A Mental Health and Well-Being Chatbot: User Event Log Analysis.
conversational agent
conversational user interface
data analysis
digital health application
digital intervention
ecological momentary assessment
event log analysis
health care
mental well-being
mobile health app
positive psychology
user behavior
user data
user interface
Journal
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
ISSN: 2291-5222
Titre abrégé: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101624439
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jul 2023
06 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
28
09
2022
accepted:
23
01
2023
revised:
20
12
2022
medline:
10
7
2023
pubmed:
6
7
2023
entrez:
6
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Conversational user interfaces, or chatbots, are becoming more popular in the realm of digital health and well-being. While many studies focus on measuring the cause or effect of a digital intervention on people's health and well-being (outcomes), there is a need to understand how users really engage and use a digital intervention in the real world. In this study, we examine the user logs of a mental well-being chatbot called ChatPal, which is based on the concept of positive psychology. The aim of this research is to analyze the log data from the chatbot to provide insight into usage patterns, the different types of users using clustering, and associations between the usage of the app's features. Log data from ChatPal was analyzed to explore usage. A number of user characteristics including user tenure, unique days, mood logs recorded, conversations accessed, and total number of interactions were used with k-means clustering to identify user archetypes. Association rule mining was used to explore links between conversations. ChatPal log data revealed 579 individuals older than 18 years used the app with most users being female (n=387, 67%). User interactions peaked around breakfast, lunchtime, and early evening. Clustering revealed 3 groups including "abandoning users" (n=473), "sporadic users" (n=93), and "frequent transient users" (n=13). Each cluster had distinct usage characteristics, and the features were significantly different (P<.001) across each group. While all conversations within the chatbot were accessed at least once by users, the "treat yourself like a friend" conversation was the most popular, which was accessed by 29% (n=168) of users. However, only 11.7% (n=68) of users repeated this exercise more than once. Analysis of transitions between conversations revealed strong links between "treat yourself like a friend," "soothing touch," and "thoughts diary" among others. Association rule mining confirmed these 3 conversations as having the strongest linkages and suggested other associations between the co-use of chatbot features. This study has provided insight into the types of people using the ChatPal chatbot, patterns of use, and associations between the usage of the app's features, which can be used to further develop the app by considering the features most accessed by users.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Conversational user interfaces, or chatbots, are becoming more popular in the realm of digital health and well-being. While many studies focus on measuring the cause or effect of a digital intervention on people's health and well-being (outcomes), there is a need to understand how users really engage and use a digital intervention in the real world.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
In this study, we examine the user logs of a mental well-being chatbot called ChatPal, which is based on the concept of positive psychology. The aim of this research is to analyze the log data from the chatbot to provide insight into usage patterns, the different types of users using clustering, and associations between the usage of the app's features.
METHODS
METHODS
Log data from ChatPal was analyzed to explore usage. A number of user characteristics including user tenure, unique days, mood logs recorded, conversations accessed, and total number of interactions were used with k-means clustering to identify user archetypes. Association rule mining was used to explore links between conversations.
RESULTS
RESULTS
ChatPal log data revealed 579 individuals older than 18 years used the app with most users being female (n=387, 67%). User interactions peaked around breakfast, lunchtime, and early evening. Clustering revealed 3 groups including "abandoning users" (n=473), "sporadic users" (n=93), and "frequent transient users" (n=13). Each cluster had distinct usage characteristics, and the features were significantly different (P<.001) across each group. While all conversations within the chatbot were accessed at least once by users, the "treat yourself like a friend" conversation was the most popular, which was accessed by 29% (n=168) of users. However, only 11.7% (n=68) of users repeated this exercise more than once. Analysis of transitions between conversations revealed strong links between "treat yourself like a friend," "soothing touch," and "thoughts diary" among others. Association rule mining confirmed these 3 conversations as having the strongest linkages and suggested other associations between the co-use of chatbot features.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study has provided insight into the types of people using the ChatPal chatbot, patterns of use, and associations between the usage of the app's features, which can be used to further develop the app by considering the features most accessed by users.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37410539
pii: v11i1e43052
doi: 10.2196/43052
pmc: PMC10360018
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e43052Informations de copyright
©Frederick Booth, Courtney Potts, Raymond Bond, Maurice Mulvenna, Catrine Kostenius, Indika Dhanapala, Alex Vakaloudis, Brian Cahill, Lauri Kuosmanen, Edel Ennis. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 06.07.2023.
Références
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:55-64
pubmed: 32799105
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 25;21(9):e14567
pubmed: 31573916
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76
pubmed: 25831962
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2013 Jan;40(1):111-20
pubmed: 23093443
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Dec 13;5(4):e64
pubmed: 30545815
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272
pubmed: 32015543
Psychol Bull. 2021 Aug;147(8):749-786
pubmed: 34898233
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 05;21(4):e12887
pubmed: 30950796
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 09;19(5):e151
pubmed: 28487267
Ann Behav Med. 2002 Summer;24(3):244-50
pubmed: 12173682
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;64(7):456-464
pubmed: 30897957
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 23;6(11):e12106
pubmed: 30470676
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 6;8(7):e17120
pubmed: 32420890
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Nov 13;4(11):e17065
pubmed: 33185563
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 21;19(8):e267
pubmed: 28784594
Sleep Sci. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(1):1-7
pubmed: 35662970
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 12;12:703488
pubmed: 34475838
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 6;25:e43051
pubmed: 37410537
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1-32
pubmed: 18509902
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 09;20(2):e49
pubmed: 29426812