Ethnic Rhinoplasty: A Middle East-Centered Patient Satisfaction Survey Using the FACE-Q Questionnaire.
esthetic
ethnic
face-q
plastic
rhinoplasty
satisfaction
surgery
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
accepted:
06
06
2023
medline:
10
7
2023
pubmed:
10
7
2023
entrez:
10
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background Rhinoplasty is a common and complex plastic surgery procedure. The evaluation of surgical success in rhinoplasty is primarily based on patient satisfaction. The purpose of the study is to assess the characteristics of patients who underwent rhinoplasty and their satisfaction using the FACE-Q questionnaire. Methodology This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty, septorhinoplasty, or a revision rhinoplasty from 2010 to 2020 at a single center. Patients were asked to complete the FACE-Q nose score pre and postoperatively. Patients also provided information on their sociodemographic characteristics, smoking status, alcohol consumption, number of rhinoplasty procedures, cause of revision, and respiratory symptoms before rhinoplasty. Results This study included 183 patients who underwent rhinoplasty between 2010 and 2020. The mean (SD) age of patients at surgery was 25.92 (8.69) years. There were 156 female respondents (85.2%) and 27 male respondents (14.8%). FACE-Q nose satisfaction scores increased significantly after surgery with a mean of 67.21 ± 22.3 (p = 0.000). The most common reason for revision surgery was tip dissatisfaction. Conclusions The findings of this study show that ethnic rhinoplasty, although a complex procedure, can lead to aesthetically pleasing outcomes in a complex population such as the Middle Eastern population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37425578
doi: 10.7759/cureus.40048
pmc: PMC10324984
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e40048Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Maassarani et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;10(2):79-83
pubmed: 18347233
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Sep 30;7(9):e2448
pubmed: 31942405
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Dec;130(6):843e-850e
pubmed: 23190836
Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Jan;36(1):NP1-5
pubmed: 26063834
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Dec 18;6(12):e1984
pubmed: 30656100
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;36(2):248-53
pubmed: 21858595
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;24(1):119-30
pubmed: 22284401
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Sep 15;112(4):1071-85; quiz 1086
pubmed: 12973227
Cureus. 2020 Nov 29;12(11):e11777
pubmed: 33409024
Rhinology. 2006 Sep;44(3):201-4
pubmed: 17020068
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Feb;135(2):375-386
pubmed: 25626785
Ann Plast Surg. 1986 Dec;17(6):513-20
pubmed: 3827121
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Nov - Dec;84(6):736-743
pubmed: 29074124
Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Sep;35(7):784-93
pubmed: 26063837
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 May;135(5):830e-837e
pubmed: 25919265
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2002 Nov;10(4):381-96
pubmed: 15062299
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Jan-Feb;18(1):27-35
pubmed: 26605889
Rhinology. 1995 Dec;33(4):224-8
pubmed: 8919216
Cureus. 2019 Jul 30;11(7):e5283
pubmed: 31576273
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Mar;25(2):377-9
pubmed: 24531253
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010 Sep-Oct;12(5):291-7
pubmed: 20855769
Am J Rhinol. 1997 Jan-Feb;11(1):73-5
pubmed: 9065351
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;21(1):97-101
pubmed: 28050215