Development and future prospects of the artificial urinary sphincter.
artificial sphincter
artificial urinary sphincter
urinary incontinence
Journal
Artificial organs
ISSN: 1525-1594
Titre abrégé: Artif Organs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802778
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
revised:
15
06
2023
received:
23
04
2023
accepted:
26
06
2023
medline:
15
11
2023
pubmed:
10
7
2023
entrez:
10
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Urinary incontinence is a urinary disorder in which urine leaks out involuntarily. This disorder seriously affects the quality of life of patients. For patients with mild incontinence, conservative treatment and medication may be the ideal treatment modality, but for patients with severe incontinence, an artificial urinary sphincter is currently a better treatment option. In order to design an ideal artificial urinary sphincter, this article first searched and collected literature based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses searched strategy by selecting specific subject terms and reviewed the artificial urinary sphincters that are currently in the research stage based on different activation methods. In response to the deficiencies of the existing artificial urinary sphincter, this article discusses the future optimization of the artificial urinary sphincter from three aspects: individual improvement of the artificial urinary sphincter, engineering design elements, and optimization of the artificial urinary sphincter manufacturing process. The manufacture of an idealized artificial urinary sphincter capable of meeting clinical needs is of great importance to improve the quality of life of patients. However, this approach is a reasonable option to explore and should not be overestimated until further evidence is available.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Urinary incontinence is a urinary disorder in which urine leaks out involuntarily. This disorder seriously affects the quality of life of patients. For patients with mild incontinence, conservative treatment and medication may be the ideal treatment modality, but for patients with severe incontinence, an artificial urinary sphincter is currently a better treatment option.
METHODS
METHODS
In order to design an ideal artificial urinary sphincter, this article first searched and collected literature based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses searched strategy by selecting specific subject terms and reviewed the artificial urinary sphincters that are currently in the research stage based on different activation methods.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In response to the deficiencies of the existing artificial urinary sphincter, this article discusses the future optimization of the artificial urinary sphincter from three aspects: individual improvement of the artificial urinary sphincter, engineering design elements, and optimization of the artificial urinary sphincter manufacturing process.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The manufacture of an idealized artificial urinary sphincter capable of meeting clinical needs is of great importance to improve the quality of life of patients. However, this approach is a reasonable option to explore and should not be overestimated until further evidence is available.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1688-1699Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31900944
Informations de copyright
© 2023 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, Brubaker L. Urinary incontinence in women a review. JAMA. 2017;318:1592-1604.
Davis NJ, Wyman JF, Gubitosa S, Pretty L. Urinary incontinence in older adults. Am J Nurs. 2020;120:57-62.
Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:141-148.
Forde JC, Chughtai B, Cea M, Stone BV, Te A, Bishop TF. Trends in ambulatory management of urinary incontinence in women in the United States EDITORIAL COMMENT. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017;72:651-652.
Aly WW, Sweed HS, Mossad NA, Tolba MF. Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence in frail elderly females. J Aging Res. 2020;2020:2425945.
Przydacz M, Chlosta M, Chlosta P. Population-level prevalence, bother, and treatment behavior for urinary incontinence in an eastern European country: findings from the LUTS Poland study. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2314.
Akbar A, Liu K, Michos ED, Brubaker L, Markossian T, Bancks MP, et al. Racial differences in urinary incontinence prevalence, overactive bladder and associated bother among men: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. J Urol. 2021;205:524-531.
Al Adem KM, Bawazir SS, Hassen WA, Khandoker AH, Khalaf K, McGloughlin T, et al. Implantable systems for stress urinary incontinence. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45:2717-2732.
Lucas MG, Bosch RJ, Burkhard FC, Cruz F, Madden TB, Nambiar AK, et al. EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2012;62:1118-1129.
Borirakchanyavat S, Aboseif SR, Carroll PR, Tanagho EA, Lue TF. Continence mechanism of the isolated female urethra: an anatomical study of the intrapelvic somatic nerves. J Urol. 1997;158:822-826.
Versi E, Cardozo LD, Studd JW, Brincat M, O'Dowd TM, Cooper DJ. Internal urinary sphincter in maintenance of female continence. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292:166-167.
Kwok D, Tse V, Tse V, Chan L, Chan L. Practical anatomy and physiology of urinary continence. In: Chan L, Tse V, editors. Multidisciplinary Care of Urinary Incontinence. London: Springer-Verlag; 2013. p. 7-17.
Foley FE. An artificial sphincter; a new device and operation for control of enuresis and urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1947;58:250-259.
Chartier-Kastler E, Van Kerrebroeck P, Olianas R, Cosson M, Mandron E, Delorme E, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800) implantation for women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a technique for insiders? BJU Int. 2011;107:1618-1626.
Hussain M, Greenwell TJ, Venn SN, Mundy AR. The current role of the artificial urinary sphincter for the treatment of urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2005;174:418-424.
Ratan HL, Summerton DJ, Wilson SK, Terry TR. Development and current status of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter. EAU-EBU Update Series. 2006;4:117-128.
