Digitally Assisted Peer Recovery Coach to Facilitate Linkage to Outpatient Treatment Following Inpatient Alcohol Withdrawal Treatment: Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study.

Lifeguard alcohol alcohol use disorder care coordination coaching detox detoxification digitally drinking health app inpatient alcohol inpatient detoxification mHealth mobile app mobile health peer recovery peer recovery coach peer support recovery smartphone app substance abuse substance use

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 07 10 2022
accepted: 13 04 2023
revised: 17 03 2023
medline: 5 7 2023
pubmed: 5 7 2023
entrez: 5 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Alcohol use disorder (AUD), associated with significant morbidity and mortality, continues to be a major public health problem. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the impact of AUD, with a 25% increase in alcohol-related mortality from 2019 to 2020. Thus, innovative treatments for AUD are urgently needed. While inpatient alcohol withdrawal management (detoxification) is often an entry point for recovery, most do not successfully link to ongoing treatment. Transitions between inpatient and outpatient treatment pose many challenges to successful treatment continuation. Peer recovery coaches-individuals with the lived experience of recovery who obtain training to be coaches-are increasingly used to assist individuals with AUD and may provide a degree of continuity during this transition. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using an existing care coordination app (Lifeguard) to assist peer recovery coaches in supporting patients after discharge and facilitating linkage to care. This study was conducted on an American Society of Addiction Medicine-Level IV inpatient withdrawal management unit within an academic medical center in Boston, MA. After providing informed consent, participants were contacted by the coach through the app, and after discharge, received daily prompts to complete a modified version of the brief addiction monitor (BAM). The BAM inquired about alcohol use, risky, and protective factors. The coach sent daily motivational texts and appointment reminders and checked in if BAM responses were concerning. Postdischarge follow-up continued for 30 days. The following feasibility outcomes were evaluated: (1) proportion of participants engaging with the coach before discharge, (2) proportion of participants and the number of days engaging with the coach after discharge, (3) proportion of participants and the number of days responding to BAM prompts, and (4) proportion of participants successfully linking with addiction treatment by 30-day follow-up. All 10 participants were men, averaged 50.5 years old, and were mostly White (n=6), non-Hispanic (n=9), and single (n=8). Overall, 8 participants successfully engaged with the coach prior to discharge. Following discharge, 6 participants continued to engage with the coach, doing so on an average of 5.3 days (SD 7.3, range 0-20 days); 5 participants responded to the BAM prompts during the follow-up, doing so on an average of 4.6 days (SD 6.9, range 0-21 days). Half (n=5) successfully linked with ongoing addiction treatment during the follow-up. The participants who engaged with the coach post discharge, compared to those who did not, were significantly more likely to link with treatment (83% vs 0%, χ The results demonstrated that a digitally assisted peer recovery coach may be feasible in facilitating linkage to care following discharge from inpatient withdrawal management treatment. Further research is warranted to evaluate the potential role for peer recovery coaches in improving postdischarge outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05393544; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05393544.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Alcohol use disorder (AUD), associated with significant morbidity and mortality, continues to be a major public health problem. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the impact of AUD, with a 25% increase in alcohol-related mortality from 2019 to 2020. Thus, innovative treatments for AUD are urgently needed. While inpatient alcohol withdrawal management (detoxification) is often an entry point for recovery, most do not successfully link to ongoing treatment. Transitions between inpatient and outpatient treatment pose many challenges to successful treatment continuation. Peer recovery coaches-individuals with the lived experience of recovery who obtain training to be coaches-are increasingly used to assist individuals with AUD and may provide a degree of continuity during this transition.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using an existing care coordination app (Lifeguard) to assist peer recovery coaches in supporting patients after discharge and facilitating linkage to care.
METHODS METHODS
This study was conducted on an American Society of Addiction Medicine-Level IV inpatient withdrawal management unit within an academic medical center in Boston, MA. After providing informed consent, participants were contacted by the coach through the app, and after discharge, received daily prompts to complete a modified version of the brief addiction monitor (BAM). The BAM inquired about alcohol use, risky, and protective factors. The coach sent daily motivational texts and appointment reminders and checked in if BAM responses were concerning. Postdischarge follow-up continued for 30 days. The following feasibility outcomes were evaluated: (1) proportion of participants engaging with the coach before discharge, (2) proportion of participants and the number of days engaging with the coach after discharge, (3) proportion of participants and the number of days responding to BAM prompts, and (4) proportion of participants successfully linking with addiction treatment by 30-day follow-up.
RESULTS RESULTS
All 10 participants were men, averaged 50.5 years old, and were mostly White (n=6), non-Hispanic (n=9), and single (n=8). Overall, 8 participants successfully engaged with the coach prior to discharge. Following discharge, 6 participants continued to engage with the coach, doing so on an average of 5.3 days (SD 7.3, range 0-20 days); 5 participants responded to the BAM prompts during the follow-up, doing so on an average of 4.6 days (SD 6.9, range 0-21 days). Half (n=5) successfully linked with ongoing addiction treatment during the follow-up. The participants who engaged with the coach post discharge, compared to those who did not, were significantly more likely to link with treatment (83% vs 0%, χ
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results demonstrated that a digitally assisted peer recovery coach may be feasible in facilitating linkage to care following discharge from inpatient withdrawal management treatment. Further research is warranted to evaluate the potential role for peer recovery coaches in improving postdischarge outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05393544; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05393544.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37405844
pii: v7i1e43304
doi: 10.2196/43304
pmc: PMC10357372
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05393544']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e43304

Subventions

Organisme : NIAAA NIH HHS
ID : R21 AA030372
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R21 DA056799
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Joji Suzuki, Frank Loguidice, Sara Prostko, Veronica Szpak, Samata Sharma, Lisa Vercollone, Carol Garner, David Ahern. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 05.07.2023.

Références

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Aug;47(2):130-9
pubmed: 24912862
J Addict Dis. 2011 Apr;30(2):136-48
pubmed: 21491295
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Apr;34(3):363-9
pubmed: 17614242
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Aug;17(8):602
pubmed: 26073363
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Mar;44(3):256-63
pubmed: 22898042
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Mar;122:108248
pubmed: 33509420
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001 Jan 1;61(2):137-43
pubmed: 11137278
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2019 Sep;42(3):305-313
pubmed: 30489140
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Nov;70:64-72
pubmed: 27692190
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Jan;120:108152
pubmed: 33129636
Psychol Addict Behav. 2021 Nov;35(7):829-839
pubmed: 32597665
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 13;10:1052
pubmed: 31263434
Subst Abus. 2018;39(3):307-314
pubmed: 28991516
Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 May;72(4):303-310
pubmed: 29560777
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011 Mar;40(2):123-31
pubmed: 21094591
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Feb 11;18(1):9
pubmed: 36774507
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Apr;99:24-31
pubmed: 30797391
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 25;6(3):e33073
pubmed: 35333189

Auteurs

Joji Suzuki (J)

Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Frank Loguidice (F)

Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

Sara Prostko (S)

Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

Veronica Szpak (V)

Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

Samata Sharma (S)

Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Lisa Vercollone (L)

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

Carol Garner (C)

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

David Ahern (D)

Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Classifications MeSH