Status of household dietary diversity and associated factors among rural and urban households of Northern Uganda.
Attitude
Dietary diversity
Gulu district
Knowledge
Rural
Urban
Journal
BMC nutrition
ISSN: 2055-0928
Titre abrégé: BMC Nutr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672434
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jul 2023
10 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
15
09
2022
accepted:
27
06
2023
medline:
11
7
2023
pubmed:
11
7
2023
entrez:
10
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In Northern Uganda, 21 and 52.4% of children under five are underweight and stunted, respectively while 32.9% of pregnant women are anemic. This demographic situation suggests among other issues, a lack of dietary diversity among households. Good nutrition practices that confer dietary quality such as dietary diversity are known to depend on nutrition knowledge and attitude and are shaped by sociodemographic and cultural factors. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence to support this assertion for the variably malnourished population of Northern Uganda. A cross-sectional nutrition survey was conducted among 364 household caregivers (182 from two locations in Northern Uganda; Gulu District (the rural) and Gulu City (the urban), selected through a multistage sampling approach. The aim was to determine the status of dietary diversity and its associated factors between rural and urban households of Northern Uganda. The household dietary diversity questionnaire and the food frequency questionnaire on a 7-day reference period were used to collect data on household dietary diversity whereas multiple choice questions and the five points Likert Scale were used to determine knowledge and attitude toward dietary diversity. Consumption of ≤ 5 food groups were regarded as low in dietary diversity, 6-8 food groups as medium and ≥ 9 as high dietary diversity score using the FAO 12 food groups. An Independent two-sample t-test was used to differentiate the status of dietary diversity between the urban and rural areas. The Pearson Chi-square Test was used to determine the status of knowledge and attitude while Poisson regression was used to predict dietary diversity based on caregivers' nutritional knowledge and attitude and their associated factors. The 7-day dietary recall period revealed that dietary diversity was 22% higher in urban (Gulu City) than in the rural area (Gulu District) with rural and urban households achieving medium (score of 8.76 ± 1.37) and high (score of 9.57 ± 1.44) dietary diversity status, respectively. Diets in both locations were dominated by starchy cereals and tubers while animal-source foods and fruits and vegetables were the least consumed. A higher proportion (51.65%) of urban respondents had good nutrition knowledge toward dietary diversity compared to their rural counterparts (23.08%) and a significantly higher proportion (87.91%) of the former exhibited positive attitude towards dietary diversity than the rural counterparts (72.53%). Application of the Poisson regression shows that nutritional knowledge was a positive predictor of dietary diversity in the rural (β = 0.114; ρ = 0.000) than in the urban areas (β = -0.008; ρ = 0.551). Caregivers attitude had no significant effect across locations. In terms of associated factors, marital status is a positive predictor of dietary diversity in the urban (β = 1.700; ρ = 0.001) than the other location (β = -2.541; ρ = 0.008). Whereas education level of household caregiver and household food expenditure show negative effects across the two locations, the educational level of the household head is an outlier as it positively predicted dietary diversity in the rural (β = 0.003; ρ = 0.002) when compared to urban area (β = -0.002; ρ = -0.011). Rural households in Northern Uganda have medium-level dietary diversity with urban households having high dietary diversity. Diets in both locations are dominated by starchy cereals and roots and tubers. The urban-rural food divide can be harmonized through nutrition education and outreach, specifically focusing on the FAO 12 food groups. Attitude toward consumption of fruits and vegetables which are seasonally abundant would improve dietary diversity and nutritional outcomes in the study area.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In Northern Uganda, 21 and 52.4% of children under five are underweight and stunted, respectively while 32.9% of pregnant women are anemic. This demographic situation suggests among other issues, a lack of dietary diversity among households. Good nutrition practices that confer dietary quality such as dietary diversity are known to depend on nutrition knowledge and attitude and are shaped by sociodemographic and cultural factors. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence to support this assertion for the variably malnourished population of Northern Uganda.
