Simplified engineering geomorphic unit-based seismic site characterization of the detailed area plan of Dhaka city, Bangladesh.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 31 10 2022
accepted: 24 06 2023
medline: 11 7 2023
pubmed: 11 7 2023
entrez: 10 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Severe failure of improperly designed and poorly constructed structures may occur due to the amplified and prolonged ground motion during an earthquake, and hence prediction of the ground motion characteristics at the soil surface is crucial. In this study, based on the prepared simplified engineering geomorphic map, we performed a one-dimensional (1D) nonlinear site response analysis for seismic site characterization of the recently proposed Detailed Area Plan (DAP) area of Dhaka City, the Capital of Bangladesh. The engineering geomorphic unit-based map was prepared from image analysis and verified with the collected borehole data and surface geology map. The study area was classified into three major geomorphic units and seven sub-units subject to the subsurface soil profiles. Nine earthquake time histories, seven from the PEER NGA WEST2 data set and two synthetics, and seven identified subsurface soil profiles were used for nonlinear site response analysis, along with the BNBC 2020 uniform hazard spectrum as the target spectrum. For the selected earthquake ground motions, the near-surface soil response of the DAP area showed de-amplification of acceleration in the short period and amplification of acceleration in the long period. The amplified long-period acceleration could cause severe damage in inappropriately designed and poorly constructed long-period structures. The outcome of this study could be used to prepare a seismic risk-sensitive land use plan for the future development of the DAP of Dhaka City.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37429953
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37628-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-37628-6
pmc: PMC10333223
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

11151

Subventions

Organisme : Ministry of Science and Technology, Bangladesh
ID : GO: 39.00.0000.009.14.019.21-745 (SL. 358, Gr. SL. 358 ES

