Retrospective Review of the Efficacy of Droperidol Compared to Prochlorperazine for Headache Management in the Emergency Department.
droperidol
headache
ketorolac tromethamine
migraine
prochlorperazine
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
accepted:
25
05
2023
medline:
5
7
2023
pubmed:
5
7
2023
entrez:
5
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction Headaches are a common presentation to the emergency department, representing approximately 3% of visits. The standard treatment of headaches has consisted of either monotherapy with an antidopaminergic agent or combination therapy with an antidopaminergic agent, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and diphenhydramine. Although droperidol is an antidopaminergic medication, it previously was not widely used in the treatment of headaches due to safety concerns. Given its pharmacokinetics, droperidol may provide faster relief in migrainous headaches compared to more commonly used antidopaminergic agents. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review to examine the impact of droperidol compared to other standard migraine therapies on pain scores. The study consisted of three treatment arms: droperidol monotherapy, a droperidol bundle (droperidol and ketorolac), and a prochlorperazine bundle (prochlorperazine and ketorolac). Patients who received medications in treatment arms and who had an encounter diagnosis including either "headache" or "migraine" were included. Patients were excluded if under 18 years of age, imprisoned, pregnant, or received potentially migraine-altering medications prior to the first documented pain score. The primary outcome was a mean reduction in pain scores. Secondary outcomes included length of emergency department stay, rates of inpatient admission, need for rescue therapies, and adverse events. Results A total of 361 droperidol orders were reviewed, of which 79 met the inclusion criteria. Of those included, 30 orders were within the droperidol monotherapy arm, 19 were within the droperidol bundle arm, and 30 were within the prochlorperazine bundle arm. There were no significant differences in reduction of pain scores, emergency department length of stay, rates of inpatient admission, rates of rescue therapy, or adverse events between the three treatment arms. Conclusion In this study, we found no statistical difference in migraine treatment efficacy between droperidol monotherapy and droperidol and prochlorperazine-based bundle therapies. Further studies are needed with larger sample sizes and predefined timing between pain score charting and medication administration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37404431
doi: 10.7759/cureus.39848
pmc: PMC10314824
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e39848Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Driller et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Emerg Med. 2004 Feb;26(2):145-50
pubmed: 14980334
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Feb;49(2):233-40
pubmed: 25416184
Headache. 2018 Apr;58(4):496-505
pubmed: 29527677
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 May;77(5):880-6
pubmed: 24168079
Anesthesiology. 2007 Oct;107(4):531-6
pubmed: 17893447
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Sep;8(9):873-9
pubmed: 11535479
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;69(2):202-207
pubmed: 27510942
Am J Emerg Med. 1999 Jul;17(4):398-400
pubmed: 10452443
Headache. 2015 Jan;55(1):3-20
pubmed: 25600718
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 02;21(4):728-736
pubmed: 32726229
Neurology. 2003 Jan 28;60(2):315-21
pubmed: 12552051
Am Fam Physician. 2011 Feb 1;83(3):271-80
pubmed: 21302868
Headache. 2015 Jun;55(6):778-93
pubmed: 25877672