Baseline characterization of entomological drivers of malaria transmission in Namibia: a targeted operational entomological surveillance strategy.
Entomological drivers
Malaria
Namibia
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jul 2023
05 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
31
10
2022
accepted:
28
05
2023
medline:
7
7
2023
pubmed:
6
7
2023
entrez:
5
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Namibia's focus on the elimination of malaria requires an evidence-based strategy directed at understanding and targeting the entomological drivers of malaria transmission. In 2018 and 2019, the Namibia National Vector-borne Diseases Control Program (NVDCP) implemented baseline entomological surveillance based on a question-based approach outlined in the Entomological Surveillance Planning Tool (ESPT). In the present study, we report on the findings of the ESPT-based NVDCP on baseline vector species composition and bionomic traits in malaria endemic regions in northern Namibia, which has the aim of generating an evidence base for programmatic decision-making. Nine representative sentinel sites were included in the 2018 entomological surveillance program (Kunene, Omusati, Oshana, Ohangwena, Oshikoto, Otjozondjupa, Kavango West, Kavango East and Zambezi); the number was reduced to four sites in 2019 due to limited funding (Ohangwena, Kavango West, Kavango East, and Zambezi). In the 2018 baseline collections, multiple sampling methods (human landing catches, pyrethroid spray catches, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention light traps [CDC-LTs], resting boxes [RBs] and larval sampling) were utilized to evaluate indoor/outdoor human biting rates, resting behaviors and insecticide resistance (IR). CDC-LTs and RBs were not used in 2019 due to low and non-representative sampling efficacies. Overall, molecular evidence demonstrated the presence of three primary mosquito vectors, namely Anopheles arabiensis, rediscovered Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto and Anopheles funestus sensu stricto, alongside Anopheles squamosus and members of the Anopheles coustani complex. Vectors were found to bite throughout the night (1800 hours 0600 hours) both indoors and outdoors, with An. arabiensis having the highest biting rates outdoors. Low numbers of indoor resting Anopheles point to possible low indoor residual spraying (IRS) efficacy-with An. arabiensis found to be the major vector species resting indoors. The IR tests demonstrated varying country-wide resistance levels to the insecticide deltamethrin, with the resistance levels confirmed to have increased in 2019, evidence that impacts national programmatic decision-making. Vectors demonstrated susceptibility to the insecticides dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, bendiocarb and Actellic 300CS in 2018, with mosquitoes from only one site (Kavango West) demonstrating possible resistance to DDT. Targeted and question-based entomological surveillance enabled a rapid and focused evidence base to be built, showing where and when humans were being bitten and providing entomological data on long-lasting insecticidal nets, IRS efficacy and insecticide resistance, which the Ministry of Health and Social Services-Namibia can use to further build a monitoring and evaluation framework for understanding the drivers of transmission. Identification and characterization of species-specific bionomic traits allows for an understanding of where and when vector human contact may occur as well as the potential impact of interventions. Low indoor resting rates as well as the presence of insecticide resistance (and the increase in its frequency) point to the need for mosquito-behavior-directed and appropriate interventions as well as the requirement for a resistance mitigation strategy. The ESPT-based question- and minimal essential indicator-based operational research strategy provides programs with directed and focused data for facilitating decision-making while requiring limited funding and capacity.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Namibia's focus on the elimination of malaria requires an evidence-based strategy directed at understanding and targeting the entomological drivers of malaria transmission. In 2018 and 2019, the Namibia National Vector-borne Diseases Control Program (NVDCP) implemented baseline entomological surveillance based on a question-based approach outlined in the Entomological Surveillance Planning Tool (ESPT). In the present study, we report on the findings of the ESPT-based NVDCP on baseline vector species composition and bionomic traits in malaria endemic regions in northern Namibia, which has the aim of generating an evidence base for programmatic decision-making.