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Boccard, N. Analysis of trends in disaster risk. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 53, 101989 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101989
Steckler, M. S., Akhter, S. H. & Seeber, L. Collision of the Ganges–brahmaputra delta with the burma arc: Implications for earthquake hazard. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 273, 367–378 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.009
Rahman, M. Z. & Siddiqua, S. Evaluation of liquefaction-resistance of soils using standard penetration test, cone penetration test, and shear-wave velocity data for Dhaka, Chittagong, and Sylhet cities in Bangladesh. Environ. Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6533-9 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s12665-017-6533-9
Tamura, K. Seismic design of highway bridge foundations with the effects of liquefaction since the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Soils Found. 54, 874–882 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2014.06.017
Cruz-Atienza, V. M. et al. Long duration of ground motion in the paradigmatic valley of Mexico. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–9 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/srep38807
Ansal, A., Tönük, G. & Kurtuluş, A. Implications of site specific response analysis. In Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering in Europe: 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering-Thessaloniki 2018 (ed. Pitilakis, K.) 51–68 (Springer International Publishing, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75741-4_2 .
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75741-4_2
BSSC. NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. Build. Seism. Saf. Counc. I, 515 (2015).
USGS. M 7.8–67 km NNE of Bharatpur, Nepal. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us20002926/executive#executive (2015).
Rahman, M. Z., Siddiqua, S. & Kamal, A. S. M. M. Site response analysis for deep and soft sedimentary deposits of Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Nat. Hazards 106, 2279–2305 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-04543-w
Cramer, C. Site-specific seismic-hazard analysis that is completely probabilistic. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 1841–1846 (2003).
doi: 10.1785/0120020206
Bazzurro, P. & Cornell, C. A. Ground-motion amplification in nonlinear soil sites with uncertain properties. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 2090–2109 (2004).
doi: 10.1785/0120030215
Bazzurro, P. & Cornell, C. A. Nonlinear soil-site effects in probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 2110–2123 (2004).
doi: 10.1785/0120030216
Kaklamanos, J., Baise, L. G., Thompson, E. M. & Dorfmann, L. Comparison of 1D linear, equivalent-linear, and nonlinear site response models at six KiK-net validation sites. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 69, 207–219 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.10.016
Hashash, Y. M. A & Groholski, D. R. Recent advances in nonlinear site response analysis. In Fifth International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Soil Dynamics Symposium in Honor of Professor I.M. Idriss, Vol 29 1–22 (2010).
Stewart, J. P., Afshari, K. & Goulet, C. A. Non-ergodic site response in seismic hazard analysis. Earthq. Spectra 33, 1385–1414 (2017).
doi: 10.1193/081716eqs135m
Nguyen, V. Q., Aaqib, M., Nguyen, D. D., Luat, N. V. & Park, D. A site-specific response analysis: A case study in Hanoi, Vietnam. Appl. Sci. 10, 3972 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/app10113972
Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J. & Seed, H. B. Shake-91. In SHAKE: A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Sites (1972).
Hardin, B. O. & Drnevich, V. P. Shear modulus and damping in soils: Design equations and curves. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 98, 667–692 (1972).
doi: 10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001760
Arslan, H. & Siyahi, B. A comparative study on linear and nonlinear site response analysis. Environ. Geol. 50, 1193–1200 (2006).
doi: 10.1007/s00254-006-0291-4
Ordóñez, G. A. SHAKE2000 for the 1-D Analysis of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Problems 310 (Geomotions, LLC, Lacey, Washington, USA, 2012).
Idriss, I. M. & Sun, J. I. User’s Manual for SHAKE91: A Computer Program for Conducting Equivalent Linear Seismic Response Analyses of Horizontally Layered Soil Deposits (University of California Davis, 1992).
Schnabel, P. B. SHAKE: A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Sites (EERC Rep. 72-12, University of California, Berkeley, 1972).
Hashash, Y. M. A. DEEPSOIL 7.0 User Manual (2017).
Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H. & Fenves, G. L. OpenSees Command Language Manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (University of California, 2006).
Li, X., Wang, Z. L. & Shen, C. K. SUMDES: A Nonlinear Procedure for Response Analysis of Horizontally-layered Sites Subjected to Multidirectional Earthquake Loading (Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis, 1992).
Ansary, M. A. & Jahan, N. Site response and liquefaction susceptibility estimation of a site in northern part of Bangladesh. Environ. Earth Sci. 80, 1–18 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s12665-021-10079-w
