Male facial rejuvenation using a combination 633, 830, and 1072 nm LED face mask.
Aesthetics
Face mask
LED
Low level laser therapy
Photobiomodulation
Skin rejuvenation
Journal
Archives of dermatological research
ISSN: 1432-069X
Titre abrégé: Arch Dermatol Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8000462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
31
03
2023
accepted:
25
06
2023
revised:
23
05
2023
medline:
22
9
2023
pubmed:
7
7
2023
entrez:
7
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Home-based photobiomodulation is a popular treatment modality for patients seeking non-invasive aesthetic treatment. Studies demonstrate that photobiomodulation is effective for skin rejuvenation, which is aimed at improving the overall appearance of the skin by reducing fine lines and wrinkles and improving skin texture, skin tone, and dyspigmentation. Most current skin rejuvenation research focuses on treatments in women. However, men's aesthetics remains an underserved market. A combined red light (RL) and near-infrared (NIR) light-emitting diode (LED) has been designed specifically to target male skin, which may have different physiological and biophysical properties compared to female skin. Herein, the safety and efficacy of a commercially available RL and NIR (633, 830, and 1072 nm) LED array designed to be worn as a face mask was assessed. Primary outcomes included adverse events and facial rejuvenation as determined by participant-reported satisfaction scales and quantitative digital skin photography and computer analysis after 6 weeks of treatment. The participants reported overall favorable results and improvements in all individual categories, were satisfied with the treatment, and would recommend the product to others. The participants perceived the greatest improvement in fine lines and wrinkles, skin texture, and youthful appearance. Photographic digital analysis demonstrated favorable improvements in wrinkles, UV spots, brown spots, pores, and porphyrins. These results support the use of RL and NIR to treat male skin. Advantages of the LED facemask include its safety, efficacy, convenient home-based use, minimal associated downtime, simple operation, non-invasiveness, and appreciable results in as few as 6 weeks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37418018
doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02663-w
pii: 10.1007/s00403-023-02663-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2605-2611Informations de copyright
© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Références
Glass GE (2021) Photobiomodulation: the clinical applications of low-level light therapy. Aesthet Surg J 41(6):723–738
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab025
pubmed: 33471046
Mosca RC, Ong AA, Albasha O, Bass K, Arany P (2019) Photobiomodulation therapy for wound care: a potent, noninvasive photoceutical approach. Adv Skin Wound Care 32(4):157–167
doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000553600.97572.d2
pubmed: 30889017
Kuffler DP (2016) Photobiomodulation in promoting wound healing: a review. Regen Med 11(1):107–122
doi: 10.2217/rme.15.82
pubmed: 26681143
Ramos RM, Burland M, Silva JB et al (2019) Photobiomodulation improved the first stages of wound healing process after abdominoplasty: an experimental, double-blinded non-randomized clinical trial. Aesthet Plast Surg 43(1):147–154
doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1271-2
Cohen M, Austin E, Masub N, Kurtti A, George C, Jagdeo J (2022) Home-based devices in dermatology: a systematic review of safety and efficacy. Arch Dermatol Res 314(3):239–246
doi: 10.1007/s00403-021-02231-0
pubmed: 33938981
Houreld NN (2019) The use of lasers and light sources in skin rejuvenation. Clin Dermatol 37(4):358–364
doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.04.008
pubmed: 31345324
Mota LR, Duarte IDS, Galache TR et al (2023) Photobiomodulation reduces periocular wrinkle volume by 30%: a randomized controlled trial. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg 41(2):48–56
pubmed: 36780572
Bhat J, Birch J, Whitehurst C, Lanigan SW (2005) A single-blinded randomised controlled study to determine the efficacy of Omnilux Revive facial treatment in skin rejuvenation. Lasers Med Sci 20(1):6–10
doi: 10.1007/s10103-005-0330-5
pubmed: 15909229
Russell BA, Kellett N, Reilly LR (2005) A study to determine the efficacy of combination LED light therapy (633 nm and 830 nm) in facial skin rejuvenation. J Cosmet Laser Ther 7(3–4):196–200
doi: 10.1080/14764170500370059
pubmed: 16414908
Sadick NS (2008) A study to determine the efficacy of a novel handheld light-emitting diode device in the treatment of photoaged skin. J Cosmet Dermatol 7(4):263–267
doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2008.00404.x
pubmed: 19146602
Baez F, Reilly LR (2007) The use of light-emitting diode therapy in the treatment of photoaged skin. J Cosmet Dermatol 6(3):189–194
doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2007.00329.x
pubmed: 17760698
Jagdeo J, Keaney T, Narurkar V, Kolodziejczyk J, Gallagher CJ (2016) Facial treatment preferences among aesthetically oriented men. Dermatol Surg 42(10):1155–1163
doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000876
pubmed: 27661428
Jagdeo J (2015) Commentary on evolution of facial aesthetic treatment over five or more years. Dermatol Surg 41(7):848–849
doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000373
pubmed: 26035045
Fabi S, Alexiades M, Chatrath V et al (2022) Facial aesthetic priorities and concerns: a physician and patient perception global survey. Aesthet Surg J 42(4):218–229
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab358
Albornoz CA, Nichols SE, Wang JV, Saedi N, Munavalli GS (2022) Optimizing skin tightening in aesthetics in men. Clin Dermatol 40(3):244–248
doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.11.005
pubmed: 34838655
Glass GE (2021) Photobiomodulation: a review of the molecular evidence for low level light therapy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 74(5):1050–1060
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.059
pubmed: 33436333
Stirling RJ, Haslam JD (2007) A self-reported clinical trial investigates the efficacy of 1072 nm light as an anti-ageing agent. J Cosmet Laser Ther 9(4):226–230
doi: 10.1080/14764170701400085
pubmed: 17852628
Lukac M, Zabkar J, Gorjan M, Grad L, Vizintin Z (2010) Beyond customary paradigm: FRAC3
Cencic B, Lukac M, Marincek M, Vizintin Z (2010) High fluence, high beam quality Q-switched Nd:YAG laser with optoflex delivery system for treating benign pigmented lesions and tattoos. Laser Health 9–18
Infante VHP, Bagatin E, Maia CP (2021) Skin photoaging in young men: a clinical study by skin imaging techniques. Int J Cosmet Sci 43(3):341–351
doi: 10.1111/ics.12701
pubmed: 33728691
Souza C, Maia Campos P, Schanzer S et al (2017) Radical-scavenging activity of a sunscreen enriched by antioxidants providing protection in the whole solar spectral range. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 30(2):81–89
doi: 10.1159/000458158
pubmed: 28319939
Cadet J, Douki T, Ravanat JL (2015) Oxidatively generated damage to cellular DNA by UVB and UVA radiation. Photochem Photobiol 91(1):140–155
doi: 10.1111/php.12368
pubmed: 25327445
Mineroff J, Austin E, Jagdeo J (2002) Cutaneous effects of photobiomodulation with 1072 nm light. Arch Dermatol Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02480-7
doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02480-7
Wang JY, Austin E, Jagdeo J (2022) Visible red light does not induce DNA damage in human dermal fibroblasts. J Biophotonics 15(11):e202200023
doi: 10.1002/jbio.202200023
pubmed: 35894162
Austin E, Geisler AN, Nguyen J et al (2021) Visible light. Part I: properties and cutaneous effects of visible light. J Am Acad Dermatol 84(5):1219–1231
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.02.048
pubmed: 33640508
pmcid: 8887026
Jagdeo J, Nguyen JK, Ho D et al (2020) Safety of light emitting diode-red light on human skin: two randomized controlled trials. J Biophotonics 13(3):e201960014
doi: 10.1002/jbio.201960014
pubmed: 31483941
Taylor SC, Alexis AF, Armstrong AW, Chiesa Fuxench ZC, Lim HW (2022) Misconceptions of photoprotection in skin of color. J Am Acad Dermatol 86(3s):S9-s17
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.12.020
pubmed: 34942293
Kohli I, Braunberger TL, Nahhas AF et al (2020) Long-wavelength ultraviolet al and visible light photoprotection: a multimodality assessment of dose and response. Photochem Photobiol 96(1):208–214
doi: 10.1111/php.13157
pubmed: 31464341
Geisler AN, Austin E, Nguyen J, Hamzavi I, Jagdeo J, Lim HW (2021) Visible light. Part II: photoprotection against visible and ultraviolet light. J Am Acad Dermatol 84(5):1233–1244
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.11.074
pubmed: 33640513
pmcid: 8887048
Joensen J, Demmink JH, Johnson MI, Iversen VV, Lopes-Martins R, Bjordal JM (2011) The thermal effects of therapeutic lasers with 810 and 904 nm wavelengths on human skin. Photomed Laser Surg 29(3):145–153
doi: 10.1089/pho.2010.2793
pubmed: 21219241
Swift A, Liew S, Weinkle S, Garcia JK, Silberberg MB (2021) The facial aging process from the “Inside Out.” Aesthet Surg J 41(10):1107–1119
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa339
pubmed: 33325497
Hogan SR, Zachary CB, Arndt KA (2021) Prejuvenation: definition of the term and evolution of the concept. Dermatol Surg 47(6):871–872
doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002929
pubmed: 33481436