Patient safety culture at the unit level of a tertiary hospital in South Africa: a survey study.

South Africa adverse events patient safety culture quality improvement

Journal

Journal of public health in Africa
ISSN: 2038-9922
Titre abrégé: J Public Health Afr
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101586943

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 16 05 2022
accepted: 03 07 2022
medline: 5 7 2023
pubmed: 5 7 2023
entrez: 5 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Patient safety research is scarce in developing countries. Estimates of patient harm due to healthcare processes in resource-poor settings are thought to be greater than those in developed countries. Ideally, errors in healthcare should be seen as opportunities to improve the future quality of care. This study aimed to investigate patient safety culture within high-risk units of a tertiary hospital in South Africa. A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional methodology, using a survey questionnaire that measured 10 safety dimensions and one outcome measure among clinical and nursing staff, was employed. Two hundred participants completed the survey questionnaire. Areas of strength identified by the participants included organizational learning (91.09%), staff attitudes (88.83%), and perceptions of patient safety (76.65%). Dimensions that have potential for improvement included awareness and training (74.04%), litigation (73.53%), feedback and communication about errors (70.77%), non-punitive response to error reporting (51.01%), size and tertiary level of the hospital (53.76%), and infrastructure and resources (58.07%) There are still significant gaps in the quality of care provided at this tertiary hospital. The current patient safety culture is perceived as punitive in nature with regard to reporting adverse events. It is advised that targeted patient safety improvements be made, followed by further investigation.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Patient safety research is scarce in developing countries. Estimates of patient harm due to healthcare processes in resource-poor settings are thought to be greater than those in developed countries. Ideally, errors in healthcare should be seen as opportunities to improve the future quality of care.
Objective UNASSIGNED
This study aimed to investigate patient safety culture within high-risk units of a tertiary hospital in South Africa.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional methodology, using a survey questionnaire that measured 10 safety dimensions and one outcome measure among clinical and nursing staff, was employed.
Results UNASSIGNED
Two hundred participants completed the survey questionnaire. Areas of strength identified by the participants included organizational learning (91.09%), staff attitudes (88.83%), and perceptions of patient safety (76.65%). Dimensions that have potential for improvement included awareness and training (74.04%), litigation (73.53%), feedback and communication about errors (70.77%), non-punitive response to error reporting (51.01%), size and tertiary level of the hospital (53.76%), and infrastructure and resources (58.07%)
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
There are still significant gaps in the quality of care provided at this tertiary hospital. The current patient safety culture is perceived as punitive in nature with regard to reporting adverse events. It is advised that targeted patient safety improvements be made, followed by further investigation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37404332
doi: 10.4081/jphia.2023.2228
pmc: PMC10316702
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2228

Informations de copyright

©Copyright: the Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest: the authors declare no potential conflict of interest, and all authors confirm accuracy.

Références

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 May 21;14:2099-2110
pubmed: 34054311
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Oct 11;76(11):3045-3058
pubmed: 34473285
Clin Nephrol. 2010 Nov;74 Suppl 1:S129-33
pubmed: 20979978
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Nov 01;30(9):660-677
pubmed: 29788273
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Mar 31;10:85
pubmed: 20356351
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):e17
pubmed: 20430929
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2022 Dec;17(1):2066252
pubmed: 35445629
Global Health. 2015 Feb 25;11:6
pubmed: 25885903
Curationis. 2015 Nov 05;38(1):
pubmed: 26841919
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 24;13:228
pubmed: 23800307
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Feb;12(2):159-168
pubmed: 30407089
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;18(12):1329-1349
pubmed: 30507459
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb 24;11:45
pubmed: 21349179
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2021 Oct;19(10):1353-1366
pubmed: 33724147
Hosp Pract (1995). 2018 Oct;46(4):221-228
pubmed: 30092683
ScientificWorldJournal. 2018 Jul 19;2018:9156301
pubmed: 30104917
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):364-6
pubmed: 16195571
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Nov 09;8:751
pubmed: 29163151
N Engl J Med. 2006 May 25;354(21):2205-8
pubmed: 16723612
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jul;23(7):556-64
pubmed: 24351971
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 2:ii17-23
pubmed: 14645891
BMJ. 2012 Mar 13;344:e832
pubmed: 22416061
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Aug;23(4):357-64
pubmed: 21561979
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Aug 18;11:1267
pubmed: 32973508

Auteurs

Veena Abraham (V)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Medunsa, South Africa.

Johanna Meyer (J)

Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Medunsa, South Africa.

Elvera Helberg (E)

Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Medunsa, South Africa.

Classifications MeSH