Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Ageing.
Affective
Aging
Alzheimer’s Disease
Cerebellum
Cognitive
Motor
Journal
Cerebellum (London, England)
ISSN: 1473-4230
Titre abrégé: Cerebellum
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089443
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Apr 2024
Historique:
accepted:
08
06
2023
pmc-release:
10
01
2025
pubmed:
10
7
2023
medline:
10
7
2023
entrez:
10
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Given the key roles of the cerebellum in motor, cognitive, and affective operations and given the decline of brain functions with aging, cerebellar circuitry is attracting the attention of the scientific community. The cerebellum plays a key role in timing aspects of both motor and cognitive operations, including for complex tasks such as spatial navigation. Anatomically, the cerebellum is connected with the basal ganglia via disynaptic loops, and it receives inputs from nearly every region in the cerebral cortex. The current leading hypothesis is that the cerebellum builds internal models and facilitates automatic behaviors through multiple interactions with the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia and spinal cord. The cerebellum undergoes structural and functional changes with aging, being involved in mobility frailty and related cognitive impairment as observed in the physio-cognitive decline syndrome (PCDS) affecting older, functionally-preserved adults who show slowness and/or weakness. Reductions in cerebellar volume accompany aging and are at least correlated with cognitive decline. There is a strongly negative correlation between cerebellar volume and age in cross-sectional studies, often mirrored by a reduced performance in motor tasks. Still, predictive motor timing scores remain stable over various age groups despite marked cerebellar atrophy. The cerebello-frontal network could play a significant role in processing speed and impaired cerebellar function due to aging might be compensated by increasing frontal activity to optimize processing speed in the elderly. For cognitive operations, decreased functional connectivity of the default mode network (DMN) is correlated with lower performances. Neuroimaging studies highlight that the cerebellum might be involved in the cognitive decline occurring in Alzheimer's disease (AD), independently of contributions of the cerebral cortex. Grey matter volume loss in AD is distinct from that seen in normal aging, occurring initially in cerebellar posterior lobe regions, and is associated with neuronal, synaptic and beta-amyloid neuropathology. Regarding depression, structural imaging studies have identified a relationship between depressive symptoms and cerebellar gray matter volume. In particular, major depressive disorder (MDD) and higher depressive symptom burden are associated with smaller gray matter volumes in the total cerebellum as well as the posterior cerebellum, vermis, and posterior Crus I. From the genetic/epigenetic standpoint, prominent DNA methylation changes in the cerebellum with aging are both in the form of hypo- and hyper-methylation, and the presumably increased/decreased expression of certain genes might impact on motor coordination. Training influences motor skills and lifelong practice might contribute to structural maintenance of the cerebellum in old age, reducing loss of grey matter volume and therefore contributing to the maintenance of cerebellar reserve. Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation techniques are increasingly being applied to enhance cerebellar functions related to motor, cognitive, and affective operations. They might enhance cerebellar reserve in the elderly. In conclusion, macroscopic and microscopic changes occur in the cerebellum during the lifespan, with changes in structural and functional connectivity with both the cerebral cortex and basal ganglia. With the aging of the population and the impact of aging on quality of life, the panel of experts considers that there is a huge need to clarify how the effects of aging on the cerebellar circuitry modify specific motor, cognitive, and affective operations both in normal subjects and in brain disorders such as AD or MDD, with the goal of preventing symptoms or improving the motor, cognitive, and affective symptoms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37428408
doi: 10.1007/s12311-023-01577-7
pii: 10.1007/s12311-023-01577-7
pmc: PMC10776824
mid: NIHMS1923663
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
802-832Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R21 AG077307
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : T32 AG052354
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U19 AG073172
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG064010
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U19 AG065169
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Manto M, Gruol DL, Schmahmann JD, Koibuchi N, Sillitoe RV. Handbook of Cerebellum and Cerebellar Disorders. Springer; 2022.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-23810-0
Van Overwalle F, Manto M, Cattaneo Z, Clausi S, Ferrari C, Gabrieli JDE, Guell X, Heleven E, Lupo M, Ma Q, Michelutti M, Olivito G, Pu M, Rice LC, Schmahmann JD, Siciliano L, Sokolov AA, Stoodley CJ, van Dun K, et al. Consensus Paper: cerebellum and social cognition. Cerebellum. 2020;19(6):833–68.
pubmed: 32632709
pmcid: 7588399
doi: 10.1007/s12311-020-01155-1
Bareš M, Apps R, Avanzino L, Breska A, D’Angelo E, Filip P, Gerwig M, Ivry RB, Lawrenson CL, Louis ED, Lusk NA, Manto M, Meck WH, Mitoma H, Petter EA. Consensus paper: decoding the contributions of the cerebellum as a time machine. from neurons to clinical applications. Cerebellum. 2019;18(2):266–86.
pubmed: 30259343
doi: 10.1007/s12311-018-0979-5
Bostan AC, Strick PL. The basal ganglia and the cerebellum: nodes in an integrated network. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(6):338–50.
pubmed: 29643480
pmcid: 6503669
doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0002-7
D’Angelo E. Physiology of the cerebellum. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;154:85–108.
pubmed: 29903454
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63956-1.00006-0
GBD 2017 US Neurological Disorders Collaborators, Feigin VL, Vos T, Alahdab F, AML A, Bärnighausen TW, Beghi E, Beheshti M, Chavan PP, Criqui MH, Desai R, Dhamminda Dharmaratne S, Dorsey ER, Wilder Eagan A, Elgendy IY, Filip I, Giampaoli S, Giussani G, Hafezi-Nejad N, et al. Burden of neurological disorders across the US from 1990-2017: a global burden of disease study. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(2):165–76.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4152
Hou Y, Dan X, Babbar M, Wei Y, Hasselbalch SG, Croteau DL, Bohr VA. Ageing as a risk factor for neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(10):565–81.
pubmed: 31501588
doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0244-7
Jacobs HIL, Hopkins DA, Mayrhofer HC, Bruner E, van Leeuwen FW, Raaijmakers W, Schmahmann JD. The cerebellum in Alzheimer’s disease: evaluating its role in cognitive decline. Brain. 2018;141(1):37–47.
pubmed: 29053771
doi: 10.1093/brain/awx194
Buhusi CV, Meck WH. What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(10):755–65.
pubmed: 16163383
doi: 10.1038/nrn1764
Wencil EB, Coslett HB, Aguirre GK, Chatterjee A. Carving the clock at its component joints: neural bases for interval timing. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104(1):160–8.
pubmed: 20457861
pmcid: 2904232
doi: 10.1152/jn.00029.2009
Buonomano DV, Maass W. State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(2):113–25.
pubmed: 19145235
doi: 10.1038/nrn2558
Filip P, Lošák J, Kašpárek T, Vaníček J, Bareš M. Neural network of predictive motor timing in the context of gender differences. Neural Plast. 2016;2016
Filip P, Gallea C, Lehéricy S, Bertasi E, Popa T, Mareček R, et al. Disruption in cerebellar and basal ganglia networks during a visuospatial task in cervical dystonia. Mov Disord. 2017;32(5):757–68.
pubmed: 28186664
doi: 10.1002/mds.26930
Bares M, Husarova I, Lungu OV. Essential tremor, the cerebellum, and motor timing: towards integrating them into one complex entity. Tremor Other Hyperkinetic Mov. 2012;2:1–9.
Naccarato M, Calautti C, Jones PS, Day DJ, Carpenter TA, Baron JC. Does healthy aging effect the hemispheric activation balance during paced index-to-thumb opposition task? An fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2006;32(3):1250–6.
pubmed: 16806984
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.003
Mattay VS, Fera F, Tessitore A, Hariri AR, Das S, Callicott JH, et al. Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in human motor function. Neurology. 2002;58(4):630.
pubmed: 11865144
doi: 10.1212/WNL.58.4.630
Park DC, Reuter-Lorenz P. The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Ann Rev Psychol. 2009;60:173–96.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656
Jernigan TL, Archibald SL, Fennema-Notestine C, Gamst AC, Stout JC, Bonner J, et al. Effects of age on tissues and regions of the cerebrum and cerebellum. Neurobiol Aging. 2001;22(4):581–94.
pubmed: 11445259
doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00217-2
Bernard J, Nguyen AD, Hausman HK, Maldonado T, Ballard HK, Eakin SM, et al. Shaky scaffolding: age differences in cerebellar activation revealed through activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. bioRxiv. 2019:716530.
