The Association Between Goal Setting and Weight Loss: Prospective Analysis of a Community Weight Loss Program.


Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 07 2023
Historique:
received: 28 10 2022
accepted: 06 06 2023
revised: 05 05 2023
medline: 7 7 2023
pubmed: 5 7 2023
entrez: 5 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Goal setting aids health-related behavior changes; however, the influence of different types of goals on weight loss remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the association of 3 aspects of goal setting with weight and program dropout over a 24-week period. This study was a prospective longitudinal analysis of participants in a 12-week digital behavioral weight loss program. Weight and engagement data for eligible participants (N=36,794) were extracted from the database. Eligible participants were adults in the United Kingdom who had enrolled in the program, had a BMI ≥25 kg/m Of the 36,794 participants (mean 46.7, SD 11.1 years; 33,902/36,794, 92.14% female) included in the cohort, 13.09% (n=4818) reported weight at 24 weeks. Most participants set goals of 5%-10% weight loss (23,629/36,794, 64.22%), but setting goals for >10% was associated with greater weight loss (mean difference 5.21 kg, 95% CI 5.01-5.41; P<.001). There was no difference between goals of 5%-10% and <5% (mean difference 0.59 kg, 95% CI 0.00-1.18; P=.05). Appearance was the most prevalent motivational factor (14,736/36,794, 40.05%), but health and fitness were associated with greater weight losses (mean difference health vs appearance 1.40 kg, 95% CI 1.15-1.65; P<.001 and mean difference fitness vs appearance 0.38 kg, 95% CI 0.05-0.70; P=.03). Goal preference had no association with weight. Engagement was an independent predictor of weight loss but not a mediator of the effect of goal setting. At 24 weeks, those who set goals of >10% were less likely to drop out compared with 5%-10% goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, 95% CI 0.38-0.42; P<.001); those who liked to set overall high goals were more likely to drop out compared with medium goals (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11-1.29; P<.001); and those motivated by fitness or health were less likely to drop out compared with appearance (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.995; P=.04 and OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.89; P<.001, respectively). Setting higher weight loss goals and being motivated by health or fitness were associated with greater weight loss and lower likelihood of dropout. Randomized trials for setting these types of goals are required to confirm causality.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Goal setting aids health-related behavior changes; however, the influence of different types of goals on weight loss remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to investigate the association of 3 aspects of goal setting with weight and program dropout over a 24-week period.
METHODS
This study was a prospective longitudinal analysis of participants in a 12-week digital behavioral weight loss program. Weight and engagement data for eligible participants (N=36,794) were extracted from the database. Eligible participants were adults in the United Kingdom who had enrolled in the program, had a BMI ≥25 kg/m
RESULTS
Of the 36,794 participants (mean 46.7, SD 11.1 years; 33,902/36,794, 92.14% female) included in the cohort, 13.09% (n=4818) reported weight at 24 weeks. Most participants set goals of 5%-10% weight loss (23,629/36,794, 64.22%), but setting goals for >10% was associated with greater weight loss (mean difference 5.21 kg, 95% CI 5.01-5.41; P<.001). There was no difference between goals of 5%-10% and <5% (mean difference 0.59 kg, 95% CI 0.00-1.18; P=.05). Appearance was the most prevalent motivational factor (14,736/36,794, 40.05%), but health and fitness were associated with greater weight losses (mean difference health vs appearance 1.40 kg, 95% CI 1.15-1.65; P<.001 and mean difference fitness vs appearance 0.38 kg, 95% CI 0.05-0.70; P=.03). Goal preference had no association with weight. Engagement was an independent predictor of weight loss but not a mediator of the effect of goal setting. At 24 weeks, those who set goals of >10% were less likely to drop out compared with 5%-10% goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, 95% CI 0.38-0.42; P<.001); those who liked to set overall high goals were more likely to drop out compared with medium goals (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11-1.29; P<.001); and those motivated by fitness or health were less likely to drop out compared with appearance (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.995; P=.04 and OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.89; P<.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Setting higher weight loss goals and being motivated by health or fitness were associated with greater weight loss and lower likelihood of dropout. Randomized trials for setting these types of goals are required to confirm causality.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37405833
pii: v25i1e43869
doi: 10.2196/43869
pmc: PMC10357317
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e43869

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R015708/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : IS-BRC-1215-20008
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

©Gina M Wren, Dimitrios A Koutoukidis, Jadine Scragg, Michael Whitman, Susan Jebb. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 05.07.2023.

Références

Behav Res Ther. 1980;18(2):139-45
pubmed: 7369993
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004 Aug 2;1(1):12
pubmed: 15287984
Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Oct;78(4):684-9
pubmed: 14522725
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 5;25:e43869
pubmed: 37405833
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Mar 02;9:22
pubmed: 22385818
Am Psychol. 2002 Sep;57(9):705-17
pubmed: 12237980
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016 Dec;29(6):687-696
pubmed: 27302147
Behav Res Ther. 2001 May;39(5):499-511
pubmed: 11341247
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jan;40(1):18-24
pubmed: 21146763
Telemed J E Health. 2008 Oct;14(8):775-82
pubmed: 18954247
Obes Res. 2004 Dec;12(12):2005-12
pubmed: 15687402
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 8;9(11):e30622
pubmed: 34747706
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Dec;85(12):1182-1198
pubmed: 29189034
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Aug;61(2):257-66
pubmed: 1920065
Obes Facts. 2010 Jun;3(3):205-11
pubmed: 20616611
Health Psychol Open. 2018 Dec 05;5(2):2055102918816606
pubmed: 30574337
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Mar;21(3):449-53
pubmed: 23404944
J Behav Med. 2002 Dec;25(6):499-523
pubmed: 12462956
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jan 21;8(1):e13273
pubmed: 31961335
Obes Res. 2005 Nov;13(11):1961-9
pubmed: 16339128
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
pubmed: 3806354
Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Aug;66(2):239-46
pubmed: 9250100
Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S102-38
pubmed: 24222017
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Obes Res. 2004 Mar;12(3):569-76
pubmed: 15044676
Am J Mens Health. 2017 Mar;11(2):369-375
pubmed: 27923968
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020 Nov;40(6):383-387
pubmed: 32694455
JMIR Diabetes. 2020 Jan 20;5(1):e15189
pubmed: 31958064
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 May;23(5):957-64
pubmed: 25865433
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Nov;34(11):1556-69
pubmed: 18663122
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Feb;65(1):79-85
pubmed: 9103737
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jun 22;9:78
pubmed: 22726453
J Health Psychol. 2013 May;18(5):638-47
pubmed: 22933574
Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Feb;35(2):259-69
pubmed: 20680012
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 15;63(14):1345-54
pubmed: 24530666
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Dec;71(6):1084-9
pubmed: 14622084
Qual Health Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1223-33
pubmed: 19690204
Int J Obes. 1984;8(5):435-9
pubmed: 6519904
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 8;8(7):e17842
pubmed: 32459631
Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;28(6):690-701
pubmed: 19916637
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 17;22(3):e15790
pubmed: 32181749
Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Nov;31(11):1739-45
pubmed: 17471295
Obes Sci Pract. 2016 Jun;2(2):154-161
pubmed: 27840688
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Aug 04;12:12-19
pubmed: 30116705
Obes Facts. 2015;8(5):311-8
pubmed: 26444382

Auteurs

Gina M Wren (GM)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Dimitrios A Koutoukidis (DA)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Jadine Scragg (J)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Michael Whitman (M)

Second Nature, London, United Kingdom.

Susan Jebb (S)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH