Effect of chemical disinfection on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl ether siloxane impression material: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Chemical disinfection
Glutaraldehyde
Hybrid elastomeric impression material
PVES
Sodium hypochlorite
Vinyl polyether siloxane
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 07 2023
10 07 2023
Historique:
received:
13
05
2023
accepted:
22
06
2023
medline:
12
7
2023
pubmed:
11
7
2023
entrez:
10
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Polyvinyl ether siloxane (PVES) possesses ideal characteristics for making precise and accurate dental impressions. PVES dimensional stability owes to its better polymeric properties derived from its parent materials poly ethers and polyvinyl siloxanes. As recommended use of chemical disinfecting agents is getting more popular, there is a growing concern associated with the effect of disinfectants on PVES dimensional stability. This study was aimed to understand the PVES behavior when subjected to chemical disinfectants. The data was collected from research studies retrieved from Google Scholar, Scopus, and PubMed using MeSH terms of keywords "vinyl polyether siloxane AND Disinfection" or (Vinyl polyether siloxane OR polyvinyl siloxane ether OR PVES) AND (disinfectant OR disinfection)" without any restriction to publication date. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis) directions were observed during the data collection, screening of studies, and meta-analysis. The primary data were retrieved, and batch exported from databases using Harzing's Publish or Perish software; primary analysis was performed in Microsoft Excel, while statistical analysis for effect size, two-tailed p-values, and heterogeneity among studies was performed using Meta Essentials. The effect size was calculated using Hedge's g values at the 95% confidence level using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity among studies was measured using the Cochrane Q and I Dental impressions made from the PVES elastomeric impression materials showed no significant changes in dimensional stability. Immersion in the chemical disinfectant for 10 min was associated with clinically irrelevant changes in the dimensions of the PVES impressions. Disinfection with sodium hypochlorite was associated with clinically significant changes in dimensions, with a two-tailed p-value of 0.049. Disinfection with 2-2.5% glutaraldehyde solution was not associated with any significant dimensional variability.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Polyvinyl ether siloxane (PVES) possesses ideal characteristics for making precise and accurate dental impressions. PVES dimensional stability owes to its better polymeric properties derived from its parent materials poly ethers and polyvinyl siloxanes. As recommended use of chemical disinfecting agents is getting more popular, there is a growing concern associated with the effect of disinfectants on PVES dimensional stability. This study was aimed to understand the PVES behavior when subjected to chemical disinfectants.
MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY
The data was collected from research studies retrieved from Google Scholar, Scopus, and PubMed using MeSH terms of keywords "vinyl polyether siloxane AND Disinfection" or (Vinyl polyether siloxane OR polyvinyl siloxane ether OR PVES) AND (disinfectant OR disinfection)" without any restriction to publication date. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis) directions were observed during the data collection, screening of studies, and meta-analysis. The primary data were retrieved, and batch exported from databases using Harzing's Publish or Perish software; primary analysis was performed in Microsoft Excel, while statistical analysis for effect size, two-tailed p-values, and heterogeneity among studies was performed using Meta Essentials. The effect size was calculated using Hedge's g values at the 95% confidence level using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity among studies was measured using the Cochrane Q and I
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION
Dental impressions made from the PVES elastomeric impression materials showed no significant changes in dimensional stability. Immersion in the chemical disinfectant for 10 min was associated with clinically irrelevant changes in the dimensions of the PVES impressions. Disinfection with sodium hypochlorite was associated with clinically significant changes in dimensions, with a two-tailed p-value of 0.049. Disinfection with 2-2.5% glutaraldehyde solution was not associated with any significant dimensional variability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37430254
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03168-8
pii: 10.1186/s12903-023-03168-8
pmc: PMC10331969
doi:
Substances chimiques
Disinfectants
0
Ether
0F5N573A2Y
Ethers
0
Ethyl Ethers
0
Polyvinyls
0
Siloxanes
0
vinyl polysiloxane
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
471Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sep 5;22(1):379
pubmed: 36064393
J Prosthodont. 2021 Apr;30(4):345-350
pubmed: 32875682
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 28;10:e12812
pubmed: 35174015
Saudi Dent J. 2020 May;32(4):161-170
pubmed: 32405219
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 31;15(7):
pubmed: 35407884
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021 Jan 13;35(1):161-169
pubmed: 33435664
Niger J Clin Pract. 2022 Sep;25(9):1484-1489
pubmed: 36149208
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Mar;109(3):172-8
pubmed: 23522366
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;9(3):
pubmed: 35324812
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2018 Jan;39(1):e17-e20
pubmed: 29293017
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Jun;9(3):182-187
pubmed: 28680549
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Jun 27;15(1):224
pubmed: 35761301
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020 Feb 13;12:25-30
pubmed: 32104101
J Dent. 2008 Jun;36(6):456-61
pubmed: 18433976
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e849-e856
pubmed: 28422353
Contemp Clin Dent. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):10-14
pubmed: 33110302
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Sep 17;23(18):
pubmed: 36142778
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):537-553
pubmed: 28801932
Dent Mater J. 2018 Jul 29;37(4):675-684
pubmed: 29848853
J Prosthodont. 2015 Aug;24(6):494-8
pubmed: 25522249