Schiavini JL, Damiao R, de Resende Junior JA, Dornas MC, Lima C, da Costa DS, et al. Treatment of post-prostate surgery urinary incontinence with the periurethral constrictor: a retrospective analysis. Urology. 2010;75:1488-1492.
Vakalopoulos I, Kampantais S, Laskaridis L, Chachopoulos V, Koptsis M, Toutziaris C. New artificial urinary sphincter devices in the treatment of male iatrogenic incontinence. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:439372.
Chung E. Contemporary surgical devices for male stress urinary incontinence: a review of technological advances in current continence surgery. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:S112-S121.
Staerman F, G-Llorens C, Leon P, Leclerc Y. ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter for male urinary incontinence: a preliminary study. BJU Int. 2013;111:E202-E206.
Basiri A, Dadpour M. A case report of the preferred indication for the Zephyr (ZSI 375) artificial urinary sphincter. Urol Case Rep. 2022;43:102058.
Llorens C, Pottek T. Urinary artificial sphincter ZSI 375 for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men: 5 and 7 years follow-up report. Urologia. 2017;84:263-266.
Craggs MD, Chaffey NJ, Mundy AR. A preliminary report on a new hydraulic sphincter for controlling urinary incontinence. J Med Eng Technol. 1991;15:58-62.
Knight SL, Susser J, Greenwell T, Mundy AR, Craggs MD. A new artificial urinary sphincter with conditional occlusion for stress urinary incontinence: preliminary clinical results. Eur Urol. 2006;50:574-580.
Garcia-Montes F. FlowSecure artificial urinary sphincter for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Arch Esp Urol. 2009;62:845-850.
Cordon BH, Singla N, Singla AK. Artificial urinary sphincters for male stress urinary incontinence: current perspectives. Med Devices: Evid Res. 2016;9:175-183.
Reuvers SH, Groen J, Scheepe JR, Blok BF. Maximum urethral closure pressure increases after successful adjustable continence therapy (ProACT) for stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2016;94:188-192.
Gregori A, Romano AL, Scieri F, Pietrantuono F, Incarbone GP, Salvaggio A, et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided implantation of adjustable continence therapy (ProACT): surgical technique and clinical results after a mean follow-up of 2 years. Eur Urol. 2010;57:430-436.
Malaeb BS, Elliott SP, Lee J, Anderson DW, Timm GW. Novel artificial urinary sphincter in the canine model: the tape mechanical occlusive device. Urology. 2011;77:211-216.
Schrag HJ, Ruthmann O, Doll A, Goldschmidtboing F, Woias P, Hopt UT. Development of a novel, remote-controlled artificial bowel sphincter through microsystems technology. Artif Organs. 2006;30:855-862.
Doll A, Heinrichs M, Goldschmidtboeing F, Schrag HJ, Hopt UT, Woias P. A high performance bidirectional micropump for a novel artificial sphincter system. Sensor Actuat a-Phys. 2006;130:445-453.
Ruthmann O, Richter S, Seifert G, Karcz W, Goldschmidboing F, Lemke T, et al. The first teleautomatic low-voltage prosthesis with multiple therapeutic applications: a new version of the German artificial sphincter system. Artif Organs. 2010;34:635-641.
Muller B, Deyhle H, Mushkolaj S, Wieland M. The challenges in artificial muscle research to treat incontinence. Swiss Med Wkly. 2009;139:591-595.
Valerio M, Jichlinski P, Dahlem R, Tozzi P, Mundy AR. Experimental evaluation of an electromechanical artificial urinary sphincter in an animal model. BJU Int. 2013;112:E337-E343.
Gruneberger AD, Hennig GR, Bullemer F. A magnet system for urethral closure in females. J Biomed Eng. 1984;6:102-106.
Marziale L, Lucarini G, Mazzocchi T, Gruppioni E, Castellano S, Davalli A, et al. Artificial sphincters to manage urinary incontinence: a review. Artif Organs. 2018;42:E215-E233.
Lucarini G, Mazzocchi T, Marziale L, Ricotti L, Menciassi A. Magnetically-controlled artificial urinary sphincters for severe urinary incontinence. IEEE International Conference on Cyborg and Bionic Systems (Cbs) 2017;2017:7-11.
Leicht W, Thueroff J. Therapy of male urinary incontinence. Artificial sphincter versus male slings. Urologe. 2012;51:341-347.
Seo J, Kim YC, Hu JW. Pilot study for investigating the cyclic behavior of slit damper systems with recentering shape memory alloy (SMA) bending bars used for seismic restrainers. Appl Sci-Basel. 2015;5:187-208.
Wang MH, Yu HL. A novel artificial anal sphincter with constant force. Int J Appl Electromagn Mech. 2019;59:1135-1141.
Marziale L, Lucarini G, Mazzocchi T, Ricotti L, Menciassi A. Comparative analysis of occlusion methods for artificial sphincters. Artif Organs. 2020;44:995-1005.
Toniolo I, Mascolini MV, Carniel EL, Fontanella CG. Artificial sphincters: an overview from existing devices to novel technologies. Artif Organs. 2022;47:617-639.