Horvath S, Mah V, Lu AT, Woo JS, Choi OW, Jasinska AJ, et al. The cerebellum ages slowly according to the epigenetic clock. Aging (Albany NY). 2015;7(5):294.
pubmed: 26000617
pmcid: 4468311
doi: 10.18632/aging.100742
Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):3156.
doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115
Mecocci P, MacGarvey U, Kaufman AE, Koontz D, Shoffner JM, Wallace DC, et al. Oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA shows marked age-dependent increases in human brain. Ann Neurol. 1993;34(4):609–16.
pubmed: 8215249
doi: 10.1002/ana.410340416
Filip P, Gallea C, Lehéricy S, Lungu O, Bareš M. Neural scaffolding as the foundation for stable performance of aging cerebellum. Cerebellum. 2019;18(3):500–10.
pubmed: 30827012
doi: 10.1007/s12311-019-01015-7
Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage. 2009;44(2):489–501.
pubmed: 18835452
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.039
Filip P, Lungu OV, Bareš M. Dystonia and the cerebellum: a new field of interest in movement disorders? Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(7):1269–76.
pubmed: 23422326
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.01.003
Marcián V, Filip P, Bareš M, Brázdil M. Cerebellar dysfunction and ataxia in patients with epilepsy: coincidence, consequence, or cause? Tremor Other Hyperkinetic Mov. 2016;6:376.
doi: 10.5334/tohm.331
Koziol LF, Budding D, Andreasen N, D’Arrigo S, Bulgheroni S, Imamizu H, Yamazaki T. Consensus Paper: the cerebellum’s role in movement and cognition. Cerebellum. 2014;13:151–77.
pubmed: 23996631
pmcid: 4089997
doi: 10.1007/s12311-013-0511-x
Kansal K, Yang Z, Fishman AM, Sair HI, Ying SH, Jedynak BM, Onyike CU. Structural cerebellar correlates of cognitive and motor dysfunctions in cerebellar degeneration. Brain. 2016:140. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww327 .
Langner R, Eickhoff SB. Sustaining attention to simple tasks: a meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. Psychol Bull. 2013;139(4):870–900.
pubmed: 23163491
doi: 10.1037/a0030694
Keren‐Happuch E, Chen SH, Ho MH, Desmond JE. A meta-analysis of cerebellar contributions to higher cognition from PET and fMRI studies. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35(2):593–615.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.22194
Roberts RD, StankovL. Individual differences in speed of mental processing and human cognitive abilities: troward a taxonomic model. Learning Individ Diff. 1999:11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(00)80007-2 .
Habeck C, Gazes Y, Razlighi Q, Steffener J, Brickman A, Barulli D, Stern Y. The reference ability neural network study: life-time stability of reference-ability neural networks derived from task maps of young adults. Neuroimage. 2016:125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.077 .
Habas C. Functional connectivity of the cognitive cerebellum. Front Syst Neurosci. 2021:15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.642225 .
Forn C, Ripollés P, Cruz-Gómez AJ, Belenguer A, González-Torre JA, Ávila C. Task-load manipulation in the symbol digit modalities test: an alternative measure of information processing speed. Brain Cognition. 2013:82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.04.003 .
Silva PHR, Spedo CT, Baldassarini CR, Benini CD, Ferreira DA, Barreira AA, Leoni RF. Brain functional and effective connectivity underlying the information processing speed assessed by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Neuroimage. 2019:184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.080 .
Wong CHY, Liu J, Lee TMC, Tao J, Wong AWK, Chau BKH, Chan CCH. Fronto-cerebellar connectivity mediating cognitive processing speed. Neuroimage. 2021:226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117556 .
Gao M, CHY W, Huang H, Shao R, Huang R, CCH C, TMC L. Connectome-based models can predict processing speed in older adults. Neuroimage. 2020;223 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117290 .
Wong CHY, Liu J, Tao J, Chen LD, Yuan HL, Wong MNK, Xu YW, Lee TMC, Chan CCH. Causal influences of salience/cerebellar networks on dorsal attention network subserved age-related cognitive slowing. GeroScience. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-022-00686-1 .
Bernard JA, Seidler RD. Moving forward: age effects on the cerebellum underlie cognitive and motor declines. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014:42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.011 .
Eckert MA. Slowing down: age-related neurobiological predictors of processing speed. Front Neurosci. 2011:5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00025 .
Ramnani N. Chapter 10 Automatic and controlled processing in the corticocerebellar system. Progr Brain Res. 2014;210 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63356-9.00010-8 .
Strick PL, Dum RP, Fiez JA. Cerebellum and nonmotor function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:413–34.
pubmed: 19555291
doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125606
Pelzer EA, Hintzen A, Goldau M, von Cramon DY, Timmermann L, Tittgemeyer M. Cerebellar networks with basal ganglia: feasibility for tracking cerebello-pallidal and subthalamo-cerebellar projections in the human brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2013;38:3106–14.
pubmed: 23879686
doi: 10.1111/ejn.12314
Bernard JA, Peltier SJ, Wiggins JL, Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Fling BW, Kwak Y, Jonides J, Monk CS, Seidler RD. Disrupted cortico-cerebellar connectivity in older adults. Neuroimage. 2013;83:103–19.
pubmed: 23792980
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.042
Di Martino A, Scheres A, Margulies DS, Kelly AMC, Uddin LQ, Shehzad Z, Biswal B, Walters JR, Castellanos FX, Milham MP. Functional connectivity of human striatum: a resting state fMRI study. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18:2735–47.
pubmed: 18400794
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn041
Hausman HK, Jackson TB, Goen JRM, Bernard JA. From synchrony to asynchrony: cerebellar-basal ganglia functional circuits in young and older adults. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30:718–29.
pubmed: 31219563
Bernard JA, Seidler RD, Hassevoort KM, Benson BL, Welsh RC, Wiggins JL, Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Monk CS, Jonides J, Peltier SJ. Resting state cortico-cerebellar functional connectivity networks: a comparison of anatomical and self-organizing map approaches. Front Neuroanat. 2012;10(6):31.
Jackson TB, Bernard JA. Cerebello-basal ganglia networks and cortical network global efficiency. Cerebellum. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-022-01418-z .
Klostermann EC, Braskie MN, Landau SM, O’Neil JP, Jagust WJ. Dopamine and frontostriatal networks in cognitive aging. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33:623.e15–24.
pubmed: 21511369
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.03.002
Bernard JA, Ballard HK, Jackson TB. Cerebellar dentate connectivity across adulthood: a large-scale resting state functional connectivity investigation. Cereb Cortex Commun. 2021;2:tgab050.
pubmed: 34527949
pmcid: 8436571
doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgab050
Carp J, Park J, Polk TA, Park DC. Age differences in neural distinctiveness revealed by multi-voxel pattern analysis. Neuroimage. 2011;56:736–43.
pubmed: 20451629
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.267
Festini SB, Bernard JA, Kwak Y, Peltier S, Bohnen NI, Müller MLTM, Dayalu P, Seidler RD. Altered cerebellar connectivity in parkinson’s patients ON and OFF L-DOPA medication. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00214 .
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00214
pubmed: 25954184
pmcid: 4405615
Kelly C, De Zubicaray G, Di Martino A, Copland DA, Reiss PT, Klein DF, Castellanos FX, Milham MP, McMahon K. L-dopa modulates functional connectivity in striatal cognitive and motor networks: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Neurosci. 2009;29:7364–78.
pubmed: 19494158
pmcid: 2928147
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0810-09.2009
Fearnley JM, Lees AJ. Ageing and Parkinson’s disease : substantia nigra regional selectivity. Brain. 1991;114:2283–301.
pubmed: 1933245
doi: 10.1093/brain/114.5.2283
Hogan MJ. The cerebellum in thought and action: a fronto-cerebellar aging hypothesis. New Ideas Psychol. 2004;22:97–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2004.09.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2004.09.002
Hogan MJ, Staff RT, Bunting BD, et al. Cerebellar brain volume accounts for variance in cognitive performance in older adults. Cortex. 2011;47:441–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.01.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.01.001
pubmed: 20167312
Schmahmann JD. Disorders of the cerebellum: ataxia, dysmetria of thought, and the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004;16:367–78. https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.16.3.367 .
doi: 10.1176/jnp.16.3.367
pubmed: 15377747
Han S, An Y, Carass A, Prince JL, Resnick SM. Longitudinal analysis of regional cerebellum volumes during normal aging. Neuroimage. 2020;220:117062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117062 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117062
pubmed: 32592850
Nadkarni NK, Nunley KA, Aizenstein H, et al. Association between cerebellar gray matter volumes, gait speed, and information-processing ability in older adults enrolled in the Health ABC study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69:996–1003. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glt151 .
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glt151
pubmed: 24170673
Kim HJ, Cheong EN, Jo S, et al. The cerebellum could serve as a potential imaging biomarker of dementia conversion in patients with amyloid-negative amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28:1520–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14770 .
doi: 10.1111/ene.14770
pubmed: 33559375
Andersen K, Andersen BB, Pakkenberg B. Stereological quantification of the cerebellum in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(197):e111–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.06.013 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.06.013
Liang KJ, Carlson ES. Resistance, vulnerability and resilience: a review of the cognitive cerebellum in aging and neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2020;170:106981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2019.01.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.01.004
pubmed: 30630042
Locke TM, Soden ME, Miller SM, et al. Dopamine D1 receptor-positive neurons in the lateral nucleus of the cerebellum contribute to cognitive behavior. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;84:401–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.01.019 .
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.01.019
pubmed: 29478701
pmcid: 6072628
Bernard JA, Leopold DR, Calhoun VD, Mittal VA. Regional cerebellar volume and cognitive function from adolescence to late middle age. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36:1102–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22690 .
doi: 10.1002/hbm.22690
pubmed: 25395058
Romero JE, Coupe P, Lanuza E, et al. Toward a unified analysis of cerebellum maturation and aging across the entire lifespan: a MRI analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42:1287–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25293 .
doi: 10.1002/hbm.25293
pubmed: 33385303
pmcid: 7927303
Diedrichsen J, Maderwald S, Küper M, et al. Imaging the deep cerebellar nuclei: a probabilistic atlas and normalization procedure. Neuroimage. 2011;54:1786–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.035 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.035
pubmed: 20965257
Gilissen EP, Leroy K, Yilmaz Z, et al. A neuronal aging pattern unique to humans and common chimpanzees. Brain Struct Funct. 2016;221:647–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0931-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0931-5
pubmed: 25381006
Chen J, Cohen ML, Lerner AJ, Yang Y, Herrup K. DNA damage and cell cycle events implicate cerebellar dentate nucleus neurons as targets of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2010;5:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1326-5-60 .
doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-5-60
pubmed: 21172027
pmcid: 3018387
Bernard JA. Don’t forget the little brain: a framework for incorporating the cerebellum into the understanding of cognitive aging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;137:104639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104639 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104639
pubmed: 35346747
pmcid: 9119942
Yao Q, Tang F, Wang Y, et al. Effect of cerebellum stimulation on cognitive recovery in patients with Alzheimer disease: a randomized clinical trial. Brain Stimul. 2022;15:910–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.06.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.06.004
pubmed: 35700915
Arleo A, Rondi-Reig L. Multimodal sensory integration and concurrent navigation strategies for spatial cognition in real and artificial organisms. J Integr Neurosci. 2007;6:327–66. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219635207001593 .
doi: 10.1142/s0219635207001593
pubmed: 17933016
Colombo D, Serino S, Tuena C, Pedroli E, Dakanalis A, Cipresso P, et al. Egocentric and allocentric spatial reference frames in aging: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;80:605–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.012 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.012
pubmed: 28760627
Lester AW, Moffat SD, Wiener JM, Barnes CA, Wolbers T. The aging navigational system. Neuron. 2017;95:1019–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.037 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.037
pubmed: 28858613
pmcid: 5659315
Ramanoël S, Durteste M, Bécu M, Habas C, Arleo A. Differential brain activity in regions linked to visuospatial processing during landmark-based navigation in young and healthy older adults. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:552111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.552111 .
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.552111
pubmed: 33240060
pmcid: 7668216
Igloi K, Doeller CF, Paradis A-L, Benchenane K, Berthoz A, Burgess N, et al. Interaction between hippocampus and cerebellum Crus I in sequence-based but not place-based navigation. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25:4146–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu132 .
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu132
pubmed: 24947462
Hauser MFA, Heba S, Schmidt-Wilcke T, Tegenthoff M, Manahan-Vaughan D. Cerebellar-hippocampal processing in passive perception of visuospatial change: An ego- and allocentric axis? Hum Brain Mapp. 2020;41:1153–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24865 .
doi: 10.1002/hbm.24865
pubmed: 31729790
Rondi-Reig L, Paradis A-L, Fallahnezhad M. A liaison brought to light: cerebellum-hippocampus, partners for spatial cognition. Cerebellum. 2022;21:826–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-022-01422-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s12311-022-01422-3
pubmed: 35752720
Yuan P, Daugherty AM, Raz N. Turning bias in virtual spatial navigation: age-related differences and neuroanatomical correlates. Biol Psychol. 2014;96:8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.10.009 .
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.10.009
pubmed: 24192272
Daugherty AM, Raz N. A virtual water maze revisited: two-year changes in navigation performance and their neural correlates in healthy adults. Neuroimage. 2017;146:492–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.044 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.044
pubmed: 27659539
Moffat SD, Elkins W, Resnick SM. Age differences in the neural systems supporting human allocentric spatial navigation. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27:965–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.05.011 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.05.011
pubmed: 15982787
Antonova E, Parslow D, Brammer M, Dawson GR, Jackson SHD, Morris RG. Age-related neural activity during allocentric spatial memory. Memory. 2009;17(2):125–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802077348 .
doi: 10.1080/09658210802077348
pubmed: 18608980
Ramanoël S, Durteste M, Perot V, Habas C, Arleo A. An appraisal of the role of the neocerebellum for spatial navigation in healthy aging. Cerebellum. 2023;22(2):235–9.
pubmed: 35257295
doi: 10.1007/s12311-022-01389-1
Mirino P, Pecchinenda A, Boccia M, Capirchio A, D’Antonio F, Guariglia C. Cerebellum-cortical interaction in spatial navigation and its alteration in dementias. Brain Sci. 2022:12. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/5/523
Gellersen HM, Guell X, Sami S. Differential vulnerability of the cerebellum in healthy ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;30:102605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102605 .
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102605
pubmed: 33735787
pmcid: 7974323
World Health Organization. Decade of healthy ageing: baseline report. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2021. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/mca-documents/decade-of-healthy-ageing-baseline-report_06012021.pdf . Accessed 25 June 2021.
