A retrospective study of the efficacy of combined EGFR‑TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy vs. EGFR‑TKI monotherapy for PD‑L1‑positive EGFR‑mutant non‑small cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group 2202.
cytotoxic agent
prognosis
survival
tyrosine kinase inhibitor
vascular endothelial growth factor
Journal
Oncology letters
ISSN: 1792-1082
Titre abrégé: Oncol Lett
Pays: Greece
ID NLM: 101531236
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
28
03
2023
accepted:
13
06
2023
medline:
10
7
2023
pubmed:
10
7
2023
entrez:
10
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The present multicenter study was performed to compare the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy with that of combined EGFR-TKI plus vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF) inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data from patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC were collected from 12 institutes. Survival in patients treated with first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib (third-generation EGFR-TKI), and combined EGFR-TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy was analyzed by multiple regression analysis with adjustments for sex, performance status, EGFR mutation status, PD-L1 expression level, and the presence or absence of brain metastasis using a Cox proportional hazards model. Data from a total of 263 patients were analyzed, including 111 (42.2%) patients who had received monotherapy with a first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI, 132 (50.2%) patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy, and 20 (7.6%) patients who had received combined EGFR-TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy (hereafter referred to as combined therapy). Multiple regression analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for progression-free survival was 0.73 (0.54-1.00) in the patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy and 0.47 (0.25-0.90) in patients who had received combined therapy. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.98 (0.65-1.48) in the patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy and 0.52 (0.21-1.31) in patients who had received combined therapy. In conclusion, combined therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of progression compared with first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy, and therefore, may be promising for the treatment of patients of NSCLC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37427337
doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.13920
pii: OL-26-2-13920
pmc: PMC10326654
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
334Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Inomata et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests.
Références
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 13;12(1):9753
pubmed: 35697720
Sci Transl Med. 2017 Nov 15;9(416):
pubmed: 29141884
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Dec;159:144-153
pubmed: 34749119
J Clin Invest. 2022 Jul 1;132(13):
pubmed: 35579943
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39
pubmed: 26412456
Sci Transl Med. 2023 May 3;15(694):eade5855
pubmed: 37134151
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):625-635
pubmed: 30975627
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):629-640
pubmed: 27959700
Cancer Biol Ther. 2016;17(3):237-45
pubmed: 26785607
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Dec;74(6):1297-305
pubmed: 25344762
BMJ. 2019 Oct 7;367:l5460
pubmed: 31591158
Onco Targets Ther. 2020 Aug 20;13:8273-8285
pubmed: 32903896
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Aug;10(8):3582-3593
pubmed: 34584858
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 16;10(1):259
pubmed: 30651547
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Apr;8(7):518
pubmed: 32395562
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jan;124:110-122
pubmed: 31760310
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 1;12(19):5764-9
pubmed: 17020982
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Nov 25;10(12):
pubmed: 33255696
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24;362(25):2380-8
pubmed: 20573926
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):113-125
pubmed: 29151359
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 1;26(34):5589-95
pubmed: 18794545
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016 May 20;474(1):154-160
pubmed: 27105908
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 2;382(1):41-50
pubmed: 31751012
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1655-1669
pubmed: 31591063
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Feb;11(2):121-8
pubmed: 20022809
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Aug 27;100(34):e27038
pubmed: 34449486
Anticancer Res. 2022 May;42(5):2583-2590
pubmed: 35489768
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2022 May 3;2(3):324-329
pubmed: 35530643
ESMO Open. 2021 Jun;6(3):100115
pubmed: 33984681
Mol Cancer. 2019 Feb 11;18(1):24
pubmed: 30744655
Genes Cancer. 2017 Mar;8(3-4):497-504
pubmed: 28680534
Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Mar 22;12(4):252-64
pubmed: 22437870
Cancer Sci. 2023 Feb;114(2):606-618
pubmed: 36169649
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 10;38(2):115-123
pubmed: 31682542
J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Nov;16(11):1788-1792
pubmed: 34716002
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 May 8;19(1):145
pubmed: 33964931
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;40(31):3587-3592
pubmed: 35960896
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):141-51
pubmed: 25589191