Changes in movement, habitat use, and response to human disturbance accompany parturition events in bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis).
Bighorn sheep
Conservation
Hidden Markov
Lambing
Ovis canadensis
Parturition
Resource selection
Wildlife management
Journal
Movement ecology
ISSN: 2051-3933
Titre abrégé: Mov Ecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101635009
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Jul 2023
04 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
19
04
2023
accepted:
27
06
2023
medline:
5
7
2023
pubmed:
5
7
2023
entrez:
4
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Parturition and the early neonatal period are critical life history stages in ungulates with considerable implications for population growth and persistence. Understanding the changes in behaviour induced by ungulate parturition is important for supporting effective population management, but reliably identifying birth sites and dates presents a challenge for managers. Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis canadensis) are one such highly valued and ecologically important species in montane and subalpine ecosystems of Western North America. In the face of changing patterns of anthropogenic land use, wildlife managers increasingly require site-specific knowledge of the movement and habitat selection characteristics of periparturient sheep to better inform land use planning initiatives and ensure adequate protections for lambing habitat. We used movement data from GPS collared parturient (n = 13) and non-parturient (n = 8) bighorn sheep in Banff National Park, Canada to (1) identify lambing events based on changes in key movement metrics, and (2) investigate how resource selection and responses to human use change during the periparturient period. We fit a hidden Markov model (HMM) to a multivariate characterization of sheep movement (step length, daily home range area, residence time) to predict realistic lambing dates for the animals in our study system. Leave-one-out cross validation of our model resulted in a 93% success rate for parturient females. Our model, which we parameterized using data from known parturient females, also predicted lambing events in 25% of known non-parturient ewes in a test dataset. Using a latent selection difference function and resource selection functions, we tested for postpartum changes in habitat use, as well as seasonal differences in habitat selection. Immediately following lambing, ewes preferentially selected high-elevation sites on solar aspects that were more rugged, closer to escape terrain, and further from roads. Within-home range habitat selection was similar between individuals in different reproductive states, but parturient ewes had stronger selection for low snow depth, sites closer to barren ground, and sites further from trails. We propose that movement-based approaches such as HMMs are a valuable tool for identifying critical parturition habitat in species with complex movement patterns and may have particular utility in study areas without access to extensive field observations or vaginal implant transmitters. Furthermore, our results suggest that managers should minimize human disturbance in lambing areas to avoid interfering with maternal behaviour and ensure access to a broad range of suitable habitat in the periparturient period.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37403172
doi: 10.1186/s40462-023-00404-2
pii: 10.1186/s40462-023-00404-2
pmc: PMC10318713
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
36Informations de copyright
© 2023. Crown.
Références
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 07;9(2):e88271
pubmed: 24516623
Ecol Lett. 2009 May;12(5):395-408
pubmed: 19379134
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jul 27;365(1550):2303-12
pubmed: 20566506
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Nov;82(6):1183-91
pubmed: 24499379
Oecologia. 1988 May;75(4):580-586
pubmed: 28312434
Mov Ecol. 2022 Apr 8;10(1):17
pubmed: 35395833
Ecol Evol. 2018 May 04;8(11):5863-5872
pubmed: 29938099
Ecol Appl. 2022 Jan;32(1):e02470
pubmed: 34626518
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Jan;89(1):80-92
pubmed: 31454066
Ecology. 2012 Nov;93(11):2336-42
pubmed: 23236905
Ecol Evol. 2013 Oct;3(12):4149-60
pubmed: 24324866
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Feb 1;13(2):58-63
pubmed: 21238201
Ecology. 2008 Dec;89(12):3336-48
pubmed: 19137941
J Anim Ecol. 2022 Feb;91(2):287-307
pubmed: 34657296