Szmigiera, M. Cities with the highest population density globally 2021. Statista https://www.statista.com/statistics/1237290/cities-highest-population-density/ (2021).
Rahman, M. Z., Siddiqua, S. & Kamal, A. S. M. M. Seismic source modeling and probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bangladesh. Nat. Hazards 103, 2489–2532 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-04094-6
CDMP. Earthquake Risk Assessment for Dhaka, Chittagong and Sylhet (2009).
Seraj, T. M. & Islam, M. A. Detailed Area Plan: Proposals to Meet Housing Demand in Dhaka. Dhaka Metropolitan Development Area and Its Planning Problems, Issues, and Policies. 1–11 (2013).
Mowla, Q. A. Review of Dhaka Structure Plan 2016–2035 1–7 https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1065.8322 (2016).
Miller, B., Filatow, D., Dufresne, A., Geertsema, M. & Dinney, M. Engineering geomorphological mapping. In Encyclopedia of Engineering Geology (eds Bobrowsky, P. T. & Marker, B.) 278–292 (Springer, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73568-9_108 .
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73568-9_108
Kamal, A. S. M. M. & Midorikawa, S. GIS-based geomorphological mapping using remote sensing data and supplementary geoinformation: A case study of the Dhaka city area, Bangladesh. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 6, 111–125 (2004).
Rahman, M. Z., Siddiqua, S. & Kamal, A. S. M. M. Liquefaction hazard mapping by liquefaction potential index for Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Eng. Geol. 188, 137–147 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.012
Rahman, M. Z., Kamal, A. S. M. M. & Siddiqua, S. Near-surface shear wave velocity estimation and V s30 mapping for Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Nat. Hazards 92, 1687–1715 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s11069-018-3266-3
BNBC. Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC) 2020. Ministry of Housing and Public Works (2020).
Karim, M. F. & Rahman, M. Z. Possible effect of moderate earthquake on existing infrastructures of Dhaka city: A geological-geotechnical overview, Bangladesh. J. Sci. Technol. 4, 193–203 (2002).
Al., A., Alam, M. K., Shahidul Hasan, A. K. M., Khan, M. R., Whitney, J. W., Abdullah, S. K. M., Queen, J. E., Geological Survey (U.S.). & Office of Scientific Publications, G. S. of B. Geological map of Bangladesh. Geological Survey of Bangladesh (1989).
Ambraseys, N. N. & Douglas, J. Magnitude calibration of north Indian earthquakes. Geophys. J. Int. 159, 165–206 (2004).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02323.x
Szeliga, W., Hough, S., Martin, S. & Bilham, R. Intensity, magnitude, location, and attenuation in India for felt earthquakes since 1762. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100, 570–584 (2010).
doi: 10.1785/0120080329
Atik, L. A. & Abrahamson, N. An improved method for nonstationary spectral matching. Earthq. Spectra 26, 601–617 (2010).
doi: 10.1193/1.3459159
Curray, J. R. & Moore, D. G. Sedimentary and tectonic processes in the Bengal deep-sea fan and geosyncline. In The Geology of Continental Margins (eds Burk, C. A. & Drake, C. L.) 617–627 (Springer, 1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01141-6_45 .
doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-01141-6_45
Steckler, M. S. et al. Locked and loading megathrust linked to active subduction beneath the Indo-Burman Ranges. Nat. Geosci. 9, 615–618 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/ngeo2760
Wang, Y., Sieh, K., Tun, S. T., Lai, K.-Y. & Myint, T. Active tectonics and earthquake potential of the Myanmar region. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 119, 3767–3822 (2014).
doi: 10.1002/2013JB010762
Bilham, R. & Hough, S. Future earthquakes on the Indian subcontinent : Inevitable hazard, preventable risk. South Asian J. 12, 1–9 (2006).
Oldham, R. D. Report on the great earthquake of 12th June 1897. Mem. Geol. Surv. India 29, 1–379 (1899).
Yeats, R. S. et al. The Geology of Earthquakes (Oxford University Press, 1997).
Morino, M. et al. A paleo-seismological study of the Dauki fault at Jaflong, Sylhet, Bangladesh: Historical seismic events and an attempted rupture segmentation model. J. Asian Earth Sci. 91, 218–226 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.06.002
Singh, A. P., Mishra, O. P. & Singh, O. P. Seismic evidence of pop-up tectonics beneath the Shillong Plateau area of Northeast India. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–12 (2022).
Vorobieva, I., Gorshkov, A. & Mandal, P. Modelling the seismic potential of the Indo-Burman megathrust. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00586-y (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00586-y pubmed: 34707146 pmcid: 8551320
Borcherdt, R. D. Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design. Earthq. Spectra 10, 617–653 (1994).
doi: 10.1193/1.1585791
Dobry, R. et al. New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code provisions. Earthq. Spectra 16, 41–67 (2000).
doi: 10.1193/1.1586082
Andrus, R. D. & Stokoe, K. H. II. Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126, 1015–1025 (2000).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015)
Youd, T. L. & Idriss, I. M. Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127, 297–313 (2001).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297)
