Relationship between gait parameter and spinal sagittal profiles in asymptomatic subjects.
Asymptomatic volunteer
Gait analysis
Gait parameters
Pelvic incidence
Sagittal profiles
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jul 2023
08 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
16
12
2022
accepted:
28
06
2023
medline:
10
7
2023
pubmed:
9
7
2023
entrez:
8
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To study the gait parameters in asymptomatic volunteers and investigate the correlation between the gait and several radiographic sagittal profiles. Asymptomatic volunteers (20-50 years of age) were included and allocated into three subgroups depending on pelvic incidence (low, normal, and high). Standing whole spine radiographs and gait analysis data were obtained. The Pearson Coefficient Correlation was used to determine the relationship between the gait and radiographic profiles. A total of 55 volunteers (28 male and 27 females) were included. The mean age was 27.35 ± 6.37 years old. The average sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL) were 37.78 ± 6.59, 14.51 ± 9.19 degrees, and 52.29 ± 10.87 degrees and - 0.36 ± 11.41, respectively. The mean velocity and stride of all the volunteers were 119.00 ± 30.12 cm/s and 130.25 ± 7.72 cm, correspondingly. The correlation between each of the radiographical and gait parameters was low (ranging from - 0.24 to 0.26). Gait parameters were not differenced significantly between each of the PI subgroups in asymptomatic volunteers. Spinal sagittal parameters also showed a low correlation with gait parameters.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To study the gait parameters in asymptomatic volunteers and investigate the correlation between the gait and several radiographic sagittal profiles.
METHODS
METHODS
Asymptomatic volunteers (20-50 years of age) were included and allocated into three subgroups depending on pelvic incidence (low, normal, and high). Standing whole spine radiographs and gait analysis data were obtained. The Pearson Coefficient Correlation was used to determine the relationship between the gait and radiographic profiles.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 55 volunteers (28 male and 27 females) were included. The mean age was 27.35 ± 6.37 years old. The average sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL) were 37.78 ± 6.59, 14.51 ± 9.19 degrees, and 52.29 ± 10.87 degrees and - 0.36 ± 11.41, respectively. The mean velocity and stride of all the volunteers were 119.00 ± 30.12 cm/s and 130.25 ± 7.72 cm, correspondingly. The correlation between each of the radiographical and gait parameters was low (ranging from - 0.24 to 0.26).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Gait parameters were not differenced significantly between each of the PI subgroups in asymptomatic volunteers. Spinal sagittal parameters also showed a low correlation with gait parameters.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37422642
doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06672-8
pii: 10.1186/s12891-023-06672-8
pmc: PMC10329316
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
559Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Asian Spine J. 2022 Feb;16(1):107-118
pubmed: 33957746
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Jul;53:241-243
pubmed: 29731277
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Dec;105(6):490-7
pubmed: 9448652
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 May 1;30(9):1082-5
pubmed: 15864163
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Aug 1;39(17):1401-7
pubmed: 24859590
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Mar;(384):35-44
pubmed: 11249178
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Jul-Aug;40(4):361-6
pubmed: 15074447
Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5:602-8
pubmed: 21830081
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 15;30(6):682-8
pubmed: 15770185
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 15;29(18):2049-54
pubmed: 15371707
Spine J. 2017 Mar;17(3):409-417
pubmed: 27765712
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jan 1;42(1):E25-E30
pubmed: 27220034
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jul 1;44(13):E759-E765
pubmed: 31205168
Eur Spine J. 2002 Feb;11(1):80-7
pubmed: 11931071
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Aug 15;24(16):1712-20
pubmed: 10472106
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 15;28(16):1836-43; discussion 1844
pubmed: 12923471
Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):372-7
pubmed: 24011797
Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5:641-6
pubmed: 21809015
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jan 15;45(2):79-87
pubmed: 31899690
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Oct;27(10):3077-9
pubmed: 26644647
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jan 1;39(1):E1-6
pubmed: 24270931
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 1;31(25):E959-67
pubmed: 17139212
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Feb;24(2):190-5
pubmed: 19091448
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 1;27(1):59-64
pubmed: 11805637
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e488-e496
pubmed: 30149177
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Feb 12;13(1):34
pubmed: 29433530
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jul;23(7):1400-6
pubmed: 24610236
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25):E1648-54
pubmed: 21394071
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30(2):210-23
pubmed: 8035350
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Jun;159(6):1119-1128
pubmed: 28185071
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jun 15;20(12):1351-8
pubmed: 7676332
Gait Posture. 2020 Feb;76:318-326
pubmed: 31891899
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Jul;14(7):717-21
pubmed: 2772721