Protocol for virtual physical examination in an observational, longitudinal study evaluating virtual outcome measures in SLE.
clinical trial
lupus erythematosus, systemic
outcome assessment, health care
Journal
Lupus science & medicine
ISSN: 2053-8790
Titre abrégé: Lupus Sci Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101633705
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2023
07 2023
Historique:
received:
21
04
2023
accepted:
26
05
2023
medline:
12
7
2023
pubmed:
11
7
2023
entrez:
10
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is a lack of data on the use of telemedicine (TM) in SLE. SLE outcome measures remain complex, and clinicians and clinical trialists have raised concerns about the accuracy of virtual disease activity measures. This study evaluates the level of agreement between virtual SLE outcome measures and face-to-face (F2F) encounter. Here, we describe the study design, virtual physical examination protocol and demographics for the first 50 patients evaluated. This is an observational, longitudinal study of 200 patients with SLE with varying levels of disease activity from 4 academic lupus centres serving diverse populations. Each study participant will be evaluated at a baseline and a follow-up visit. At each visit, participants are evaluated by the same physician first via a videoconference-based TM and then a F2F encounter. For this protocol, virtual physical examination guidelines relying on physician-directed patient self-examination were established. SLE disease activity measures will be completed immediately after the TM encounter and repeated after the F2F encounter for each visit. The degree of agreement between TM and F2F disease activity measures will be analysed using the Bland-Altman method. An interim analysis is planned after the enrolment of the first 50 participants. This study has been reviewed by the Columbia University Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB Protocol #: AAAT6574). The full results of this study will be published after the final data analysis of 200 patients. The abrupt shift to TM visits due to the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted clinical practice and clinical trials. Establishing a high level of agreement between SLE disease activity measures obtained with videoconference TM and F2F at the same time point, will allow for improved assessment of disease activity when F2F data cannot be acquired. This information may guide both medical decision-making and provide reliable outcome measures for clinical research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37429672
pii: 10/2/e000952
doi: 10.1136/lupus-2023-000952
pmc: PMC10335468
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jan;70(1):54-9
pubmed: 20833737
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Jun 7;17(1):99
pubmed: 31174541
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec;56(12):4113-9
pubmed: 18050213
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 1):953-62
pubmed: 15968009
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022 Oct;56:152045
pubmed: 35843158
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Feb 15;57(1):56-63
pubmed: 17266065
Lupus Sci Med. 2020 Mar 15;7(1):e000360
pubmed: 32201595
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):929-39
pubmed: 18305268
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct;34(5 Suppl 101):S54-S56
pubmed: 27762204
Lupus Sci Med. 2015 Mar 04;2(1):e000075
pubmed: 25861457
Arch Dermatol. 2008 Feb;144(2):173-80
pubmed: 18283174
Arthritis Res Ther. 2012 Mar 14;14(2):R61
pubmed: 22417647
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Dec 16;1:79
pubmed: 14678568
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 20;9:876835
pubmed: 35669922
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Oct 28;18(1):251
pubmed: 27793211
Lupus Sci Med. 2014 Apr 01;1(1):e000005
pubmed: 25396057
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Aug 15;57(6):972-9
pubmed: 17665467
RMD Open. 2015 Sep 14;1(1):e000146
pubmed: 26535150
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Dec;53(12):2175-81
pubmed: 24729400
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Sep;63(9):1224-32
pubmed: 21584945
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0253718
pubmed: 34242245
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2013 Jun;15(6):334
pubmed: 23606072
Lupus. 2022 Apr;31(4):488-494
pubmed: 35254169
Lupus. 2011 Oct;20(12):1285-92
pubmed: 21813589
Arthritis Rheum. 1992 Jun;35(6):630-40
pubmed: 1599520
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 15;353(24):2550-8
pubmed: 16354891
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(5):431
pubmed: 33842652
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2135-2136
pubmed: 32211830
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):958-67
pubmed: 24739325
J Rheumatol. 2011 Jun;38(6):1113-22
pubmed: 21285161
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):353-360
pubmed: 28511288
Arthritis Rheum. 1997 May;40(5):809-13
pubmed: 9153540
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct;54(10):3300-5
pubmed: 17009266
Rheumatol Immunol Res. 2021 Dec 15;2(3):139-145
pubmed: 36465071
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014 Jun;43(6):721-9
pubmed: 24332117
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Mar;35(3):248-54
pubmed: 8620300
Am J Med. 2021 Jan;134(1):48-51
pubmed: 32687813
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5 Suppl 39):S58-62
pubmed: 16273786
Biometrics. 1989 Mar;45(1):255-68
pubmed: 2720055
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 May 5;61(5):1795-1801
pubmed: 34352098