METHODS
METHODS
A cross-sectional nutrition survey was conducted among 364 household caregivers (182 from two locations in Northern Uganda; Gulu District (the rural) and Gulu City (the urban), selected through a multistage sampling approach. The aim was to determine the status of dietary diversity and its associated factors between rural and urban households of Northern Uganda. The household dietary diversity questionnaire and the food frequency questionnaire on a 7-day reference period were used to collect data on household dietary diversity whereas multiple choice questions and the five points Likert Scale were used to determine knowledge and attitude toward dietary diversity. Consumption of ≤ 5 food groups were regarded as low in dietary diversity, 6-8 food groups as medium and ≥ 9 as high dietary diversity score using the FAO 12 food groups. An Independent two-sample t-test was used to differentiate the status of dietary diversity between the urban and rural areas. The Pearson Chi-square Test was used to determine the status of knowledge and attitude while Poisson regression was used to predict dietary diversity based on caregivers' nutritional knowledge and attitude and their associated factors.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The 7-day dietary recall period revealed that dietary diversity was 22% higher in urban (Gulu City) than in the rural area (Gulu District) with rural and urban households achieving medium (score of 8.76 ± 1.37) and high (score of 9.57 ± 1.44) dietary diversity status, respectively. Diets in both locations were dominated by starchy cereals and tubers while animal-source foods and fruits and vegetables were the least consumed. A higher proportion (51.65%) of urban respondents had good nutrition knowledge toward dietary diversity compared to their rural counterparts (23.08%) and a significantly higher proportion (87.91%) of the former exhibited positive attitude towards dietary diversity than the rural counterparts (72.53%). Application of the Poisson regression shows that nutritional knowledge was a positive predictor of dietary diversity in the rural (β = 0.114; ρ = 0.000) than in the urban areas (β = -0.008; ρ = 0.551). Caregivers attitude had no significant effect across locations. In terms of associated factors, marital status is a positive predictor of dietary diversity in the urban (β = 1.700; ρ = 0.001) than the other location (β = -2.541; ρ = 0.008). Whereas education level of household caregiver and household food expenditure show negative effects across the two locations, the educational level of the household head is an outlier as it positively predicted dietary diversity in the rural (β = 0.003; ρ = 0.002) when compared to urban area (β = -0.002; ρ = -0.011).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Rural households in Northern Uganda have medium-level dietary diversity with urban households having high dietary diversity. Diets in both locations are dominated by starchy cereals and roots and tubers. The urban-rural food divide can be harmonized through nutrition education and outreach, specifically focusing on the FAO 12 food groups. Attitude toward consumption of fruits and vegetables which are seasonally abundant would improve dietary diversity and nutritional outcomes in the study area.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37430346
doi: 10.1186/s40795-023-00739-4
pii: 10.1186/s40795-023-00739-4
pmc: PMC10332000
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
83Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Health Popul Nutr. 2014 Jun;32(2):237-48
pubmed: 25076661
Br J Nutr. 2016 Jan 28;115(2):351-60
pubmed: 26560016
Agric Econ. 2020 Jan;51(1):47-58
pubmed: 32322130
Asian J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;1(2):93-100
pubmed: 22375196
BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 16;13:960
pubmed: 24131558
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 12;12(12):e0189022
pubmed: 29232413
Food Sci Nutr. 2018 Oct 25;6(8):2374-2385
pubmed: 30510738
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Apr;115(4):551-8
pubmed: 25441956
Nutrients. 2019 Apr 12;11(4):
pubmed: 31013852
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Jan 9;17(1):6
pubmed: 28068965
BMC Nutr. 2017 Mar 21;3:28
pubmed: 32153810
Pan Afr Med J. 2011;10:47
pubmed: 22384293
Clin Nutr Res. 2017 Oct;6(4):247-255
pubmed: 29124045
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Jul 1;170(1):104-11
pubmed: 19451177
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999 Apr;53(4):298-308
pubmed: 10334656
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Apr;21(5):902-911
pubmed: 29248030
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 3;17(1):621
pubmed: 28673263
Food Nutr Bull. 2016 Jun;37(2):202-18
pubmed: 26916113
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002;11 Suppl 3:S579-85
pubmed: 12492651
Appetite. 2003 Feb;40(1):25-41
pubmed: 12631502
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7204562
pubmed: 28497063
J Nutr Metab. 2013;2013:572132
pubmed: 23762543
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Apr 11;16:76
pubmed: 27067390
Nutr Res Pract. 2014 Jun;8(3):304-11
pubmed: 24944776
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2003;916:i-viii, 1-149, backcover
pubmed: 12768890
Food Sci Nutr. 2018 Oct 25;6(8):2273-2284
pubmed: 30510727
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017 Mar;26(2):317-325
pubmed: 28244712
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Apr;20(5):832-847
pubmed: 27894381
Iran J Public Health. 2018 Jul;47(7):958-966
pubmed: 30181993
J Nutr. 2004 Oct;134(10):2579-85
pubmed: 15465751
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Apr;36(2):449-57
pubmed: 17242024
Br J Nutr. 1999 Mar;81(3):181-9
pubmed: 10434844
Public Health Nutr. 2003 Apr;6(2):217-23
pubmed: 12675965
BMC Nutr. 2021 Nov 9;7(1):68
pubmed: 34749820
Afr Health Sci. 2008 Dec;8(4):244-52
pubmed: 20589132
Food Res Int. 2018 Feb;104:86-99
pubmed: 29433787
J Hum Hypertens. 2016 Oct;30(10):581-90
pubmed: 27121443
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 12;17(1):440
pubmed: 28499361
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 10;15:880
pubmed: 26357958
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017 Apr 27;13(1):23
pubmed: 28449682
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Aug 29;5:469
pubmed: 22931957
BMC Public Health. 2004 Dec 02;4:58
pubmed: 15575953
Arch Public Health. 2019 Feb 07;77:4
pubmed: 30774951