Impact of Different Storage Temperature on the Enzymatic Activity of
antioxidant enzymes
enzymatic activity
freshness markers
royal jelly
storage
Journal
Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Oct 2022
11 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
08
09
2022
revised:
06
10
2022
accepted:
07
10
2022
medline:
11
7
2023
pubmed:
11
7
2023
entrez:
11
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Royal Jelly is a nutrient secretion of nurse bees and a high interest functional food in human nutrition. Very little information is available on its chemical composition integrity and enzymatic activity during shelf life and assessment of new freshness markers are desirable for its conservation. In this study, the activity of glucose oxidase, five proteases and two antioxidant enzymes in refrigerated and frozen Royal Jelly for different storage times was preliminary investigated. Refrigeration determined a significantly reduction in glucose oxidase and carboxypeptidase A-like activity in Royal Jelly after one year of storage while no differences were recorded in the activity of these enzymes in frozen samples. After one year of storage glucose oxidase and carboxypeptidase A-like activity resulted higher in frozen samples frozen than in refrigerate ones. Results obtained suggest that the activities of these enzymes may be good markers of Royal Jelly freshness within 1 year at refrigeration condition. Freezing could be a valid alternative storage method to ensure a higher preservation of glucose oxidase and carboxypeptidase A-like activities for at least 1 year. Further investigation to determine the timing of glucose oxidase inactivation/degradation under refrigerated conditions and the enzymatic activity trend under prolonged frozen conditions are desirable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37430913
pii: foods11203165
doi: 10.3390/foods11203165
pmc: PMC9601880
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : CONAPI
ID : CUPs J52E20000080007 & J58H19000520007
Références
Electrophoresis. 2006 Oct;27(20):3935-8
pubmed: 17054096
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jan 08;21(2):
pubmed: 31936187
J Proteome Res. 2008 Aug;7(8):3339-53
pubmed: 18597515
Dose Response. 2012;10(1):1-10
pubmed: 22423225
J Agric Food Chem. 2021 Sep 15;69(36):10731-10740
pubmed: 34469689
Anal Biochem. 1973 May;53(1):208-22
pubmed: 4145739
Microbiol Res. 2016 Nov;192:130-141
pubmed: 27664731
Food Chem. 2019 Jun 1;282:76-83
pubmed: 30711108
BMC Genomics. 2014 Aug 08;15:665
pubmed: 25103401
J Proteome Res. 2013 Jan 4;12(1):404-11
pubmed: 23157659
J Agric Food Chem. 2015 Apr 29;63(16):4190-5
pubmed: 25858076
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005 Jan;35(1):85-91
pubmed: 15607658
J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Jan 14;52(1):15-20
pubmed: 14709007
Electrophoresis. 2018 Aug;39(16):2160-2167
pubmed: 29761912
J Proteomics. 2012 Sep 18;75(17):5327-41
pubmed: 22728600
J Proteome Res. 2010 Dec 3;9(12):6578-94
pubmed: 20882974
J Biol Chem. 1974 Nov 25;249(22):7130-9
pubmed: 4436300
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jul 04;18(7):
pubmed: 28677627
J Biochem. 1996 Feb;119(2):291-5
pubmed: 8882720
Mutat Res. 2001 Oct 1;482(1-2):21-6
pubmed: 11535245
BMC Genomics. 2009 Dec 31;10:645
pubmed: 20043834
Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
pubmed: 942051
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jun 29;9:860
pubmed: 30008725
Curr Protoc Toxicol. 2011 Aug;Chapter 7:Unit7.10
pubmed: 21818753
Naturwissenschaften. 2014 Aug;101(8):661-70
pubmed: 24969731
J Agric Food Chem. 2002 May 8;50(10):2825-9
pubmed: 11982406
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2001 Feb;65(2):277-84
pubmed: 11302159
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:1259510
pubmed: 28814983
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007 Oct;389(4):1087-93
pubmed: 17673985
Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959 Dec;37:1393-9
pubmed: 14405350
J Proteome Res. 2010 May 7;9(5):2207-15
pubmed: 20307072
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2022 Mar;106(2):387-394
pubmed: 34288168
Proteomics. 2005 Feb;5(3):769-76
pubmed: 15693061
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1963 May 7;73:57-70
pubmed: 14000328
J Biol Chem. 1963 Dec;238:3884-94
pubmed: 14086721