Predicting group benefits in joint multiple object tracking : Predicting group benefits.

Coordination Joint action Multiple object tracking Social cognition

Journal

Attention, perception & psychophysics
ISSN: 1943-393X
Titre abrégé: Atten Percept Psychophys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101495384

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
accepted: 03 03 2023
medline: 4 10 2023
pubmed: 6 7 2023
entrez: 6 7 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In everyday life, people often work together to accomplish a joint goal. Working together is often beneficial as it can result in a higher performance compared to working alone - a so-called "group benefit". While several factors influencing group benefits have been investigated in a range of tasks, to date, they have not been examined collectively with an integrative statistical approach such as linear modeling. To address this gap in the literature, we investigated several factors that are highly relevant for group benefits (i.e., task feedback, information about the co-actor's actions, the similarity in the individual performances, and personality traits) and used these factors as predictors in a linear model to predict group benefits in a joint multiple object tracking (MOT) task. In the joint MOT task, pairs of participants jointly tracked the movements of target objects among distractor objects and, depending on the experiment, either received group performance feedback, individual performance feedback, information about the group member's performed actions, or a combination of these types of information. We found that predictors collectively account for half of the variance and make non-redundant contributions towards predicting group benefits, suggesting that they independently influence group benefits. The model also accurately predicts group benefits, suggesting that it could be used to anticipate group benefits for individuals that have not yet performed a joint task together. Given that the investigated factors are relevant for other joint tasks, our model provides a first step towards developing a more general model for predicting group benefits across several shared tasks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37410254
doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02693-6
pii: 10.3758/s13414-023-02693-6
pmc: PMC10545603
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1962-1975

Subventions

Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : Research Fellowship for BW
Organisme : Ministerium für Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen
ID : Cooperative research project INTERACT!
Organisme : Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
ID : awarded to AK

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Aug;22(4):1076-82
pubmed: 25416077
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22660
pubmed: 21818361
Psychol Res. 2023 Jul;87(5):1323-1333
pubmed: 36378344
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 15;11(12):e0168087
pubmed: 27977762
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 07;9:918
pubmed: 29930528
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Sep;29(5):1006-16
pubmed: 14516231
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;5(6):649-63
pubmed: 26161882
Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):365-6
pubmed: 16683920
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 30;10(11):e0143469
pubmed: 26619079
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):411-7
pubmed: 19293115
Front Psychol. 2017 May 03;8:669
pubmed: 28515704
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 25;10:361
pubmed: 30858814
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 30;8(1):6711
pubmed: 29712917
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 12;13(1):e0191179
pubmed: 29329331
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Jan;212:103205
pubmed: 33202313
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Sep;12(3):460-78
pubmed: 22535515
Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1465-77
pubmed: 17617394
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Feb;10(2):70-6
pubmed: 16406326
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Aug 16;4(8):170193
pubmed: 28878973
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 19;110(8):2763-8
pubmed: 23382227
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 10;110(50):20046-50
pubmed: 24277821
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jul;82(5):2415-2433
pubmed: 31989452
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Sep;47(9):1166-1181
pubmed: 34694847
Science. 2010 Aug 27;329(5995):1081-5
pubmed: 20798320
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 22;279(1729):780-6
pubmed: 21775334
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 09;6:962
pubmed: 26217281
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29081
pubmed: 22279526
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 May 12;:
pubmed: 29754443

Auteurs

Basil Wahn (B)

Institute of Educational Research, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany. basil.wahn@rub.de.
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. basil.wahn@rub.de.
Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany. basil.wahn@rub.de.
Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, Center of Experimental Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. basil.wahn@rub.de.

Peter König (P)

Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, Center of Experimental Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Alan Kingstone (A)

Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH