs and retirement concepts in retirement satisfaction. While irrational beliefs have many consequences, we know little about their role in retirement experiences, nor do we know about the benefits/harm of retirement concepts for retirement satisfaction. We assumed that not succumbing to irrational beliefs and conceptualizing retirement actively and positively add to psychological resources helping to adjust to retirement and retirement satisfaction. Our objective was to examine whether irrational beliefs and retirement concepts contributed to satisfaction or dissatisfaction in recent retirees. 200 recent retirees (average retirement time 2.8 years) completed questionnaires containing the Irrational Belief Scale, the Satisfaction with Retirement Scale, and the Retirement Lifestyles Questionnaire, which determines the inclination toward four retirement concepts: Transition to Old Age, New Start, Continuation, and Imposed Disruption. The Pearson correlation coefficients were used to estimate the relationship between irrational beliefs, retirement concepts, and retirement satisfaction. We used a parallel mediation model with multiple mediators in the mediation analysis where irrational beliefs were the independent variable, retirement satisfaction was the dependent variable, and the four retirement concepts were mediators. We confirmed higher retirement satisfaction in recent retirees who conceptualize retirement as a New Start and Continuation and higher retirement dissatisfaction in those who see retirement as an Imposed Disruption or Transition to Old Age. The general irrational beliefs had a weaker direct impact on retirement satisfaction than the more specific retirement concepts. Inclination to general irrational beliefs appeared only weakly reflected in retirement dissatisfaction. However, a negative view of retirement as an imposed disruption might increase this inclination by intensifying retirement dissatisfaction. Our results show a negative retirement concept as an imposed disruptive event that amplifies the impact of general irrational beliefs and leads to retirement dissatisfaction in recent retirees. It suggests that using rational-emotive behavior therapy and interventions to change the negative perception of retirement could be effective in increasing retirement satisfaction.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Although most retirees are satisfied, some do not feel well in retirement. The resource-based dynamic perspective explains retirement dissatisfaction as the lack of resources. This study focused on psychological resources, specifically on the role of rational/irrational beliefs and retirement concepts in retirement satisfaction. While irrational beliefs have many consequences, we know little about their role in retirement experiences, nor do we know about the benefits/harm of retirement concepts for retirement satisfaction. We assumed that not succumbing to irrational beliefs and conceptualizing retirement actively and positively add to psychological resources helping to adjust to retirement and retirement satisfaction. Our objective was to examine whether irrational beliefs and retirement concepts contributed to satisfaction or dissatisfaction in recent retirees.
METHODS
METHODS
200 recent retirees (average retirement time 2.8 years) completed questionnaires containing the Irrational Belief Scale, the Satisfaction with Retirement Scale, and the Retirement Lifestyles Questionnaire, which determines the inclination toward four retirement concepts: Transition to Old Age, New Start, Continuation, and Imposed Disruption. The Pearson correlation coefficients were used to estimate the relationship between irrational beliefs, retirement concepts, and retirement satisfaction. We used a parallel mediation model with multiple mediators in the mediation analysis where irrational beliefs were the independent variable, retirement satisfaction was the dependent variable, and the four retirement concepts were mediators.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We confirmed higher retirement satisfaction in recent retirees who conceptualize retirement as a New Start and Continuation and higher retirement dissatisfaction in those who see retirement as an Imposed Disruption or Transition to Old Age. The general irrational beliefs had a weaker direct impact on retirement satisfaction than the more specific retirement concepts. Inclination to general irrational beliefs appeared only weakly reflected in retirement dissatisfaction. However, a negative view of retirement as an imposed disruption might increase this inclination by intensifying retirement dissatisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our results show a negative retirement concept as an imposed disruptive event that amplifies the impact of general irrational beliefs and leads to retirement dissatisfaction in recent retirees. It suggests that using rational-emotive behavior therapy and interventions to change the negative perception of retirement could be effective in increasing retirement satisfaction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37403131
doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01237-9
pii: 10.1186/s40359-023-01237-9
pmc: PMC10318810
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
195Subventions
Organisme : Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education and the Slovak Academy of Sciences
ID : 2/0091/22
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(2):455-74
pubmed: 17371091
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2017 Jun;32(2):255-279
pubmed: 28516309
Soc Sci Res. 2019 Jan;77:214-229
pubmed: 30466876
Psychol Aging. 2018 Jun;33(4):586-594
pubmed: 29733625
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2014;79(2):131-56
pubmed: 25536703
Res Aging. 2022 Oct-Dec;44(9-10):747-757
pubmed: 35331057
Psicothema. 2010 Nov;22(4):543-8
pubmed: 21044476
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov;8(6):663-6
pubmed: 26173230
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1985;21(4):291-315
pubmed: 3830911
Psychol Aging. 2007 Sep;22(3):442-55
pubmed: 17874946
Health Econ. 2018 Dec;27(12):2067-2086
pubmed: 30141568
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1994;39(3):189-208
pubmed: 7875913
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015 Jan;41(1):16-23
pubmed: 25311938
Am Psychol. 2011 Apr;66(3):204-13
pubmed: 21341882
J Aging Health. 2022 Mar;34(2):221-232
pubmed: 34420407
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Nov;47(6):659-671
pubmed: 30981287
Psychol Aging. 2008 Jun;23(2):422-34
pubmed: 18573015