Panza F, Lozupone M, Solfrizzi V, Sardone R, Dibello V, Di Lena L, D’Urso F, Stallone R, Petruzzi M, Giannelli G, Quaranta N, Bellomo A, Greco A, Daniele A, Seripa D, Logroscino G. Different cognitive frailty models and health- and cognitive-related outcomes in older age: from epidemiology to prevention. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62:993–1012. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170963 .
doi: 10.3233/JAD-170963
pubmed: 29562543
pmcid: 5870024
Robertson DA, Savva GM, Kenny RA. Frailty and cognitive impairment—a review of the evidence and causal mechanisms. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12:840–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2013.06.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2013.06.004
pubmed: 23831959
Zheng L, Li G, Gao D, Wang S, Meng X, Wang C, Yuan H, Chen L. Cognitive frailty as a predictor of dementia among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;87:103997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2019.103997 .
doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2019.103997
pubmed: 31846833
Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Chou MY, Iijima K, Jang HC, Kang L, Kim M, Kim S, Kojima T, Kuzuya M, Lee JSW, Lee SY, Lee WJ, Lee Y, Liang CK, Lim JY, Lim WS, et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21:300–307.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012
pubmed: 32033882
Chung CP, Lee WJ, Peng LN, Shimada H, Tsai TF, Lin CP, Arai H, Chen LK. Physio-cognitive decline syndrome as the phenotype and treatment target of unhealthy aging. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(10):1179–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-021-1693-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1693-4
pubmed: 34866145
Shimada H, Doi T, Lee S, Makizako H, Chen LK, Arai H. Cognitive frailty predicts incident dementia among community-dwelling older people. J Clin Med. 2018;7:250. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7090250 .
doi: 10.3390/jcm7090250
pubmed: 30200236
pmcid: 6162851
Tsutsumimoto K, Doi T, Nakakubo S, Kim M, Kurita S, Ishii H, Shimada H. Cognitive frailty as a risk factor for incident disability during late life: a 24-month follow-up longitudinal study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24:494–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1365-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1365-9
pubmed: 32346687
Chen WT, Chou KH, Liu LK, Lee PL, Lee WJ, Chen LK, Wang PN, Lin CP. Reduced cerebellar gray matter is a neural signature of physical frailty. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36:3666–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22870 .
doi: 10.1002/hbm.22870
pubmed: 26096356
pmcid: 6869536
Liu LK, Chou KH, Hsu CCH, Peng LN, Lee WJ, Chen WT, Lin CP, Chung CP, Wang PN, Chen LK. Cerebellar-limbic neurocircuit is the novel biosignature of physio-cognitive decline syndrome. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12:25319–36. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.104135 .
doi: 10.18632/aging.104135
pubmed: 33234736
pmcid: 7803525
Nishita Y, Nakamura A, Kato T, Otsuka R, Iwata K, Tange C, Ando F, Ito K, Shimokata H, Arai H. Links between physical frailty and regional gray matter volumes in older adults: a voxel-based morphometry study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019;20:1587–1592.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.001
pubmed: 31685397
Bettio LEB, Rajendran L, Gil-Mohapel J. The effects of aging in the hippocampus and cognitive decline. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;79:66–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.030 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.030
pubmed: 28476525
Tedesco AM, Chiricozzi FR, Clausi S, Lupo M, Molinari M, Leggio MG. The cerebellar cognitive profile. Brain. 2011;134:3672–86.
pubmed: 22036960
doi: 10.1093/brain/awr266
Raz N, Lindenberger U, Rodrigue KM, Kennedy KM, Head D, Williamson A, Dahle C, Gerstorf D, Acker JD. Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15:1676–89.
pubmed: 15703252
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi044
Damoiseaux JS, Beckman CF, Sanz Arigita EJ, Barkhof F, Scheltens PH, Stam CJ, Rombouts SARB. Reduced resting-state brain activity in the “default network” in normal aging. Cerebral Cortex. 2008;18:1856–64.
pubmed: 18063564
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm207
Andrews-Hanna JR, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Lustig C, Head D, Raichle ME, Buckner RL. Disruption of large-scale brain systems in advanced aging. Neuron. 2007;56:924–35.
pubmed: 18054866
pmcid: 2709284
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.038
Wu T, Zang Y, Wang L, Long X, Hallett M, Chen Y, Chan P. Aging influence on functional connectivity of the motor network in the resting state. Neurosci Lett. 2007;42:164–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.06.011
Habas C, Kamdar N, Nguyen D, Prater K, Beckmann CF, Menon V, Greicius MD. Distinct cerebellar contributions to intrinsic connectivity networks. J Neurosci. 2009;29:8586–94.
pubmed: 19571149
pmcid: 2742620
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1868-09.2009
O’Reilly JX, Beckmann CF, Tomassini V, Ramnani N, Johansen-Berg H. Distinct and overlapping functional zones in the cerebellum defined by resting state functional connectivity. Cerebral Cortex. 2010;20:953–65.
pubmed: 19684249
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp157
Maguire EA, Frith CD. Aging affects the engagement of the hippocampus during autobiographical memory retrieval. Brain. 2003;126:1511–23.
pubmed: 12805116
doi: 10.1093/brain/awg157
Reitz C, Brayne C, Mayeux R. Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011;7:137–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2011.2 .
doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.2
pubmed: 21304480
pmcid: 3339565
Camicioli RM. Mild motor impairment: motor change preceding mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Alzheimers Dementia. 2010;6:S92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2010.05.282 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.05.282
Bruchhage MMK, Correia S, Malloy P, Salloway S, Deoni S. Machine learning classification identifies cerebellar contributions to early and moderate cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:524024.
pubmed: 33240072
pmcid: 7669549
doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.524024
Ito M. The Cerebellum: Brain for an implicit self. New Jersey: Upper Saddle River; 2012.
Stoodley CJ, Desmond JE, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography of the human cerebellum revealed by functional neuroimaging studies. In: Handbook of the cerebellum and cerebellar disorders. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2013. p. 1717–51.
Leto K, Arancillo M, Becker EBE, Buffo A, Chiang C, et al. Consensus paper: cerebellar development. Cerebellum. 2016;15(6):789–828.
pubmed: 26439486
doi: 10.1007/s12311-015-0724-2
Tiemeier H, Lenroot RK, Greenstein DK, Tran L, Pierson R, Giedd JN. Cerebellar development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal morphometric MRI study. NeuroImage. 2010;49(1):67–70.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.016
Gauvrit T, Benderradji H, Buee L, Blum D, Vieau D. Early-Life Environment Influence on Late-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease. Frontiers Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:834661–1.
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.834661
Serra L, Cercignani M, Lenzi D, Perri R, Fadda L, Caltagirone C, Macaluso E, Bozzali M. Grey and white matter changes at different stages of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;19(1):147–59.
pubmed: 20061634
doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1223
Sullivan EV, Pfefferbaum A. Diffusion tensor imaging and aging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(6):749–61.
pubmed: 16887187
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.002
Limperopolous C, Chilingaryan G, Sullivan N, Guizard N, Robertson RL, du Plessis AJ. Injury to the premature cerebellum: outcome is related to remote cortical development. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24(3):728–36.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs354
Piller S. Blots on a field? Science. 2022;377(6604) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade0209 .
Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain. 1998;141:561–79.
doi: 10.1093/brain/121.4.561
Schmahmann JD, Guell X, Stoodley CJ, Halko MA. the theory and neuroscience of cerebellar cognition. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2019;42(1):337–64.
pubmed: 30939101
doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-070918-050258
Frangou S, Modabbernia A, Williams SCR, Papachristou E, Doucet GE, et al. Cortical thickness across the lifespan: Data from 17,075 healthy individuals aged 3–90 years. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2022;43(1):431–51.
pubmed: 33595143
doi: 10.1002/hbm.25364
Hoogendam YY, van der Geest JN, van der Lijn F, van der Lugt A, Niessen WJ, et al. Determinants of cerebellar and cerebral volume in the general elderly population. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(12):2774–81.
pubmed: 22405042
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.02.012
Buhrmann A, Brands AMA, van der Grond J, Schilder C, van der Mast RC, et al. Cerebellar grey matter volume in older persons is associated with worse cognitive functioning. Cerebellum. 2021;20:9–20.
pubmed: 32816194
doi: 10.1007/s12311-020-01148-0
Chaudhari K, Wang L, Kruse J, Winters A, Sumien N, et al. Early loss of cerebellar Purkinje cells in human and a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurol Res. 2021;43(7):570–81.
pubmed: 33688799
pmcid: 8169538
doi: 10.1080/01616412.2021.1893566
Mavroudis I, Petridis F, Kazis D, Njau S, Costa V, Baloyannis S. Purkinje cells pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2019;34(7):439–49.
pubmed: 31256608
doi: 10.1177/1533317519859200
Mavroudis IA, Fotiou DF, Adipepe LF, Manani MG, Njau SD, et al. Morphological changes of the human purkinje cells and deposition of neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles on the cerebellar cortex of Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2010;25(7):585–91.
