Epic Sepsis Model Inpatient Predictive Analytic Tool: A Validation Study.
early warning score
hospital mortality
predictive value of tests
sepsis
validation study
Journal
Critical care explorations
ISSN: 2639-8028
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Explor
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101746347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
medline:
5
7
2023
pubmed:
5
7
2023
entrez:
5
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Earlier treatment of sepsis leads to decreased mortality. Epic is an electronic medical record providing a predictive alert system for sepsis, the Epic Sepsis Model (ESM) Inpatient Predictive Analytic Tool. External validation of this system is lacking. This study aims to evaluate the ESM as a sepsis screening tool and determine whether an association exists between ESM alert system implementation and subsequent sepsis-related mortality. Before-and-after study comparing baseline and intervention period. Urban 746-bed academic level 1 trauma center. Adult acute care inpatients discharged between January 12, 2018, and July 31, 2019. During the before period, ESM was turned on in the background, but nurses and providers were not alerted of results. The system was then activated to alert providers of scores greater than or equal to 5, a set point determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve, 0.834; Primary outcome was mortality during hospitalization; secondary outcomes were sepsis order set utilization, length of stay, and timing of administration of sepsis-appropriate antibiotics. Of the 11,512 inpatient encounters assessed by ESM, 10.2% (1,171) had sepsis based on diagnosis codes. As a screening test, the ESM had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value rates of 86.0%, 80.8%, 33.8%, and 98.11%, respectively. After ESM implementation, unadjusted mortality rates in patients with ESM score greater than or equal to 5 and who had not yet received sepsis-appropriate antibiotics declined from 24.3% to 15.9%; multivariable analysis yielded an odds ratio of sepsis-related mortality (95% CI) of 0.56 (0.39-0.80). In this single-center before-and-after study, utilization of the ESM score as a screening test was associated with a 44% reduction in the odds of sepsis-related mortality. Due to wide utilization of Epic, this is a potentially promising tool to improve sepsis mortality in the United States. This study is hypothesis generating, and further work with more rigorous study design is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37405252
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000941
pmc: PMC10317482
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e0941Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Références
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 30;13(7):e0198847
pubmed: 30059504
Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):137-141
pubmed: 31939780
J Crit Care. 2017 Aug;40:296-302
pubmed: 28412015
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 1;195(7):906-911
pubmed: 27649072
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 May;57(5):500-4
pubmed: 21227543
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jun;19(e1):e145-8
pubmed: 22534081
JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1241-1249
pubmed: 28903154
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):523-529
pubmed: 29025165
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1065-1070
pubmed: 34152373
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 May 28;70(695):e381-e388
pubmed: 32269043
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):88-95
pubmed: 27225197
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):274-283
pubmed: 31743934
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017 Nov 09;4(1):e000234
pubmed: 29435343
Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov;46(11):1753-1760
pubmed: 30024430
Resuscitation. 2013 Apr;84(4):465-70
pubmed: 23295778
QJM. 2001 Oct;94(10):521-6
pubmed: 11588210
Crit Care Clin. 2012 Jan;28(1):57-76, vi
pubmed: 22123099
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 23;5(12):e009487
pubmed: 26700284
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;36(10):1745-1748
pubmed: 29395762
Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1749-55
pubmed: 24717459
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244
pubmed: 28528569
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):925-928
pubmed: 29675566
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):395-406
pubmed: 27941371
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1589-96
pubmed: 16625125
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 06;19:139
pubmed: 25887596
PeerJ. 2014 Apr 10;2:e343
pubmed: 24765577
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Jan 18;8(1):47-66
pubmed: 28097288
Crit Care Med. 2011 Mar;39(3):469-73
pubmed: 21169824
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Sep;28(9):762-768
pubmed: 30872387
Chest. 2017 Feb;151(2):278-285
pubmed: 27452768