Alcohol-mediated renal denervation in patients with hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications.
Journal
EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1969-6213
Titre abrégé: EuroIntervention
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101251040
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Sep 2023
18 Sep 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
18
09
2024
medline:
19
9
2023
pubmed:
10
7
2023
entrez:
10
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ultrasound and radiofrequency renal denervation (RDN) have been shown to safely lower blood pressure (BP) in hypertension. The TARGET BP OFF-MED trial investigated the efficacy and safety of alcohol-mediated renal denervation (RDN) in the absence of antihypertensive medications. This randomised, blinded, sham-controlled trial was conducted in 25 centres in Europe and the USA. Patients with a 24-hour systolic BP of 135-170 mmHg, an office systolic BP 140-180 mmHg and diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg on 0-2 antihypertensive medications were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in mean 24-hour systolic BP at 8 weeks. Safety endpoints included major adverse events up to 30 days. A total of 106 patients were randomised; the baseline mean office BP following medication washout was 159.4/100.4±10.9/7.0 mmHg (RDN) and 160.1/98.3±11.0/6.1 mmHg (sham), respectively. At 8 weeks post-procedure, the mean (±standard deviation) 24-hour systolic BP change was â2.9±7.4 mmHg (p=0.009) versus â1.4±8.6 mmHg (p=0.25) in the RDN and sham groups, respectively (mean between-group difference: 1.5 mmHg; p=0.27). There were no differences in safety events between groups. After 12 months of blinded follow-up, with medication escalation, patients achieved similar office systolic BP (RDN: 147.9±18.5 mmHg; sham: 147.8±15.1 mmHg; p=0.68) with a significantly lower medication burden in the RDN group (mean daily defined dose: 1.5±1.5 vs 2.3±1.7; p=0.017). In this trial, alcohol-mediated RDN was delivered safely but was not associated with significant BP differences between groups. Medication burden was lower in the RDN group up to 12 months.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Ultrasound and radiofrequency renal denervation (RDN) have been shown to safely lower blood pressure (BP) in hypertension.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
The TARGET BP OFF-MED trial investigated the efficacy and safety of alcohol-mediated renal denervation (RDN) in the absence of antihypertensive medications.
METHODS
METHODS
This randomised, blinded, sham-controlled trial was conducted in 25 centres in Europe and the USA. Patients with a 24-hour systolic BP of 135-170 mmHg, an office systolic BP 140-180 mmHg and diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg on 0-2 antihypertensive medications were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in mean 24-hour systolic BP at 8 weeks. Safety endpoints included major adverse events up to 30 days.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 106 patients were randomised; the baseline mean office BP following medication washout was 159.4/100.4±10.9/7.0 mmHg (RDN) and 160.1/98.3±11.0/6.1 mmHg (sham), respectively. At 8 weeks post-procedure, the mean (±standard deviation) 24-hour systolic BP change was â2.9±7.4 mmHg (p=0.009) versus â1.4±8.6 mmHg (p=0.25) in the RDN and sham groups, respectively (mean between-group difference: 1.5 mmHg; p=0.27). There were no differences in safety events between groups. After 12 months of blinded follow-up, with medication escalation, patients achieved similar office systolic BP (RDN: 147.9±18.5 mmHg; sham: 147.8±15.1 mmHg; p=0.68) with a significantly lower medication burden in the RDN group (mean daily defined dose: 1.5±1.5 vs 2.3±1.7; p=0.017).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In this trial, alcohol-mediated RDN was delivered safely but was not associated with significant BP differences between groups. Medication burden was lower in the RDN group up to 12 months.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37427416
pii: EIJ-D-23-00088
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00088
pmc: PMC10493775
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antihypertensive Agents
0
Ethanol
3K9958V90M
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
602-611Références
Lancet. 2020 May 2;395(10234):1444-1451
pubmed: 32234534
Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):991-1001
pubmed: 34461042
Stat Med. 1996 Jul 15;15(13):1421-34
pubmed: 8841652
Circ Res. 2021 Apr 2;128(7):1080-1099
pubmed: 33793330
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep;14(9):e010075
pubmed: 34470501
Am Heart J. 2021 Sep;239:90-99
pubmed: 34052211
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104
pubmed: 30165516
BMJ. 2012 Jul 09;345:e3953
pubmed: 22777025
J Hypertens. 2013 Apr;31(4):766-74
pubmed: 23337469
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 28;9(6):589-98
pubmed: 27013159
Lancet. 2022 Apr 9;399(10333):1401-1410
pubmed: 35390320
Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):957-980
pubmed: 34450083
Lancet. 2020 Dec 12;396(10266):1895-1904
pubmed: 33197395
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec 28;13(24):2922-2933
pubmed: 33357531
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2335-2345
pubmed: 29803590
Circ Res. 2019 Mar 29;124(7):1124-1140
pubmed: 30920917
Heart. 2014 Jun;100(11):855-61
pubmed: 24694797
J Hypertens. 2020 Apr;38(4):579-587
pubmed: 31834123
Lancet. 2017 Nov 11;390(10108):2160-2170
pubmed: 28859944
Angiology. 2022 Aug;73(7):682-687
pubmed: 34889662
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Jun;16(4):221-7
pubmed: 25979565
Hypertension. 2003 Dec;42(6):1206-52
pubmed: 14656957
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 24;13(4):471-484
pubmed: 32081241
Am Heart J. 2022 May;247:15-23
pubmed: 34902314
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):235-237
pubmed: 34865499
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 Oct;17(10):614-628
pubmed: 32286512
Anal Chim Acta. 2015 Sep 3;891:221-33
pubmed: 26388381
Lancet. 2021 Jun 26;397(10293):2476-2486
pubmed: 34010611
Eur Heart J. 2015 Sep 1;36(33):2219-27
pubmed: 25990344
EuroIntervention. 2013 May 20;9(1):140-7
pubmed: 23685302
J Hum Hypertens. 2022 Jul;36(7):629-639
pubmed: 34031548