pubmed: 20870670
doi: 10.1177/1533317510382892
Guo CC, Tan R, Hodges JR, Hu X, Sami S, Hornberger M. Network-selective vulnerability of the human cerebellum to Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2016;139(5):1527–38.
pubmed: 26912642
pmcid: 5839595
doi: 10.1093/brain/aww003
Lin CY, Chen CH, Tom SE, Kuo SH. cerebellar volume is associated with cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment: results from ADNI. Cerebellum. 2020;19(2):217–25.
pubmed: 31900856
pmcid: 7085462
doi: 10.1007/s12311-019-01099-1
Pagen LHG, Van De Ven VG, Gronenschild EHBM, Priovoulos N, Verhey FRJ, Jacobs HIL. 2020. Contributions of cerebro-cerebellar default mode connectivity patterns to memory performance in mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimer Dis. 2020;75(2):633–47.
doi: 10.3233/JAD-191127
Guell X. Functional gradients of the cerebellum: a review of practical applications. Cerebellum. 2022;21(6):1061–72.
pubmed: 34741753
doi: 10.1007/s12311-021-01342-8
Guell X, Schmahmann J. Cerebellar Functional anatomy: a didactic summary based on human fMRI evidence. Cerebellum. 2020;19:1–5.
pubmed: 31707620
doi: 10.1007/s12311-019-01083-9
Guell X, Schmahmann J, Gabrieli J, Ghosh S. Functional gradients of the cerebellum. Elife. 2018;7:e36652.
pubmed: 30106371
pmcid: 6092123
doi: 10.7554/eLife.36652
Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239–59.
pubmed: 1759558
doi: 10.1007/BF00308809
Nelson PT, Alafuzoff I, Bigio EH, Bouras C, Braak H, et al. Correlation of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes with cognitive status: a review of the literature. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2012;71:362–81.
pubmed: 22487856
doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31825018f7
Cole G, Neal JW, Singhrao SK, Jasani B, Newman GR. The distribution of amyloid plaques in the cerebellum and brain stem in Down’s syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease: a light microscopical analysis. Acta Neuropathol. 1993;85(5):542–52.
pubmed: 8493862
doi: 10.1007/BF00230495
Ghisays V, Lopera F, Goradia DD, Protas HD, Malek-Ahmadi MH, et al. PET evidence of preclinical cerebellar amyloid plaque deposition in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease-causing Presenilin-1 E280A mutation carriers. NeuroImage Clin. 2021;31:102749.
pubmed: 34252876
pmcid: 8278433
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102749
Wang H, D’Andrea M, Nagele R. Cerebellar diffuse amyloid plaques are derived from dendritic Abeta42 accumulations in Purkinje cells. Neurobiol Aging. 2002;23(2):213–23.
pubmed: 11804705
doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00279-2
Shimada H, Minatani S, Takeuchi J, Takeda A, Kawabe J, et al. Heavy tau burden with subtle amyloid beta accumulation in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum in a case of familial alzheimer’s disease with app osaka mutation. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(12):4443.
pubmed: 32580499
pmcid: 7352205
doi: 10.3390/ijms21124443
Jacobs HIL, Becker JA, Kwong K, Engels-Domínguez N, Prokopiou PC, et al. In vivo and neuropathology data support locus coeruleus integrity as indicator of Alzheimer’s disease pathology and cognitive decline. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(612):eabj2511.
pubmed: 34550726
pmcid: 8641759
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj2511
Del Cerro I, Villarreal MF, Abulafia C, Duarte-Abritta B, Sánchez SM, et al. Disrupted functional connectivity of the locus coeruleus in healthy adults with parental history of Alzheimer’s disease. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;123:81–8.
pubmed: 32044590
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.01.018
Olivito G, Serra L, Marra C, Di Domenico C, Caltagirone C, et al. Cerebellar dentate nucleus functional connectivity with cerebral cortex in Alzheimer’s disease and memory: a seed-based approach. Neurobiol Aging. 2020;89:32–40.
pubmed: 32081466
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.10.026
Tang F, Zhu D, Ma W, Yao Q, Li Q, Shi J. Differences changes in cerebellar functional connectivity between mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a seed-based approach. Front Neurol. 2021;12:645171.
pubmed: 34220669
pmcid: 8248670
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.645171
Zhou Z, Zhu R, Shao W, Zhang SJ, Wang L, et al. Changes in resting-State Functional Connectivity of Cerebellum in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a case-control study. Front Syst Neurosci. 2021;15:596221.
pubmed: 33790747
pmcid: 8006280
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.596221
Woodruff-Pak DS. Eyeblink classical conditioning differentiates normal aging from Alzheimer’s Disease. Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 2001;36(2):87–108.
pubmed: 11666044
doi: 10.1007/BF02734044
Woodruff-Pak DS, Foy MR, Akopian GG, Lee KH, Zach J, et al. Differential effects and rates of normal aging in cerebellum and hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA). 2010;107(4):1624–9.
pubmed: 20080589
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914207107
Schmahmann JD, Weilburg JB, Sherman JC. The neuropsychiatry of the cerebellum - insights from the clinic. Cerebellum. 2007;6:254–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14734220701490995 .
doi: 10.1080/14734220701490995
pubmed: 17786822
Depping MS, Schmitgen MM, Kubera KM, Wolf RC. cerebellar contributions to major depression. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:634. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00634 .
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00634
pubmed: 30555360
pmcid: 6281716
Grieve SM, Korgaonkar MS, Koslow SH, Gordon E, Williams LM. Widespread reductions in gray matter volume in depression. NeuroImage Clin. 2013;3:332–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2013.08.016 .
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.08.016
pubmed: 24273717
pmcid: 3814952
Lai CH, Wu YT. The gray matter alterations in major depressive disorder and panic disorder: Putative differences in the pathogenesis. J Affective Disord. 2015;186:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.022 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.022
Xu LY, Xu FC, Liu C, Ji YF, Wu JM, Wang Y, Wang HB, Yu YQ. Relationship between cerebellar structure and emotional memory in depression. Brain Behav. 2017;7:e00738. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.738 .
doi: 10.1002/brb3.738
pubmed: 28729943
pmcid: 5516611
Zhang YN, Li H, Shen ZW, Xu C, Huang YJ, Wu RH. Healthy individuals vs patients with bipolar or unipolar depression in gray matter volume. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9:1304–17. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i6.1304 .
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i6.1304
pubmed: 33644197
pmcid: 7896697
Depping MS, Wolf ND, Vasic N, Sambataro F, Hirjak D, Thomann PA, Wolf RC. Abnormal cerebellar volume in acute and remitted major depression. Progr Neuro-psychopharmacol Biol Psych. 2016;71:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2016.06.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2016.06.005
Depping MS, Nolte HM, Hirjak D, Palm E, Hofer S, Stieltjes B, Maier-Hein K, Sambataro F, Wolf RC, Thomann PA. Cerebellar volume change in response to electroconvulsive therapy in patients with major depression. Progr Neuro-psychopharmacol Biol Psych. 2017;73:31–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2016.09.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2016.09.007
Bogoian HR, King TZ, Turner JA, Semmel ES, Dotson VM. Linking depressive symptom dimensions to cerebellar subregion volumes in later life. Translat Psychiatry. 2020;10:201. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-00883-6 .
doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-00883-6
Li J, Gong H, Xu H, Ding Q, He N, Huang Y, Jin Y, Zhang C, Voon V, Sun B, Yan F, Zhan S. Abnormal voxel-wise degree centrality in patients with late-life depression: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:1024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01024 .
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01024
pubmed: 32082198
Liu F, Hu M, Wang S, Guo W, Zhao J, Li J, Xun G, Long Z, Zhang J, Wang Y, Zeng L, Gao Q, Wooderson SC, Chen J, Chen H. Abnormal regional spontaneous neural activity in first-episode, treatment-naive patients with late-life depression: a resting-state fMRI study. Progr Neuro-psychopharmacol Biol Psych. 2012;39:326–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.07.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.07.004
Avedisova AS, Samotaeva IS, Luzin RV, Semenovyh NS, Sergunova KA, Akzhigitov RG, Zakharova RV. Apathy in depression: a morphometric analysis. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2019;119:141–7. https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro2019119051141 .
doi: 10.17116/jnevro2019119051141
pubmed: 31317903
Salo KI, Scharfen J, Wilden ID, Schubotz RI, Holling H. Confining the Concept of Vascular Depression to late-onset depression: a meta-analysis of MRI-defined hyperintensity burden in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01241 .
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01241
pubmed: 31214072
pmcid: 6555192
Ataullah AHM, Naqvi IA. Cerebellar dysfunction. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2022.
Sen P, Shah PP, Nativio R, Berger SL. Epigenetic mechanisms of longevity and aging. Cell. 2016;166:822–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.050 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.050
pubmed: 27518561
pmcid: 5821249
Flurkey K, Papaconstantinou J, Miller RA, Harrison DE. Lifespan extension and delayed immune and collagen aging in mutant mice with defects in growth hormone production. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA). 2001;98:6736.
pubmed: 11371619
doi: 10.1073/pnas.111158898
Choi H, Joe S, Nam H. Development of tissue-specific age predictors using DNA methylation data. Genes. 2019:10. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10110888 .
El Khoury LY, Gorrie-Stone T, Smart M, Hughes A, Bao Y, Andrayas A, et al. Systematic underestimation of the epigenetic clock and age acceleration in older subjects. Genome Biol. 2019;20:1–10.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1810-4
Hannum G, Guinney J, Zhao L, Zhang L, Hughes G, Sadda S, Klotzle B, Bibikova M, Fan JB, Gao Y, Deconde R, Chen M, Rajapakse I, Friend S, Ideker T, Zhang K. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol Cell. 2013;49:359–67.
pubmed: 23177740
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016
Li X, Li W, Xu Y. Human age prediction based on DNA methylation using a gradient boosting regressor. Genes. 2018:9. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9090424 .
Bryant P, Elofsson A. The relationship between ageing and changes in the human blood and brain methylomes. NAR Genom Bioinform. 2022:4. https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqac001 .
Reynolds LM, Taylor JR, Ding J, Lohman K, Johnson C, Siscovick D, et al. Age-related variations in the methylome associated with gene expression in human monocytes and T cells. Nat Commun. 2014:5. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6366 .
Lu AT, Hannon E, Levine ME, Hao K, Crimmins EM, Lunnon K, et al. Genetic variants near MLST8 and DHX57 affect the epigenetic age of the cerebellum. Nat Commun. 2016:7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10561 .
Jin Z, Liu Y. DNA methylation in human diseases. Genes Dis. 2018;5:1.
pubmed: 30258928
pmcid: 6147084
doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2018.01.002
Slieker RC, Relton CL, Gaunt TR, Slagboom PE, Heijmans BT. Age-related DNA methylation changes are tissue-specific with ELOVL2 promoter methylation as exception. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2018;11:1–11.
doi: 10.1186/s13072-018-0191-3
Moore LD, Le T, Fan G. DNA Methylation and Its Basic Function. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012;38:23–38.
doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.112
Seidler RD, Bernard JA, Burutolu TB, Fling BW, Gordon MT, Gwin JT, et al. Motor control and aging: links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;34:721.
pubmed: 19850077
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.005
Lu AT, Quach A, Wilson JG, Reiner AP, Aviv A, Raj K, et al. DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan. Aging. 2019:11. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101684 .
Raz N, Ghisletta P, Rodrigue KM, Kennedy KM, Lindenberger U. Trajectories of brain aging in middle-aged and older adults: regional and individual differences. Neuroimage. 2010;51(2):501–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.020 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.020
pubmed: 20298790
Ramanoël S, Hoyau E, Kauffmann L, Renard F, Pichat C, Boudiaf N, et al. Gray matter volume and cognitive performance during normal aging. a voxel-based morphometry study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00235 .
doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00235
pubmed: 30123123
pmcid: 6085481
Nyberg L, Lövdén M, Riklund K, Lindenberger U, Bäckman L. Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012;16(5):292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.005
pubmed: 22542563
Verghese J, Lipton RB, Katz MJ, Hall CB, Derby CA, Kuslansky G, et al. Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(25):2508–16. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022252 .
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022252
pubmed: 12815136
Zatorre RJ, Chen JL, Penhune VB. When the brain plays music: auditory-motor interactions in music perception and production. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(7):547–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2152 .
doi: 10.1038/nrn2152
pubmed: 17585307
Hutchinson S, Lee LH, Gaab N, Schlaug G. Cerebellar volume of musicians. Cereb Cortex. 2003;13(9):943–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/13.9.943 .
doi: 10.1093/cercor/13.9.943
pubmed: 12902393
Paquette S, Fujii S, Li HC, Schlaug G. The cerebellum’s contribution to beat interval discrimination. Neuroimage. 2017;163:177–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.017 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.017
pubmed: 28916178
Yamashita M, Ohsawa C, Suzuki M, Guo X, Sadakata M, Otsuka Y, et al. Neural advantages of older musicians involve the cerebellum: implications for healthy aging through lifelong musical instrument training. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022;15:784026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.784026 .
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.784026
pubmed: 35069154
pmcid: 8766763
Olivito G, Lupo M, Iacobacci C, Clausi S, Romano S, Masciullo M, et al. Structural cerebellar correlates of cognitive functions in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. J Neurol. 2018;265(3):597–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-8738-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8738-6
pubmed: 29356974
Baumann S, Koeneke S, Schmidt CF, Meyer M, Lutz K, Jancke L. A network for audio-motor coordination in skilled pianists and non-musicians. Brain Res. 2007;1161:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.05.045 .
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.05.045
pubmed: 17603027
Hanakawa T, Immisch I, Toma K, Dimyan MA, Van Gelderen P, Hallett M. Functional properties of brain areas associated with motor execution and imagery. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89(2):989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00132.2002 .
doi: 10.1152/jn.00132.2002
pubmed: 12574475
Meister IG, Krings T, Foltys H, Boroojerdi B, Müller M, Töpper R, et al. Playing piano in the mind—an fMRI study on music imagery and performance in pianists. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004;19(3):219–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.005
pubmed: 15062860
Watanabe T, Yagishita S, Kikyo H. Memory of music: roles of right hippocampus and left inferior frontal gyrus. Neuroimage. 2008;39(1):483–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.024 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.024
pubmed: 17905600
Herholz SC, Coffey EBJ, Pantev C, Zatorre RJ. Dissociation of neural networks for predisposition and for training-related plasticity in auditory-motor learning. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26(7):3125–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv138 .
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv138
pubmed: 26139842
Mitoma H, Manto M, Hampe CS. Time is cerebellum. Cerebellum. 2018;17(4):387–91.
pubmed: 29460203
pmcid: 6028834
doi: 10.1007/s12311-018-0925-6
Mitoma H, Buffo A, Gelfo F, Guell X, Fucà E, Kakei S, et al. Consensus paper. Cerebellar reserve: From cerebellar physiology to cerebellar disorders. Cerebellum. 2020;19(1):131–53.
pubmed: 31879843
doi: 10.1007/s12311-019-01091-9
Mitoma H, Kakei S, Yamaguchi K, Manto M. Physiology of cerebellar reserve: redundancy and plasticity of a modular machine. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(9):4777.
pubmed: 33946358
pmcid: 8124536
doi: 10.3390/ijms22094777
Manto M, Kakei S, Mitoma H. The critical need to develop tools assessing cerebellar reserve for the delivery and assessment of non-invasive cerebellar stimulation. Cerebell Ataxias. 2021;8(1):2.
doi: 10.1186/s40673-020-00126-w
Holmes G. The symptoms of acute cerebellar injuries due to gunshot injuries. Brain. 1917;40:461–535.
doi: 10.1093/brain/40.4.461
Stern Y. Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(11):1006–12.
pubmed: 23079557
pmcid: 3507991
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70191-6
Stern Y. An approach to studying the neural correlates of reserve. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017;11(2):410–6.
pubmed: 27450378
pmcid: 5810375
doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9566-x
Palmer SJ, Ng B, Abugharbieh R, Eigenraam L, McKeown MJ. Motor reserve and novel area recruitment: Amplitude and spatial characteristics of compensation in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;29(11):2187–96.
pubmed: 19490021
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06753.x
Colin F, Ris L, Godaux E. Neuroanatomy of the cerebellum. In: Manto M, Pandolfo M, editors. The cerebellum and Its Disorders. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 6–29.
Walloe S, Pakkenberg B, Fabricius K. Stereological estimation of total cell numbers in the human cerebral and cerebellar cortex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:508.
pubmed: 25076882
pmcid: 4097828
Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science. 1995;269(5232):1880–2.
pubmed: 7569931
doi: 10.1126/science.7569931
Popa LS, Hewitt AL, Ebner TJ. Purkinje cell simple spike discharge encodes error signals consistent with a forward internal model. Cerebellum. 2013;12(3):331–3.
pubmed: 23361619
pmcid: 3643991
doi: 10.1007/s12311-013-0452-4
Tanaka H, Ishikawa T, Kakei S. Neural evidence of the cerebellum as a state predictor. Cerebellum. 2019;18(3):349–71.
pubmed: 30627965
pmcid: 6517560
doi: 10.1007/s12311-018-0996-4
Tanaka H, Ishikawa T, Lee J, Kakei S. The cerebro-cerebellum as a locus of forward model. A review. Front Syst Neurosci. 2020;14:19.
pubmed: 32327978
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00019
Wu HS, Sugihara I, Shinoda Y. Projection patterns of single mossy fibers originating from the lateral reticular nucleus in the rat cerebellar cortex and nuclei. J Comp Neurol. 1999;411:97–118.
pubmed: 10404110
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990816)411:1<97::AID-CNE8>3.0.CO;2-O
Apps R, Hawkes R, Aoki S, Bengtsson F, Brown AM, Chen G, et al. Cerebellar modules and their role as operational cerebellar processing units: a consensus paper [corrected]. Cerebellum. 2018;17(5):654–82.
pubmed: 29876802
pmcid: 6132822
doi: 10.1007/s12311-018-0952-3
De Zeeuw CI, Lisberger SG, Raymond JL. Diversity and dynamics in the cerebellum. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24:160–7.
pubmed: 33288911
doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00754-9
Hirano T. Around LTD hypothesis in motor learning. Cerebellum. 2014;13(5):645–50.
pubmed: 24974094
doi: 10.1007/s12311-014-0581-4
Schmahmann JD. From movement to thought: Anatomic substrates of the cerebellar contribution to cognitive processing. Hum Brain Mapp. 1996;4(3):174–98.
pubmed: 20408197
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1996)4:3<174::AID-HBM3>3.0.CO;2-0
Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN. The cerebrocerebellar system. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1997;41:31–60.
pubmed: 9378595
doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(08)60346-3
Kelly RM, Strick PL. Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J Neurosci. 2003;23(23):8432–44.
pubmed: 12968006
pmcid: 6740694
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-23-08432.2003
Guell X, Hoche F, Schmahmann JD. Metalinguistic deficits in patients with cerebellar dysfunction: empirical support for the dysmetria of thought theory. Cerebellum. 2015;14(1):50–8.
pubmed: 25503825
doi: 10.1007/s12311-014-0630-z
Thal DR, Rüb U, Orantes M, Braak H. Phases of A beta-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology. 2002;58(12):1791–800.
pubmed: 12084879
doi: 10.1212/WNL.58.12.1791
Blennow K, Bogdanovic N, Alafuzoff I, Ekman R, Davidsson P. Synaptic pathology in Alzheimer’s disease: Relation to severity of dementia, but not to senile plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, or the ApoE4 allele. J Neural Transm. 1996;103(5):603–18.
pubmed: 8811505
doi: 10.1007/BF01273157
Wu T, Hallett M. The cerebellum in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2013;136(3):696–709.
pubmed: 23404337
pmcid: 7273201
doi: 10.1093/brain/aws360
Arnold Anteraper S, Guell X, D’Mello A, Joshi N, Whitfield- Gabrieli S, Joshi G. Disrupted cerebro-cerebellar intrinsic functional connectivity in young adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: a data-driven, whole-brain, high temporal resolution fMRI study. Brain Connect. 2019;9(1):48–59.
pubmed: 29896995
doi: 10.1089/brain.2018.0581
Moberget T, Doan NT, Alnæs D, Kaufmann T, Córdova-Palomera A, Lagerberg TV, et al. Cerebellar volume and cerebellocerebral structural covariance in schizophrenia: a multisite mega-analysis of 983 patients and 1349 healthy controls. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23(6):1512–20.
pubmed: 28507318
doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.106
Andersen BB, Gundersen HJ, Pakkenberg B. Aging of the human cerebellum: a stereological study. J Comp Neurol. 2003;466(3):356–65.
pubmed: 14556293
doi: 10.1002/cne.10884
Fernández-Ruiz J, Hall C, Vergara P, Díaz R. Prism adaptation in normal aging: slower adaptation rate and larger aftereffect. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2009;9(3):223–6.
doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00057-9
King BR, Fogel SM, Albouy G, Doyon J. Neural correlates of the age-related changes in motor sequence learning and motor adaptation in older adults. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:142.
pubmed: 23616757
pmcid: 3628357
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00142
Hashimoto Y, Honda T, Matsumura K, Nakao M, Soga K, Katano K, et al. Quantitative evaluation of human cerebellum-dependent motor learning through prism adaptation of hand-reaching movement. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119376.
pubmed: 25785588
pmcid: 4364988
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119376
Van Dun K, Mitoma H, Manto M. Cerebellar cortex as a therapeutic target for neurostimulation. Cerebellum. 2018;17(6):777–87.
pubmed: 30276522
doi: 10.1007/s12311-018-0976-8
Nuzzo C, Ruggiero F, Cortese F, Cova I, Priori A, Ferrucci R. Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation in cerebellar disorders. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2018;17(3):193–8.
pubmed: 29623859
doi: 10.2174/1871527317666180404113444
Sadeghihassanabadi F, Frey BM, Backhaus W, Choe CU, Zittel S, Schön G, Bönstrup M, Cheng B, Thomalla G, Gerloff C, Schulz R. Structural cerebellar reserve positively influences outcome after severe stroke. Brain Commun. 2022;4(6):fcac203.
pubmed: 36337341
pmcid: 9629400
doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac203
Pini L, Manenti R, Cotelli M, Pizzini FB, Frisoni GB, Pievani M. Non-invasive brain stimulation in dementia: a complex network story. NDD [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 May 28];18:281–301. Available from: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/495945
Koppelmans V, Hoogendam YY, Hirsiger S, Mérillat S, Jäncke L, Seidler RD. Regional cerebellar volumetric correlates of manual motor and cognitive function. Brain Struct Function. 2017;222:1929–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-016-1317-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s00429-016-1317-7
Reuter-Lorenz PA, Park DC. Human neuroscience and the aging mind: a new look at old problems. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010;65B:405–15.
pmcid: 2883872
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq035
Holviala J, Kraemer WJ, Sillanpää E, Karppinen H, Avela J, Kauhanen A, et al. Effects of strength, endurance and combined training on muscle strength, walking speed and dynamic balance in aging men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:1335–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2089-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2089-7
pubmed: 21796409
Woods AJ, Antal A, Bikson M, Boggio PS, Brunoni AR, Celnik P, et al. A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clinical Neurophysiol. 2016;127:1031–48.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012
Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol (Lond). 2000;527:633–9.
pubmed: 10990547
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x
Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M, Bermpohl F, Antal A, Feredoes E, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp Brain Res. 2005;166:23–30.
pubmed: 15999258
doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2334-6
Lindberg PG, Verneau M, Boterff QL, Cuenca-Maia M, Baron J-C, Maier MA. Age- and task-dependent effects of cerebellar tDCS on manual dexterity and motor learning–a preliminary study. Neurophysiologie Clin. 2022;52(5):354–65.
doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2022.07.006
Yosephi MH, Ehsani F, Zoghi M, Jaberzadeh S. Multi-session anodal tDCS enhances the effects of postural training on balance and postural stability in older adults with high fall risk: Primary motor cortex versus cerebellar stimulation. Brain Stim. 2018;11:1239–50.
