Posterior Fixation for Different Thoracic-Sacrum Alignments Containing a Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture: A Finite Element Analysis.

Finite element analysis Posterior spinal instrumentation fixation Spine alignment Stress Thoracolumbar vertebral fracture

Journal

World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 10 05 2023
revised: 28 06 2023
accepted: 29 06 2023
pubmed: 9 7 2023
medline: 9 7 2023
entrez: 8 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Thoracolumbar vertebral fractures are one of the most common fractures; however, there is a lack of mechanical analyses for what the posterior fixation is for different spine alignments. This study used a three-dimensional finite element model of a T1-sacrum. Three alignment models were created: intact, degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS), and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The burst fracture was assumed to be at the L1 vertebral level. Posterior fixation models with pedicle screws (PS) were constructed for each model: 1 vertebra above to 1 below PS (4PS) and 1 vertebra above to 1 below PS with additional short PS at the L1 (6PS); intact-burst-4PS, intact-burst-6PS, DLS-burst-4PS, DLS-burst-6PS, AIS-burst-4PS, and AIS-burst-6PS models. T1 was loaded with a moment of 4 Nm assuming flexion and extension. The vertebrae stress varied with spinal alignment. The stress of L1 in intact burst (IB), DLS burst, and AIS burst increased by more than 190% compared with each nonfractured model. L1 stress in IB, DLS, and AIS-4PS increased to more than 47% compared with each nonfractured model. L1 stress in IB, DLS, and AIS-6PS increased to more than 25% compared with each nonfractured model. In flexion and extension, stress on the screws and rods of intact-burst-6PS, DLS-6PS, and AIS-6PS was lower than in the intact-burst-4PS, DLS-4PS, and AIS-4PS models. It may be more beneficial to use 6PS compared with 4PS to reduce stresses on the fractured vertebrae and instrumentation, regardless of the spinal alignment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37422188
pii: S1878-8750(23)00922-1
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.06.137
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Norihiro Nishida (N)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan. Electronic address: nishida3@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp.

Hidenori Suzuki (H)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Fei Jiang (F)

Faculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Yuki Fuchigami (Y)

Faculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Rui Tome (R)

Faculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Masahiro Funaba (M)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Yogesh Kumaran (Y)

Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence (E-CORE), Departments of Bioengineering and Orthopaedics, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.

Kazuhiro Fujimoto (K)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Hiroaki Ikeda (H)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Junji Ohgi (J)

Faculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Xian Chen (X)

Faculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Takashi Sakai (T)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Classifications MeSH