To evaluate responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC) for the Persian versions of FABQ, TSK, and PCS.
FABQ
Minimal important change
PCS
Responsiveness
TSK
Journal
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2023
09 2023
Historique:
received:
23
11
2022
accepted:
19
06
2023
revised:
03
06
2023
medline:
11
9
2023
pubmed:
10
7
2023
entrez:
9
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ), Tampa scale of kinesiophobia (TSK), and pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) are tools widely used to measure fear-avoidance beliefs, fear of movement, and pain-related catastrophic thinking in people with chronic spinal disorders. To evaluate responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC) for the Persian version of FABQ, TSK, and PCS. One hundred people with chronic non-specific neck pain participated in an intervention program including routine physiotherapy plus pain neuroscience education. They fulfilled FABQ, TSK, and PCS questionnaires at baseline and 4-week follow-up. The 7-point global rating of change (GRC) as the external anchor was also completed in follow-up by patients. Responsiveness was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and correlation analysis. According to GRC, patients were classified into two groups (improved vs. unimproved). The best cutoff or MIC was estimated via the ROC curve. Acceptable responsiveness obtained for FABQ, TSK, and PCS with the area under the curve ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 and spearman coefficient > 0.6. The MIC values reflecting improvement were 9.5, 10.5, and 12.5 points, respectively, for FABQ, TSK, and PCS. The results of this study demonstrated that the Persian version of FABQ, TSK, and PCS have sufficient responsiveness and good ability to measure meaningful clinical changes in people with patient CNNP. The MIC scores of the FABQ, TSK, and PCS can help clinicians and researchers to detect changes significant to the patient following a rehabilitation program.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37423940
doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07835-w
pii: 10.1007/s00586-023-07835-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3023-3029Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Kazeminasab S, Nejadghaderi SA, Amiri P, Pourfathi H, Araj-Khodaei M, Sullman MJM, Kolahi A-A, Safiri S (2022) Neck pain: global epidemiology, trends and risk factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04957-4
doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04957-4
pubmed: 34980079
pmcid: 8725362
Crombez G, Vlaeyen JW, Heuts PH, Lysens R (1999) Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain 80:329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00229-2
doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00229-2
pubmed: 10204746
Severeijns R, Vlaeyen JW, van den Hout MA, Weber WE (2001) Pain catastrophizing predicts pain intensity, disability, and psychological distress independent of the level of physical impairment. Clin J Pain 17:165–172. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200106000-00009
doi: 10.1097/00002508-200106000-00009
pubmed: 11444718
Turk DC, Okifuji A (2002) Psychological factors in chronic pain: evolution and revolution. J consul Clin Psychol 70:678. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.70.3.678
doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.3.678
Monticone M, Frigau L, Vernon H, Rocca B, Mola F (2018) Responsiveness and minimal important change of the NeckPix© in subjects with chronic neck pain undergoing rehabilitation. Eur Spine J 27:1324–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5343-9
doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5343-9
pubmed: 29052814
Javdaneh N, Saeterbakken AH, Shams A, Barati AH (2021) Pain neuroscience education combined with therapeutic exercises provides added benefit in the treatment of chronic neck pain. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:8848. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168848
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168848
pubmed: 34444594
pmcid: 8394804
De Souza FS, da Silva MC, Siqueira FB, Maher CG, Costa LOP (2008) Psychometric testing confirms that the Brazilian-Portuguese adaptations, the original versions of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia have similar measurement properties. Spine 33:1028–1033. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8329
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8329
pubmed: 18427325
Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J (2008) Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 61:102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012
pubmed: 18177782
Churruca K, Pomare C, Ellis LA, Long JC, Henderson SB, Murphy LE, Leahy CJ, Braithwaite J (2021) Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): A review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues. Health Expectat 24:1015–1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13254
doi: 10.1111/hex.13254
Rostami M, Noorian N, Mansournia MA, Sharafi E, Babaki AES, Kordi R (2014) Validation of the Persian version of the fear avoidance belief questionnaire in patients with low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 27:213–221. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-130439
doi: 10.3233/BMR-130439
pubmed: 24254494
Jafari H, Ebrahimi I, Salavati M, Kamali M, Fata L (2010) Psychometric properties of Iranian version of Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in low back pain patients. Archives Rehabil 11:0–0
Raeissadat SA, Sadeghi S, Montazeri A (2013) Validation of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) in Iran. J Basic Appl Sci Res 3:376–380
Mokkink LB (2021) key concepts in epidemiology: Responsiveness, the longitudinal aspect of validity. J Clin Epidemiol 140:159–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.002
pubmed: 34116141
Terwee CB, Peipert JD, Chapman R, Lai J-S, Terluin B, Cella D, Griffith P, Mokkink LB (2021) Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures. Qual Life Res 30:2729–2754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y
doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y
pubmed: 34247326
pmcid: 8481206
Soleiman F, Mohamadi HK, Saadat M, Derisfard F, Nassadj G (2022) A protocol for a randomized trial on pain neuroscience education vs. routine physical therapy in people with chronic neck pain. Eur J Transl Myol 32(3):10674. https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.10674
doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2022.10674
pubmed: 35833895
Burwinkle T, Robinson JP, Turk DC (2005) Fear of movement: factor structure of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. J Pain 6:384–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.355
doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.355
pubmed: 15943960
Pulles AN, Köke AJ, Strackke RP, Smeets RJ (2020) The responsiveness and interpretability of psychosocial patient-reported outcome measures in chronic musculoskeletal pain rehabilitation. Eur J Pain 24:134–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1470
doi: 10.1002/ejp.1470
pubmed: 31408556
Monticone M, Frigau L, Vernon H, Rocca B, Giordano A, Vullo SS, Mola F, Franchignoni F (2020) Reliability, responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the two Fear Avoidance and Beliefs Questionnaire scales in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain undergoing multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 56(5):600–606. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06158-4
doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06158-4
pubmed: 32420712
Mostafaee N, Negahban H, Shaterzadeh Yazdi MJ, Goharpey S, Mehravar M, Pirayeh N (2020) Responsiveness of a Persian version of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Tegner activity scale in athletes with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction following physiotherapy treatment. Physiother Theory Pract 36:1019–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1548672
doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1548672
pubmed: 30468412
Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Rocca B, Foti C, Ferrante S (2016) Responsiveness and minimal clinically important changes for the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia after lumbar fusion during cognitive behavioral rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 53:351–358. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04362-8
doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04362-8
pubmed: 27827516
Huang H, Nagao M, Arita H, Shiozawa J, Nishio H, Kobayashi Y, Kaneko H, Nagayama M, Saita Y, Ishijima M (2019) Reproducibility, responsiveness and validation of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in patients with ACL injuries. Health Qual Life Outcomes 17:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1217-7
doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1217-7
Freeman J, Walters R, Ingram W, Slade A, Hobart J, Zajicek J (2013) Evaluating change in mobility in people with multiple sclerosis: relative responsiveness of four clinical measures. Mult Scler J 19:1632–1639. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458513482373
doi: 10.1177/1352458513482373
Pei L, Xia J, Yan J (2010) Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the chinese version of the fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire. J Int Med Res 38:1985–1996. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001003800612
doi: 10.1177/147323001003800612
pubmed: 21227002
Chaory K, Fayad F, Rannou F, Lefèvre-Colau M-M, Fermanian J, Revel M, Poiraudeau S (2004) Validation of the French version of the fear avoidance belief questionnaire. Spine 29:908–913. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200404150-00018
doi: 10.1097/00007632-200404150-00018
pubmed: 15082995
Staerkle R, Mannion AF, Elfering A, Junge A, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Grob D, Dvorak J, Boos N (2004) Longitudinal validation of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) in a Swiss-German sample of low back pain patients. Eur Spine J 13:332–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0663-3
doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0663-3
pubmed: 14714246
pmcid: 3468043
Monticone M, Portoghese I, Rocca B, Giordano A, Campagna M, Franchignoni F (2021) Responsiveness and minimal important change of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in people with chronic low back pain undergoing multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06729-0
doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06729-0
pubmed: 34636528
pmcid: 9980597
Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Rocca B, Foti C, Ferrante S (2016) Responsiveness of the tampa scale of kinesiophobia in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain undergoing motor and cognitive rehabilitation. Eur Spine J 25:2882–2888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009
pubmed: 27356516
Kamper SJ, Ostelo RW, Knol DL, Maher CG, de Vet HC, Hancock MJ (2010) Global perceived effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol 63:760–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009
pubmed: 20056385