Boore, D. M. & Brown, L. T. Comparing shear-wave velocity profiles from inversion of surface-wave phase velocities with downhole measurements: Systematic differences between the CXW method and downhole measurements at six USC strong-motion sites. Seismol. Res. Lett. 69, 222–229 (1998).
doi: 10.1785/gssrl.69.3.222
Rathje, E. M., Kottke, A. R. & Trent, W. L. Influence of input motion and site property variabilities on seismic site response analysis. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136, 607–619 (2010).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000255
Darendeli, M. B. Development of a New Family of Normalized Modulus Reduction and Material Damping Curves (The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, 2001).
Zhang, J., Andrus, R. & Juang, C. H. Model uncertainty in normalized shear modulus and damping relationships. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134, 24–36 (2008).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:1(24)
Zefeng, Y., Jiao, Y., Junwei, L. & Bo, H. Shear modulus degradation curves of gravelly and clayey soils based on KiK-net in situ seismic observations. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143, 6017008 (2017).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001738
Melnikov, R., Zazulya, J., Stepanov, M., Ashikhmin, O. & Maltseva, T. OCR and POP parameters in plaxis-based numerical analysis of loaded over consolidated soils. Procedia Eng. 165, 845–852 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.783
Tien, H. W. Soil Strength Properties and Their Measurement. In Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation 319–336 (Transportation Research Board, 1996).
Tsai, C.-C. & Chen, C.-W. Comparison study of one-dimensional site response analysis methods. Earthq. Spectra 32, 1075–1095 (2016).
doi: 10.1193/071514eqs110m
Matasović, N. & Vucetic, M. Cyclic characterization of liquefiable sands. J. Geotech. Eng. 119, 4279 (1993).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:11(1805)
Groholski, D. R., Hashash, Y. M. A., Musgrove, M., Harmon, J. & Kim, B. Evaluation of 1-D nonlinear site response analysis using a general quadratic/hyperbolic strength-controlled constitutive model. In 6ICEGE: 6th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (2015).
Groholski, D. et al. Simplified model for small-strain nonlinearity and strength in 1D seismic site response analysis. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142, 4016042 (2016).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001496
Hack, H. Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope. In Encyclopedia of Engineering Geology, Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series (eds. Bobrowsky, P.T. & Marker, B.) 667–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73568-9_207 (Springer, Cham, 2018).
Kondner, R. L. & Zelasko, J. A hyperbolic stress-strain formulation for sands. In Proceedings of the Second Panamerican Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Brazil, 1963 Vol. 1 289–324 (1963).
Phillips, C. & Hashash, Y. M. A. Damping formulation for nonlinear 1D site response analyses. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 29, 1143–1158 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.01.004
Numanoglu, O. A., Musgrove, M., Harmon, J. A. & Hashash, Y. M. A. Generalized non-masing hysteresis model for cyclic loading. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144, 1–6 (2018).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001816
Bajaj, K. & Anbazhagan, P. Site amplification factors and acceleration response spectra for shallow bedrock sites-application to southern India. J. Earthq. Eng. 26, 2103–2123 (2022).
doi: 10.1080/13632469.2020.1754308
Tran, N. L. et al. Evaluation of seismic site amplification using 1D site response analyses at Ba Dinh square area, Vietnam. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021, 1–11 (2021).
Khatun, M., Ali, R. M. E., Karim, S. & Munsura Akther, K. Geomorphology and geology of the Dhaka city corporation area-an approach of remote sensing and GIS technique. Int. J. Astron. 6, 7–16 (2019).
Ishihara, K. Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (AA Balkema Publishers, 1985).
Iwasaki, T. et al. Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods. in Third International Earthquake Microzonation Conference Proceedings 1319–1330 (1982).
Hashash, Y. M. A. & Park, D. Nonlinear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment. Eng. Geol. 62, 185–206 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00061-8

Auteurs

Md Shakhawat Hossain (MS)

Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. shakhawat.dsm@du.ac.bd.
Department of Disaster Science and Climate Resilience, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh. shakhawat.dsm@du.ac.bd.

Muneyoshi Numada (M)

Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. numa@iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Momtahina Mitu (M)

Department of Coastal Studies and Disaster Management, University of Barisal, Barisal, Bangladesh.

Kishor Timsina (K)

Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Chaitaniya Krisna (C)

Department of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Md Zillur Rahman (MZ)

Department of Disaster Science and Climate Resilience, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

A S M Maksud Kamal (ASMM)

Department of Disaster Science and Climate Resilience, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Kimiro Meguro (K)

Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH