Event-by-event approach to the oxygen-effect-incorporated stochastic microdosimetric kinetic model for hypofractionated multi-ion therapy.
biological model
hypoxia
multi-ion therapy
oxygen enhancement ratio
Journal
Journal of radiation research
ISSN: 1349-9157
Titre abrégé: J Radiat Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376611
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Jul 2023
18 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
11
02
2023
revised:
26
05
2023
accepted:
19
06
2023
medline:
21
7
2023
pubmed:
8
7
2023
entrez:
8
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
An oxygen-effect-incorporated stochastic microdosimetric kinetic (OSMK) model was previously developed to estimate the survival fraction of cells exposed to charged-particle beams with wide dose and linear energy transfer (LET) ranges under various oxygen conditions. In the model, hypoxia-induced radioresistance was formulated based on the dose-averaged radiation quality. This approximation may cause inaccuracy in the estimation of the biological effectiveness of the radiation with wide variation in energy deposited to a sensitive volume per event, such as spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) beams. The purpose of this study was to apply an alternative approach so as to consider the energy depositions on an event-by-event basis. The production probability of radiation-induced lesions per energy was formulated with oxygen partial pressure to account for the hypoxia-induced radioresistance. The reduction in the oxygen enhancement ratio for high-LET radiations was modeled by reducing the sensitive-volume size and increasing the saturation energy in microdosimetry. The modified OSMK model was tested against the reported survival data of three cell lines exposed to six species of ions with wide dose and LET ranges under aerobic and hypoxic conditions. The model reasonably reproduced the reported cell survival data. To evaluate the event-by-event approach, survival distributions of Chinese hamster ovary cells exposed to SOBP beams were estimated using the original and modified OSMK models. The differences in the estimated survival distributions between the models were marginal even under extreme hypoxia. The event-by-event approach improved the theoretical validity of the OSMK model. However, the original OSMK model can still provide an accurate estimation of the biological effectiveness of therapeutic radiations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37421442
pii: 7221120
doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrad049
pmc: PMC10354861
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Ions
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
685-692Subventions
Organisme : JST ERATO
ID : JPMJER20102
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Organisme : Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
ID : 20K08013
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
Références
Radiat Res. 2000 Nov;154(5):485-96
pubmed: 11025645
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Oct 11;66(20):
pubmed: 34560678
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Sep 21;59(18):5361-86
pubmed: 25157579
Radiat Res. 1994 Dec;140(3):366-74
pubmed: 7972689
Br J Radiol. 1978 Sep;51(609):712-9
pubmed: 698514
Radiat Res. 2001 May;155(5):698-702
pubmed: 11302767
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 24;5:17016
pubmed: 26596243
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Nov 7;61(21):7586-7599
pubmed: 27716637
Phys Med Biol. 1986 Nov;31(11):1201-9
pubmed: 3786407
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jun 21;62(12):5180-5197
pubmed: 28333688
Int J Radiat Biol. 1999 Apr;75(4):505-12
pubmed: 10331856
Radiat Res. 2006 Oct;166(4):629-38
pubmed: 17007551
Nature. 1956 Nov 3;178(4540):978-9
pubmed: 13378491
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Dec 14;63(1):015008
pubmed: 29240558
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Apr 1;12(7 Pt 1):2185-90
pubmed: 16609033
Radiat Res. 2009 Dec;172(6):761-76
pubmed: 19929423
Radiat Res. 2012 Oct;178(4):341-56
pubmed: 22880622
Int J Radiat Biol. 1996 Jun;69(6):739-55
pubmed: 8691026
Phys Med Biol. 2022 Oct 21;67(21):
pubmed: 35961294
Radiat Environ Biophys. 1976 Oct 7;13(3):215-27
pubmed: 981514
Phys Med Biol. 2022 Jun 21;67(13):
pubmed: 35667368
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jan 7;60(1):437-51
pubmed: 25658007
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Feb 09;66(4):045017
pubmed: 33361575
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Nov 21;55(22):6721-37
pubmed: 21030747
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jan 7;60(1):421-35
pubmed: 25658006
Phys Med Biol. 2018 May 04;63(9):095011
pubmed: 29726401
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Apr 21;60(8):3271-86
pubmed: 25826534
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Jan 17;65(2):025004
pubmed: 31816612
Radiat Res. 2022 Sep 1;198(3):255-262
pubmed: 35738014
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Feb 12;65(4):045005
pubmed: 31968318
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Feb 12;66(5):
pubmed: 33477116
Radiat Res. 1997 May;147(5):541-50
pubmed: 9146699
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jun 7;58(11):3871-95
pubmed: 23681217