Comparing performance between clinics of an embryo evaluation algorithm based on time-lapse images and machine learning.
Artificial intelligence
Embryo selection
Model performance
Time-lapse
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
01
05
2023
accepted:
20
06
2023
medline:
22
8
2023
pubmed:
10
7
2023
entrez:
9
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This article aims to assess how differences in maternal age distributions between IVF clinics affect the performance of an artificial intelligence model for embryo viability prediction and proposes a method to account for such differences. Using retrospectively collected data from 4805 fresh and frozen single blastocyst transfers of embryos incubated for 5 to 6 days, the discriminative performance was assessed based on fetal heartbeat outcomes. The data was collected from 4 clinics, and the discrimination was measured in terms of the area under ROC curves (AUC) for each clinic. To account for the different age distributions between clinics, a method for age-standardizing the AUCs was developed in which the clinic-specific AUCs were standardized using weights for each embryo according to the relative frequency of the maternal age in the relevant clinic compared to the age distribution in a common reference population. There was substantial variation in the clinic-specific AUCs with estimates ranging from 0.58 to 0.69 before standardization. The age-standardization of the AUCs reduced the between-clinic variance by 16%. Most notably, three of the clinics had quite similar AUCs after standardization, while the last clinic had a markedly lower AUC both with and without standardization. The method of using age-standardization of the AUCs that is proposed in this article mitigates some of the variability between clinics. This enables a comparison of clinic-specific AUCs where the difference in age distributions is accounted for.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37423932
doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02871-3
pii: 10.1007/s10815-023-02871-3
pmc: PMC10440335
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2129-2137Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
pubmed: 3802833
Hum Reprod Open. 2021 Aug 05;2021(3):hoab026
pubmed: 34377841
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Oct;41(4):585-593
pubmed: 32843306
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Apr 4;2:21
pubmed: 31304368
Fertil Steril. 2020 Nov;114(5):921-926
pubmed: 33160514
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Sep;39(9):2089-2099
pubmed: 35881272
Fertil Steril. 2000 Jun;73(6):1155-8
pubmed: 10856474
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 23;12(5):
pubmed: 36902592
Evid Based Ment Health. 2019 Nov;22(4):153-160
pubmed: 31563865
Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2231-44
pubmed: 27609980
IARC Sci Publ. 1987;(82):1-406
pubmed: 3329634
Reprod Med Biol. 2019 Mar 01;18(2):190-203
pubmed: 30996683
JAMA. 1982 May 14;247(18):2543-6
pubmed: 7069920
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 20;9(3):e92209
pubmed: 24651729
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jul;38(7):1675-1689
pubmed: 34173914
Biometrika. 2009 Jun;96(2):371-382
pubmed: 22822245
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2018 Sep 01;22(3):228-237
pubmed: 29912521
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73
pubmed: 25560730
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Jan;5(1):e28-e40
pubmed: 36543475
Fertil Steril. 2022 Mar;117(3):528-535
pubmed: 34998577
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 14;13(1):4235
pubmed: 36918648
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0262661
pubmed: 35108306
Epidemiology. 2010 Jan;21(1):128-38
pubmed: 20010215
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Dec;45(6):1124-1132
pubmed: 36163224
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jan 15;14:5
pubmed: 24423445
Reprod Biomed Online. 2023 Feb;46(2):274-281
pubmed: 36470714
Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 28;35(4):770-784
pubmed: 32240301
Fertil Steril. 2021 Oct;116(4):1172-1180
pubmed: 34246469