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.07.044
Hardwick RM, Celnik PA. Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances motor learning in older adults. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35:2217–21.
pubmed: 24792908
pmcid: 4087063
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.03.030
Weightman M, Brittain J-S, Punt D, Miall RC, Jenkinson N. Targeted tDCS selectively improves motor adaptation with the proximal and distal upper limb. Brain Stim. 2020;13:707–16.
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.013
Hulst T, John L, Küper M, van der Geest JN, Göricke SL, Donchin O, et al. Cerebellar patients do not benefit from cerebellar or M1 transcranial direct current stimulation during force-field reaching adaptation. J Neurophysiol. 2017;118:732–48.
pubmed: 28469001
pmcid: 5539455
doi: 10.1152/jn.00808.2016
Rauscher M, Yavari F, Batsikadze G, Ludolph N, Ilg W, Nitsche MA, et al. Lack of cerebellar tDCS effects on learning of a complex whole body dynamic balance task in middle-aged (50–65 years) adults. Neurol Res Pract. 2020;2:38.
pubmed: 33324938
pmcid: 7650141
doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00085-x
Oldrati V, Schutter DJLG. Targeting the Human Cerebellum with transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate behavior: a meta-analysis. Cerebellum. 2018;17:228–36.
pubmed: 28786014
doi: 10.1007/s12311-017-0877-2
Raz N, Torres IJ, Spencer WD, White K, Acker JD. Age-related regional differences in cerebellar vermis observed in vivo. Arch Neurol. 1992;49:412–6.
pubmed: 1558523
doi: 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530280106030
Shah SA, Doraiswamy PM, Husain MM, Figiel GS, Boyko OB, McDonald WM, et al. Assessment of posterior fossa structures with midsagittal MRI: The effects of age. Neurobiol Aging. 1991;12:371–4.
pubmed: 1961373
doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(91)90025-F
Abe O, Yamasue H, Aoki S, Suga M, Yamada H, Kasai K, et al. Aging in the CNS: Comparison of gray/white matter volume and diffusion tensor data. Neurobiol Aging. 2008;29:102–16.
pubmed: 17023094
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.09.003
Lee JY, Lyoo IK, Kim SU, Jang HS, Lee DW, Jeon HJ, et al. Intellect declines in healthy elderly subjects and cerebellum. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005;59:45–51.
pubmed: 15679539
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2005.01330.x
Paul R, Grieve SM, Chaudary B, Gordon N, Lawrence J, Cooper N, et al. Relative contributions of the cerebellar vermis and prefrontal lobe volumes on cognitive function across the adult lifespan. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30:457–65.
pubmed: 17869383
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.07.017
Donchin O, Rabe K, Diedrichsen J, Lally N, Schoch B, Gizewski ER, et al. Cerebellar regions involved in adaptation to force field and visuomotor perturbation. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107:134–47.
pubmed: 21975446
doi: 10.1152/jn.00007.2011
Parazzini M, Rossi E, Ferrucci R, Liorni I, Priori A, Ravazzani P. Modelling the electric field and the current density generated by cerebellar transcranial DC stimulation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125:577–84.
pubmed: 24176297
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.09.039
Ferrucci R, Cortese F, Priori A. Cerebellar tDCS: how to do it. Cerebellum. 2015;14:27–30.
pubmed: 25231432
doi: 10.1007/s12311-014-0599-7
Galea JM, Jayaram G, Ajagbe L, Celnik P. Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific non-invasive direct current stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009;29:9115–22.
pubmed: 19605648
pmcid: 2760225
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2184-09.2009
Galea JM, Vazquez A, Pasricha N, Orban de Xivry J-J, Celnik P. Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. Cerebral Cortex. 2011;21:1761–70.
pubmed: 21139077
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq246
Rampersad SM, Janssen AM, Lucka F, Aydin Ü, Lanfer B, Lew S, et al. Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng. 2014;22:441–52.
doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2308997
Grimaldi G, Argyropoulos GP, Bastian A, Cortes M, Davis NJ, Edwards DJ, et al. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS): a novel approach to understanding cerebellar function in health and disease. Neuroscientist. 2016;22:83–97.
pubmed: 25406224
pmcid: 4712385
doi: 10.1177/1073858414559409
Rezaee Z, Dutta A. Cerebellar Lobules Optimal Stimulation (CLOS): a computational pipeline to optimize cerebellar lobule-specific electric field distribution. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:266.
pubmed: 31031578
pmcid: 6473058
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00266
Summers JJ, Kang N, Cauraugh JH. Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance cognitive and motor functions in the ageing brain? A systematic review and meta- analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;25:42–54.
pubmed: 26607412
doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2015.11.004
Habich A, Fehér KD, Antonenko D, Boraxbekk C-J, Flöel A, Nissen C, et al. Stimulating aged brains with transcranial direct current stimulation: opportunities and challenges. Psychiatry Res: neuroimaging. 2020;306:111179.
pubmed: 32972813
doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111179
Klaus J, Schutter DJLG. Electrode montage-dependent intracranial variability in electric fields induced by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation. Sci Rep. 2021;11:22183.
pubmed: 34773062
pmcid: 8589967
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01755-9
Rezaee Z, Dutta A. Lobule-specific dosage considerations for cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation during healthy aging: a computational modeling study using age-specific magnetic resonance imaging templates. Neuromodulation. 2020;23:341–65.
pubmed: 31995268
doi: 10.1111/ner.13098
Mahdavi S, Towhidkhah F. Computational human head models of tDCS: influence of brain atrophy on current density distribution. Brain Stim. 2018;11:104–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.09.013
Jessica DS. Resting-state fMRI as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease? Alzheimers Res Ther. 2012;4(2):8.
De Sanctis P, Solis-Escalante T, Seeber M, Wagner J, Ferris DP, Gramann K. Time to move: Brain dynamics underlying natural action and cognition. Eur J Neurosci. 2021;54(12):8075–80.
pubmed: 34904290
pmcid: 10454984
doi: 10.1111/ejn.15562
Delaux A, de Saint Aubert JB, Ramanoël S, Bécu M, Gehrke L, Klug M, Chavarriaga R, Sahel JA, Gramann K, Arleo A. Mobile brain/body imaging of landmark-based navigation with high-density EEG. Eur J Neurosci. 2021;54(12):8256–82.
pubmed: 33738880
pmcid: 9291975
doi: 10.1111/ejn.15190
Rocco G, Delaire E, Ramanoël S, Meste O, Magnié-Mauro MN, Grova C, Lebrun J. Densifying optodes montage to enhance cerebellar fNRIS. Boston, USA: The Society for functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS); 2022.
Ferrucci R, Giannicola G, Rosa M, Fumagalli M, Boggio PS, Hallett M, Zago S, Priori A. Cerebellum and processing of negative facial emotions: cerebellar transcranial DC stimulation specifically enhances the emotional recognition of facial anger and sadness. Cogn Emot. 2012;26:786–99.
pubmed: 22077643
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.619520
To WT, De Ridder D, Hart J Jr, Vanneste S. Changing brain networks through non-invasive neuromodulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:128.
pubmed: 29706876
pmcid: 5908883
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00128
Maldonado T, Jackson TB, Bernard JA. Anodal cerebellar stimulation increases cortical activation: evidence for cerebellar scaffolding of cortical processing. Hum Brain Mapp. 2023;44(4):1666–82.
pubmed: 36468490
doi: 10.1002/hbm.26166
Beuriat PA, Cristofori I, Gordon B, Grafman J. The shifting role of the cerebellum in executive, emotional and social processing across the lifespan. Behav Brain Funct. 2022;18(1):6.
pubmed: 35484543
pmcid: 9047369
doi: 10.1186/s12993-022-00193-5
Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD. Evidence for topographic organization in the cerebellum of motor control versus cognitive and affective processing. Cortex. 2010;46(7):831–44.
pubmed: 20152963
pmcid: 2873095
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.008