Data repurposing from digital home cage monitoring enlightens new perspectives on mouse motor behaviour and reduction principle.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 07 2023
Historique:
received: 13 12 2022
accepted: 22 06 2023
medline: 7 7 2023
pubmed: 6 7 2023
entrez: 5 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In this longitudinal study we compare between and within-strain variation in the home-cage spatial preference of three widely used and commercially available mice strains-C57BL/6NCrl, BALB/cAnNCrl and CRL:CD1(ICR)-starting from the first hour post cage-change until the next cage-change, for three consecutive intervals, to further profile the circadian home-cage behavioural phenotypes. Cage-change can be a stressful moment in the life of laboratory mice, since animals are disturbed during the sleeping hours and must then rapidly re-adapt to a pristine environment, leading to disruptions in normal motor patterns. The novelty of this study resides in characterizing new strain-specific biological phenomena, such as activity along the cage walls and frontality, using the vast data reserves generated by previous experimental data, thus introducing the potential and exploring the applicability of data repurposing to enhance Reduction principle when running in vivo studies. Our results, entirely obtained without the use of new animals, demonstrate that also when referring to space preference within the cage, C57BL/6NCrl has a high variability in the behavioural phenotypes from pre-puberty until early adulthood compared to BALB/cAnNCrl, which is confirmed to be socially disaggregated, and CRL:CD1(ICR) which is conversely highly active and socially aggregated. Our data also suggest that a strain-oriented approach is needed when defining frequency of cage-change as well as maximum allowed animal density, which should be revised, ideally under the EU regulatory framework as well, according to the physiological peculiarities of the strains, and always avoiding the "one size fits all" approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37407633
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37464-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-37464-8
pmc: PMC10322864
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

10851

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2004 Nov;43(6):42-51
pubmed: 15669134
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2014 Jan;53(1):29-37
pubmed: 24411777
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 29;9(1):17960
pubmed: 31784565
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):190574
pubmed: 31312505
J Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Jun;149(2):46-52
pubmed: 35512854
Behav Brain Res. 2007 Jan 10;176(1):53-65
pubmed: 16890300
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 18;8(1):1064
pubmed: 29348406
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):658
pubmed: 33436724
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Sep;45(9):1257-60
pubmed: 18755331
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002 May;26(3):381-91
pubmed: 12034137
Horm Behav. 2006 Dec;50(5):667-80
pubmed: 16890940
Front Neurosci. 2020 Sep 01;14:896
pubmed: 32982678
Front Zool. 2015 Aug 24;12 Suppl 1:S17
pubmed: 26816516
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Dec;15(12):715-716
pubmed: 30061595
Genetica. 1968;38(4):419-29
pubmed: 5691582
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2014 Jan;53(1):24-8
pubmed: 24411776
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2011 Nov;50(6):868-78
pubmed: 22330779
PLoS One. 2022 May 25;17(5):e0267281
pubmed: 35613182
Lab Anim (NY). 2021 Aug;50(8):215-223
pubmed: 34155410
Heliyon. 2019 Apr 04;5(4):e01454
pubmed: 30997429
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2009 Nov;48(6):763-73
pubmed: 19930825
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Jul;97(1):347-59
pubmed: 14990560
Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Mar 12;7:17
pubmed: 23487260
Dev Psychobiol. 2011 Mar;53(2):141-56
pubmed: 20886536
Front Behav Neurosci. 2010 Jun 14;4:29
pubmed: 20676234
Science. 1999 Jun 4;284(5420):1670-2
pubmed: 10356397
Nat Protoc. 2018 Jun;13(6):1331-1347
pubmed: 29773907
Prog Brain Res. 2022;273(1):97-116
pubmed: 35940726
Nature. 2015 Oct 15;526(7573):426-9
pubmed: 26352469
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 4;14(2):e0211063
pubmed: 30716111
Lab Anim. 2016 Feb;50(1):21-9
pubmed: 25979911
Physiol Behav. 2012 Jul 16;106(5):602-11
pubmed: 22713295
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 16;9(1):6179
pubmed: 30992464

Auteurs

Sara Fuochi (S)

Experimental Animal Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Mara Rigamonti (M)

Tecniplast SpA, Buguggiate, Italy.

Marcello Raspa (M)

National Research Council, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (CNR-IBBC/EMMA/Infrafrontier/IMPC), International Campus 'A. Buzzati-Traverso', Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.

Ferdinando Scavizzi (F)

National Research Council, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (CNR-IBBC/EMMA/Infrafrontier/IMPC), International Campus 'A. Buzzati-Traverso', Monterotondo, Rome, Italy.

Paolo de Girolamo (P)

Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Livia D'Angelo (L)

Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. livia.dangelo@unina.it.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH