Association between biologically effective dose and local control after stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic sarcoma.
SBRT
Sarcoma
biological effective dose
dose
local control
Journal
Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT
ISSN: 2156-4647
Titre abrégé: J Radiosurg SBRT
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101565296
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
23
08
2022
accepted:
28
02
2023
medline:
1
1
2022
pubmed:
1
1
2022
entrez:
7
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized for patients with recurrent and metastatic sarcoma. SBRT affords the potential to overcome the relative radioresistance of sarcomas through delivery of a focused high biological effective dose (BED) as an alternative to invasive surgery. We report local control outcomes after metastatic sarcoma SBRT based on radiation dose and histology. From our IRB-approved single-institution registry, all patients treated with SBRT for metastatic sarcoma between 2014 and 2020 were identified. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate local control and overall survival at 1 and 2 years. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to determine optimal BED using an α/β ratio of 3. Local control was compared by SBRT dose using the BED cut point and evaluated by histology. Forty-two patients with a total of 138 lesions met inclusion criteria. Median imaging follow up was 7.73 months (range 0.5-35.0). Patients were heavily pre-treated with systemic therapy. Median SBRT prescription was 116.70 Gy BED (range 66.70-419.30). Desmoplastic small round cell tumor, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and small round blue cell sarcomas were classified as radiosensitive ( There is a significant local control benefit for sarcoma SBRT when a BED > 95 Gy is used. Further investigation into the dose-response relationship is warranted to maximize the therapeutic index.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
265-273Informations de copyright
© 2023 Old City Publishing, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Authors’ declaration of potential conflicts of interest The authors have nothing to disclose.
Références
Sarcoma. 2021 Apr 17;2021:6681741
pubmed: 33953640
Semin Oncol. 2014 Dec;41(6):848-59
pubmed: 25499642
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jan 01;7(1):e205865
pubmed: 33180100
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 18;8(16):27428-27439
pubmed: 28404969
Cancer. 2021 Mar 1;127(5):739-747
pubmed: 33170960
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):513-24
pubmed: 17540303
Cancer. 2010 Jan 15;116(2):443-50
pubmed: 19924786
Radiat Res. 2021 Jul 1;196(1):23-30
pubmed: 33914890
Am J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec;30(6):637-44
pubmed: 18091059
Stat Med. 2020 Oct 30;39(24):3373-3396
pubmed: 32687225
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Feb;18(2):202-211
pubmed: 27993569
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Apr 1;109(5):1396-1405
pubmed: 33259934
Curr Oncol Rep. 2020 Nov 16;23(1):3
pubmed: 33196879
Cancer J. 2013 May-Jun;19(3):200-7
pubmed: 23708066
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Jan;14(1):18-28
pubmed: 11977013
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Nov 29;:1-8
pubmed: 31783349
Int J Radiat Biol. 2014 Aug;90(8):615-21
pubmed: 24527669
Am J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;44(3):126-130
pubmed: 33405479
Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Jan 10;15(1):927-43
pubmed: 24434638
Transl Oncol. 2021 Oct;14(10):101165
pubmed: 34246048
Sarcoma. 2018 Nov 01;2018:8029157
pubmed: 30515050
Med Oncol. 2012 Dec;29(5):3431-9
pubmed: 22815154
Sarcoma. 2010;2010:927972
pubmed: 20224682
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2013 Jan;25(1):27-35
pubmed: 22990007
Surg Clin North Am. 2016 Oct;96(5):1107-25
pubmed: 27542645
Sarcoma. 2014;2014:418270
pubmed: 25548538