The mosaic embryo: what it means for the doctor and the patient.


Journal

Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 2724-6450
Titre abrégé: Minerva Obstet Gynecol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101777346

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Jan 2023
Historique:
medline: 10 7 2023
pubmed: 10 7 2023
entrez: 10 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Mosaic embryos are embryos that on preimplantation genetic analysis are found to be composed of euploid and aneuploid cells. Although most of these embryos do not implant when transferred into the uterus following IVF treatment, some may implant and are capable of giving rise to babies. There is currently an increasing number of reports of live births following the transfer of mosaic embryos. Compared to euploid, mosaic embryos have lower implantation rates and higher rates of miscarriage, and occasionally aneuploid component persists. However, their outcome is better than that obtained after the transfer of embryos consisting entirely of aneuploid cells. After implantation, the ability to develop into a full-term pregnancy is influenced by the amount and type of chromosomal mosaicism present in a mosaic embryo. Nowadays many experts in the reproductive field consider mosaic transfers as an option when no euploid embryos are available. Genetic counseling is an important part of educating patients about the likelihood of having a pregnancy with healthy baby but also on the risk that mosaicism could persist and result in liveborn with chromosomal abnormality. Each situation needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis and counseled accordingly. So far, the transfers of 2155 mosaic embryos have been documented and 440 live births resulting in healthy babies have been reported. In addition, in the literature to date, there are 6 cases in which embryonic mosaicism persisted. In conclusion, the available data indicate that mosaic embryos have the potential to implant and develop into healthy babies, albeit with lower success rates than euploids. Further clinical outcomes should be collected to better establish a refined ranking of embryos to transfer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37427860
pii: S2724-606X.23.05281-8
doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05281-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Ermanno Greco (E)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UniCamillus International University, Rome, Italy.
Villa Mafalda, Centre For Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.

Pier F Greco (PF)

Villa Mafalda, Centre For Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.

Ilaria Listorti (I)

Villa Mafalda, Centre For Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.

Carlo Ronsini (C)

Department of Women and Children, Luigi Vanvitelli University of Campania, Naples, Italy.
Department of General and Specialist Surgery, Luigi Vanvitelli University of Campania, Naples, Italy.

Francesco Cucinelli (F)

Reproductive Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Anil Biricik (A)

Eurofins Genoma Group S.r.l., Rome, Italy.

Manuel Viotti (M)

Kindlabs, Kindbody, New York, NY, USA.
Zouves Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, Foster City, CA, USA.

Noemi Meschino (N)

La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Francesca Spinella (F)

Eurofins Genoma Group S.r.l., Rome, Italy - spinella@laboratoriogenoma.it.

Classifications MeSH