METHODS
METHODS
Nine representative sentinel sites were included in the 2018 entomological surveillance program (Kunene, Omusati, Oshana, Ohangwena, Oshikoto, Otjozondjupa, Kavango West, Kavango East and Zambezi); the number was reduced to four sites in 2019 due to limited funding (Ohangwena, Kavango West, Kavango East, and Zambezi). In the 2018 baseline collections, multiple sampling methods (human landing catches, pyrethroid spray catches, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention light traps [CDC-LTs], resting boxes [RBs] and larval sampling) were utilized to evaluate indoor/outdoor human biting rates, resting behaviors and insecticide resistance (IR). CDC-LTs and RBs were not used in 2019 due to low and non-representative sampling efficacies.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, molecular evidence demonstrated the presence of three primary mosquito vectors, namely Anopheles arabiensis, rediscovered Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto and Anopheles funestus sensu stricto, alongside Anopheles squamosus and members of the Anopheles coustani complex. Vectors were found to bite throughout the night (1800 hours 0600 hours) both indoors and outdoors, with An. arabiensis having the highest biting rates outdoors. Low numbers of indoor resting Anopheles point to possible low indoor residual spraying (IRS) efficacy-with An. arabiensis found to be the major vector species resting indoors. The IR tests demonstrated varying country-wide resistance levels to the insecticide deltamethrin, with the resistance levels confirmed to have increased in 2019, evidence that impacts national programmatic decision-making. Vectors demonstrated susceptibility to the insecticides dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, bendiocarb and Actellic 300CS in 2018, with mosquitoes from only one site (Kavango West) demonstrating possible resistance to DDT. Targeted and question-based entomological surveillance enabled a rapid and focused evidence base to be built, showing where and when humans were being bitten and providing entomological data on long-lasting insecticidal nets, IRS efficacy and insecticide resistance, which the Ministry of Health and Social Services-Namibia can use to further build a monitoring and evaluation framework for understanding the drivers of transmission.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Identification and characterization of species-specific bionomic traits allows for an understanding of where and when vector human contact may occur as well as the potential impact of interventions. Low indoor resting rates as well as the presence of insecticide resistance (and the increase in its frequency) point to the need for mosquito-behavior-directed and appropriate interventions as well as the requirement for a resistance mitigation strategy. The ESPT-based question- and minimal essential indicator-based operational research strategy provides programs with directed and focused data for facilitating decision-making while requiring limited funding and capacity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37408058
doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05822-0
pii: 10.1186/s13071-023-05822-0
pmc: PMC10324217
doi:
Substances chimiques
Insecticides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
220Subventions
Organisme : Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
ID : Gates Grant # Inv-009652
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Dec 01;112(12):546-554
pubmed: 30252108
Geospat Health. 2015 May 18;10(1):322
pubmed: 26054517
Trends Parasitol. 2016 Mar;32(3):187-196
pubmed: 26826784
J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 27;223(12 Suppl 2):S61-S80
pubmed: 33906221
Bull World Health Organ. 1951;4(3):419-41
pubmed: 14886721
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002 Jun;66(6):804-11
pubmed: 12224596
Malar J. 2018 Dec 5;17(1):454
pubmed: 30518395
Acta Trop. 2017 Oct;174:91-96
pubmed: 28684267
Malar J. 2011 Jul 07;10:184
pubmed: 21736750
Exp Parasitol. 1996 Apr;82(3):306-15
pubmed: 8631382
Malar J. 2016 Mar 10;15:156
pubmed: 26969430
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Jun 10;13(1):295
pubmed: 32522290
Malar J. 2018 Jul 16;17(1):264
pubmed: 30012154
Med Vet Entomol. 2008 Jun;22(2):120-3
pubmed: 18498610
Malar J. 2015 Dec 15;14:502
pubmed: 26670881
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Feb;88(2):301-8
pubmed: 23249685
Malar J. 2015 Jun 24;14:254
pubmed: 26104657
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):413
pubmed: 30134861
Tanzan J Health Res. 2010 Jan;12(1):68-72
pubmed: 20737831
Malar J. 2019 May 22;18(1):179
pubmed: 31118028
Malar J. 2015 Apr 21;14:170
pubmed: 25895674
Bull World Health Organ. 1969 Apr;40(4):547-60
pubmed: 5306720
Malar J. 2015 Jan 21;14:17
pubmed: 25604150
J Infect Dis. 2012 Nov 15;206(10):1622-9
pubmed: 22966127
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 25;16(6):e0252690
pubmed: 34170917
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 09;5:17952
pubmed: 26648001
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993 Oct;49(4):520-9
pubmed: 8214283
BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 20;14:1190
pubmed: 25409682
Malar J. 2010 Feb 26;9:62
pubmed: 20187956
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Feb;108(2):84-91
pubmed: 24463582
Public Health Action. 2018 Apr 25;8(Suppl 1):S44-S49
pubmed: 29713594
Curr Trop Med Rep. 2018;5(1):41-50
pubmed: 29629252
Parasit Vectors. 2011 Mar 21;4:40
pubmed: 21418622
PLoS One. 2013 May 07;8(5):e63350
pubmed: 23667604