Bridging that gap: a qualitative study of perceptions of equality, diversity and inclusivity in colorectal surgery in the UK and Ireland.
colorectal surgery
medical ethics
quality in health care
surgery
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 07 2023
10 07 2023
Historique:
medline:
12
7
2023
pubmed:
11
7
2023
entrez:
10
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is a growing recognition on the importance of equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) within surgery and the need to diversify the surgical community and its various organisations, in a bidto reflect the diverse populations they serve. To create, sustain and encourage a diverse surgical workforce requires an in-depth understanding of the current makeup of key surgical institutions, relevant issues pertaining to EDI and appropriate solutions and strategies to ensure tangible change. Following on from the recent Kennedy Review into Diversity and Inclusion commissioned by the Royal College of Surgeons of England, the aim of this qualitative study was to understand the EDI issues which affected the membership of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, while seeking appropriate solutions to address them. Dedicated, online and qualitative focus groups. Colorectal surgeons, trainees and nurse specialists were recruited using a volunteer sampling strategy. A series of online, dedicated, qualitative focus groups across the 20 chapter regions were held. Each focus group was run informed by a structured topic guide. All participants who were given the opportunity to remain anonymous were offered a debriefing at the end. This study has been reported in keeping with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Between April and May 2021, a total number of 20 focus groups were conducted, with a total of 260 participants across 19 chapter regions. Seven themes and one standalone code pertaining to EDI were identified: support, unconscious behaviours, psychological consequences, bystander behaviour, preconceptions, inclusivity and meritocracy and the one standalone code was institutional accountability. Five themes were identified pertaining to potential strategies and solutions: education, affirmative action, transparency, professional support and mentorship. The evidence presented here is of a range of EDI issues which affect the working lives of those within colorectal surgery in the UK and Ireland, and of potential strategies and solutions which can help build a more inclusive, equitable and diverse colorectal community.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There is a growing recognition on the importance of equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) within surgery and the need to diversify the surgical community and its various organisations, in a bidto reflect the diverse populations they serve. To create, sustain and encourage a diverse surgical workforce requires an in-depth understanding of the current makeup of key surgical institutions, relevant issues pertaining to EDI and appropriate solutions and strategies to ensure tangible change.
OBJECTIVES
Following on from the recent Kennedy Review into Diversity and Inclusion commissioned by the Royal College of Surgeons of England, the aim of this qualitative study was to understand the EDI issues which affected the membership of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, while seeking appropriate solutions to address them.
DESIGN
Dedicated, online and qualitative focus groups.
PARTICIPANTS
Colorectal surgeons, trainees and nurse specialists were recruited using a volunteer sampling strategy.
METHODS
A series of online, dedicated, qualitative focus groups across the 20 chapter regions were held. Each focus group was run informed by a structured topic guide. All participants who were given the opportunity to remain anonymous were offered a debriefing at the end. This study has been reported in keeping with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.
RESULTS
Between April and May 2021, a total number of 20 focus groups were conducted, with a total of 260 participants across 19 chapter regions. Seven themes and one standalone code pertaining to EDI were identified: support, unconscious behaviours, psychological consequences, bystander behaviour, preconceptions, inclusivity and meritocracy and the one standalone code was institutional accountability. Five themes were identified pertaining to potential strategies and solutions: education, affirmative action, transparency, professional support and mentorship.
CONCLUSION
The evidence presented here is of a range of EDI issues which affect the working lives of those within colorectal surgery in the UK and Ireland, and of potential strategies and solutions which can help build a more inclusive, equitable and diverse colorectal community.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37429683
pii: bmjopen-2022-069297
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069297
pmc: PMC10335449
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e069297Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 31;381(18):1741-1752
pubmed: 31657887
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Oct;211(4):561-6
pubmed: 20868978
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jul;11(7):673-80
pubmed: 24993534
Ann Surg. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):1-8
pubmed: 35275886
BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3):
pubmed: 34189560
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):552-560
pubmed: 32432669
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Dec;22(12):2298-2314
pubmed: 33049103
JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):942-952
pubmed: 34319377
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Oct 5;:1-7
pubmed: 30286650
Am J Surg. 2022 Jul;224(1 Pt B):259-263
pubmed: 35131086
Ann Surg. 2019 Jun;269(6):1012-1015
pubmed: 31082895
BMJ. 2021 Dec 17;375:n3113
pubmed: 34921011
JAMA Surg. 2022 Feb 1;157(2):146-156
pubmed: 34878511