ERP evidence for Slavic and German word stress cue sensitivity in English.
Electroencephalography (EEG)
Mismatch Negativity (MMN)
cue weighting
non-native English
word stress perception
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
25
03
2023
accepted:
31
05
2023
medline:
10
7
2023
pubmed:
10
7
2023
entrez:
10
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Word stress is demanding for non-native learners of English, partly because speakers from different backgrounds weight perceptual cues to stress like pitch, intensity, and duration differently. Slavic learners of English and particularly those with a fixed stress language background like Czech and Polish have been shown to be less sensitive to stress in their native and non-native languages. In contrast, German English learners are rarely discussed in a word stress context. A comparison of these varieties can reveal differences in the foreign language processing of speakers from two language families. We use electroencephalography (EEG) to explore group differences in word stress cue perception between Slavic and German learners of English. Slavic and German advanced English speakers were examined in passive multi-feature oddball experiments, where they were exposed to the word
Identifiants
pubmed: 37425183
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193822
pmc: PMC10328821
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1193822Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Ivanova, Neubert, Schmied and Bendixen.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 29;5:365
pubmed: 24808879
Brain Lang. 2014 Nov;138:61-70
pubmed: 25310025
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 18;10(1):9917
pubmed: 32555256
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Aug;45(4):813-31
pubmed: 25980971
Neuroimage. 2019 Sep;198:181-197
pubmed: 31103785
Neuroreport. 2015 Sep 9;26(13):791-6
pubmed: 26164606
Brain Sci. 2023 Jan 25;13(2):
pubmed: 36831746
Biol Psychol. 2007 Jan;74(1):1-19
pubmed: 16844278
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 11;11:468
pubmed: 32595529
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Jun;238(6):1489-1498
pubmed: 32435921
Psychophysiology. 2001 Jul;38(4):723-7
pubmed: 11446587
Brain Lang. 2021 Jul;218:104964
pubmed: 33964668
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Oct 30;14:556457
pubmed: 33192391
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Sep;73(3):362-8
pubmed: 19482051
Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Dec;121(12):2070-82
pubmed: 20570555
Brain Lang. 2013 Sep;126(3):243-52
pubmed: 23867922
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 23;14:1193822
pubmed: 37425183
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Mar;120(3):453-63
pubmed: 19181570
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(3-4):241-9
pubmed: 17943002
Brain Lang. 2022 Sep;232:105151
pubmed: 35803163
Brain Lang. 2016 Apr-May;155-156:49-57
pubmed: 27140864
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Apr;75(4):255-75
pubmed: 1691075
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Feb;87(2):165-72
pubmed: 23275150
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 21;10:298
pubmed: 30846950
Psychophysiology. 2008 Jan;45(1):60-9
pubmed: 17868262
Psychophysiology. 2017 Jan;54(1):146-157
pubmed: 28000253
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Aug;57(4):1468-79
pubmed: 24686836
Cogn Sci. 2010 Apr;34(3):434-464
pubmed: 21339861
Brain Lang. 2004 Jan;88(1):54-67
pubmed: 14698731
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 16;7:120
pubmed: 26909051
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 01;3:439
pubmed: 23125839
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Nat Neurosci. 2009 May;12(5):535-40
pubmed: 19396166
Front Neurorobot. 2020 Dec 16;14:593732
pubmed: 33390923
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Nov;134(5):3828-43
pubmed: 24180792
Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Aug;118:9-17
pubmed: 28549538
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Oct;100(4 Pt 1):2471-85
pubmed: 8865652
Phonetica. 2022 Sep 08;79(4):397-423
pubmed: 36073964
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;118(12):2544-90
pubmed: 17931964
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Jun;114(6):1133-43
pubmed: 12804682
Neurosci Lett. 2004 Jun 3;363(1):84-8
pubmed: 15158003
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499