Development of an automated, general-purpose prediction tool for postoperative respiratory failure using machine learning: A retrospective cohort study.

Machine learning Perioperative medicine Postoperative respiratory failure Preoperative prediction

Journal

Journal of clinical anesthesia
ISSN: 1873-4529
Titre abrégé: J Clin Anesth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8812166

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2023
Historique:
received: 13 12 2022
revised: 13 06 2023
accepted: 26 06 2023
pmc-release: 01 11 2024
medline: 12 9 2023
pubmed: 10 7 2023
entrez: 9 7 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Postoperative respiratory failure is a major surgical complication and key quality metric. Existing prediction tools underperform, are limited to specific populations, and necessitate manual calculation. This limits their implementation. We aimed to create an improved, machine learning powered prediction tool with ideal characteristics for automated calculation. We retrospectively reviewed 101,455 anesthetic procedures from 1/2018 to 6/2021. The primary outcome was the Standardized Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine consensus definition for postoperative respiratory failure. Secondary outcomes were respiratory quality metrics from the National Surgery Quality Improvement Sample, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and CMS. We abstracted from the electronic health record 26 procedural and physiologic variables previously identified as respiratory failure risk factors. We randomly split the cohort and used the Random Forest method to predict the composite outcome in the training cohort. We coined this the RESPIRE model and measured its accuracy in the validation cohort using area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) analysis, among other measures, and compared this with ARISCAT and SPORC-1, two leading prediction tools. We compared performance in a validation cohort using score cut-offs determined in a separate test cohort. The RESPIRE model exhibited superior accuracy with an AUROC of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95) compared to 0.82 for both ARISCAT and SPORC-1 (P-for-difference < 0.0001 for both). At comparable 80-90% sensitivities, RESPIRE had higher positive predictive value (11%, 95% CI: 10-12%) and lower false positive rate (12%, 95% CI: 12-13%) compared to 4% and 37% for both ARISCAT and SPORC-1. The RESPIRE model also better predicted the established quality metrics for postoperative respiratory failure. We developed a general-purpose, machine learning powered prediction tool with superior performance for research and quality-based definitions of postoperative respiratory failure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37422982
pii: S0952-8180(23)00144-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111194
pmc: PMC10529165
mid: NIHMS1915403
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anesthetics 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111194

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : UH2 HL125119
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : UH3 HL125119
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : UH3 HL140177
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002556
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Feb;29(2):203-205
pubmed: 30412455
JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):157-166
pubmed: 27829093
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Dec;12(12):1831-6
pubmed: 26393984
BMC Surg. 2021 Nov 6;21(1):393
pubmed: 34740362
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):317-334
pubmed: 28186222
Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1338-50
pubmed: 21045639
Crit Care Med. 2005 Jun;33(6):1266-71
pubmed: 15942342
Stat Med. 1999 Mar 30;18(6):681-94
pubmed: 10204197
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb 15;205(4):440-449
pubmed: 34813391
Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9
pubmed: 16224307
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 01;(8):CD008930
pubmed: 25081420
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Jul;4(7):e520-e531
pubmed: 35750401
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Mar;58(5):688-96
pubmed: 24218103
Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):1066-1079
pubmed: 29661384
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Dec;123(6):898-913
pubmed: 31587835
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Aug 28;9(1):96
pubmed: 31463598
Anesthesiology. 2015 Sep;123(3):692-713
pubmed: 26120769
Anesthesiology. 2017 May;126(5):882-889
pubmed: 28296682
Chest. 2011 Nov;140(5):1207-1215
pubmed: 21757571
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 27;16(8):e0256609
pubmed: 34449776
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):581-95
pubmed: 16618956
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1188-98
pubmed: 17544077
J Hosp Med. 2016 Feb;11(2):136-44
pubmed: 26663904
Chest. 2020 Nov;158(5):1934-1946
pubmed: 32615190
Digit Health. 2023 Jan 9;9:20552076221149529
pubmed: 36644663
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Jun;32(3):443-451
pubmed: 30893115
JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1345-53
pubmed: 26975890
Crit Care. 2018 Oct 30;22(1):286
pubmed: 30373653
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Sep;35(9):691-701
pubmed: 29916860
Anesthesiology. 2014 May;120(5):1168-81
pubmed: 24755786
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun 8;:
pubmed: 35690135
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jul;32(7):458-70
pubmed: 26020123
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2131669
pubmed: 34757412
Anaesthesia. 2019 Apr;74(4):457-467
pubmed: 30632138
Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1276-85
pubmed: 23571640
Crit Care Med. 2012 May;40(5):1532-8
pubmed: 22511134
Ann Surg. 2000 Aug;232(2):242-53
pubmed: 10903604
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jul 12;5(1):91
pubmed: 35821515
Anaesthesia. 2019 Sep;74(9):1165-1174
pubmed: 31222727
Anesthesiology. 2011 Jul;115(1):117-28
pubmed: 21694510
Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):368-74
pubmed: 26771782
Chest. 2021 Jun;159(6):2264-2273
pubmed: 33345948
Nat Protoc. 2021 Jun;16(6):2765-2787
pubmed: 33953393
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Feb;128(2):363-374
pubmed: 34916050

Auteurs

Michael E Kiyatkin (ME)

Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. Electronic address: mkiyatkin@montefiore.org.

Boudewijn Aasman (B)

Center for Health Data Innovations, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Melissa J Fazzari (MJ)

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Maíra I Rudolph (MI)

Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Marcos F Vidal Melo (MF)

Department of Anesthesiology, NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Matthias Eikermann (M)

Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Michelle N Gong (MN)

Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH