"In Vitro" Evaluation of Energy-Based Sealing of Graft Side Branches in Bypass Surgery.
Journal
World journal of surgery
ISSN: 1432-2323
Titre abrégé: World J Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7704052
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
accepted:
19
06
2023
pubmed:
11
7
2023
medline:
11
7
2023
entrez:
11
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Our objective was to compare the in vitro efficacy of electrothermal bipolar [EB] vessel sealing and ultrasonic harmonic scalpel [HS] versus mechanical interruption, with conventional ties or surgical clips (SC), in sealing saphenous vein (SV) collaterals, during its eventual preparation for bypass surgery. Experimental in vitro study on 30 segments of SV. Each fragment included two collaterals at least 2 mm in diameter. One of them was sealed by ligation with 3/0 silk ties (control) and the other one with EB (n = 10), HS (n = 10) or medium-6 mm SC (n = 10). After incorporation in a closed circuit with pulsatile flow, the pressure was progressively increased until causing rupture. Collateral diameter, burst pressure, leak point, and histological study were recorded. Burst pressure was higher for SC (1320.20 ± 373.847 mmHg) as compared with EB (942.2 ± 344.9 mmHg, p = 0.065), and especially with HS (637.00 ± 320.61 mmHg, p = 0.0001). No statistically significant difference between EB and HS was found, and bursting always happened at supraphysiological pressures. The leak point for HS was always detected in the sealing zone (10/10), while for EB and SC, it occurred in the sealing zone only in 6/10(60%) and 4/10(40%), respectively (p = 0.015). Energy delivery devices showed similar efficacy and safety in sealing of SV side branches. Although bursting pressure was lower than with tie ligature or SC, non-inferiority efficacy was shown at the range of physiological pressures in both, EB and HS. Due to their speed and easy handling, they may be useful in the preparation of the venous graft during revascularization surgery. However, remaining questions about healing process, potential spread of tissue damage and sealing durability, will require further analysis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37432421
doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07107-0
pii: 10.1007/s00268-023-07107-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2888-2896Subventions
Organisme : Instituto de Salud Carlos III
ID : PI20/01171
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie.
Références
Rajbabu K, Barber NJ, Choi W et al (2007) To knot or not to knot? Sutureless haemostasis compared to the surgeon’s knot. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(4):359–362
pubmed: 17535611
pmcid: 1963577
doi: 10.1308/003588407X183418
Lacin T, Batirel HF, Ozer K et al (2007) Safety of a thermal vessel sealer on main pulmonary vessels. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 31(3):482–485
pubmed: 17239609
doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.11.038
Toishi M, Yoshida K, Agatsuma H et al (2014) Usefulness of vessel-sealing devices for ≤ 7 mm diameter vessels: a randomized controlled trial for human thoracoscopic lobectomy in primary lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 19(3):448–455
pubmed: 24893872
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu176
Clements RH, Palepu R (2007) In vivo comparison of the coagulation capability of SonoSurg and Harmonic Ace on 4 mm and 5 mm arteries. Surg Endosc 21(12):2203–2206
pubmed: 17479325
doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9345-2
Hutchens TC, Giglio NC, Cilip CM et al (2020) Novel optical linear beam shaping designs for use in laparoscopic laser sealing of vascular tissues. Ann Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2020:5049–5052
Tsunezuka Y, Waseda R, Yachi T (2010) Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device LigaSureV for pulmonary artery ligation–burst pressure and clinical experiences in complete video-assisted thoracoscopic major lung resection for lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 11(3):229–233
pubmed: 20558548
doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.239087
Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Fukunaga M (2010) Comparison of two different energy-based vascular sealing systems for the hemostasis of various types of arteries: a porcine model-evaluation of LigaSure ForceTriad. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 20(9):747–751
doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0438
Elhao M, Abdallah K, Serag I et al (2009) Efficacy of using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in patients with different degrees of operative difficulty: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 147(1):86–90
pubmed: 19729238
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.07.011
Lesser TG, Wolfram F, Boltze C (2013) Sealing of pulmonary arteries with LigaSure: in vivo and ex vivo examinations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145(6):1525–1528
pubmed: 23228409
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.009
Martin ST, Heeney A, Pierce C et al (2011) Use of an electrothermal bipolar sealing device in ligation of major mesenteric vessels during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Techn Coloproctol 15(3):285–289
doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0707-3
Falcón-Espínola M, Requejo-García L, Plana-Andani E et al (2019) In vitro model to assess energy devices for the sealing of saphenous vein collaterals in revascularization surgery. Angiologia 71(1):2–10
Narloch JA, Brandstater ME (1995) Influence of breathing technique on arterial blood pressure during heavy weight lifting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76(5):457–462
pubmed: 7741618
doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80578-8
Wallwiener CW, Junginger SH, Zubke W et al (2014) Bipolar vessel sealing: instrument contamination and wear have little effect on seal quality and success in a porcine in vitro model. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 399(7):863–871
doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1234-2
Lamberton GR, Hsi RS, Jin DH et al (2008) Prospective comparison of four laparoscopic vessel ligation devices. J Endourol 22(10):2307–2312
pubmed: 18831673
doi: 10.1089/end.2008.9715
Leonardo C, Guaglianone S, De Carli P et al (2005) Laparoscopic nephrectomy using Ligasure system: preliminary experience. J Endourol 19(8):976–978
pubmed: 16253062
doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.976
Ding Z, Wable M, Rane A (2005) Use of Ligasure bipolar diathermy system in vaginal hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol J Inst Obstet Gynaecol 25(1):49–51
doi: 10.1080/01443610400024609
Demirturk F, Aytan H, Caliskan AC (2007) Comparison of the use of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer with harmonic scalpel in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 33(3):341–345
pubmed: 17578364
doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00533.x
Luo Y, Li X, Dong J et al (2017) A comparison of surgical outcomes and complications between hemostatic devices for thyroid surgery: a network meta-analysis. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Offic J Eur Fed Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Soc 274(3):1269–1278
doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4190-3
Richter S, Kollmar O, Schilling MK et al (2006) Efficacy and quality of vessel sealing: comparison of a reusable with a disposable device and effects of clamp surface geometry and structure. Surg Endosc 20(6):890–894
pubmed: 16738977
doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0380-6
Giusto G, Gandini M (2020) Ex vivo comparison of sliding knot ligatures vs haemostatic clips for equine small intestinal mesenteric vessel occlusion. BMC Vet Res 16(1):290
pubmed: 32787840
pmcid: 7424996
doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02498-x
Landman J, Kerbl K, Rehman J et al (2003) Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. J Urol 169(2):697–700
pubmed: 12544345
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)63995-X
Hruby GW, Marruffo FC, Durak E et al (2007) Evaluation of surgical energy devices for vessel sealing and peripheral energy spread in a porcine model. J Urol 178(6):2689–2693
pubmed: 17945280
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.121
Harold KL, Pollinger H, Matthews BD et al (2003) Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc 17(8):1228–1230
pubmed: 12799888
doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8833-7
Phillips CK, Hruby GW, Durak E et al (2008) Tissue response to surgical energy devices. Urology 71(4):744–748
pubmed: 18289646
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.035
Kim FJ, Chammas MF Jr, Gewehr E et al (2008) Temperature safety profile of laparoscopic devices: harmonic ACE (ACE), ligasure V (LV), and plasma trisector (PT). Surg Endosc 22(6):1464–1469
pubmed: 18027042
doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9650-9
Carpino PA, Khabbaz KR, Bojar RM et al (2000) Clinical benefits of endoscopic vein harvesting in patients with risk factors for saphenectomy wound infections undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119(1):69–75
pubmed: 10612763
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70219-4
Nwaejike N, Glizevskaja J, Nair J (2020) Radial artery harvesting for total arterial revascularization multimedia manual of cardiothoracic surgery. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1510/mmcts.2020.042
doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2020.042
pubmed: 32633905
Vecherskii II, Zatolokin VV, Petlin KA et al (2017) A new method of endoscopic harvesting of the great saphenous vein in an open system. Angiologiia i sosudistaia khirurgiia Angiol Vasc Surg. 23(2):131–136
Van Linden A, Hecker F, Lehmann-Grube J et al (2020) Randomized trial of 2 endoscopic radial artery harvesting devices-immunofluorescence assessment. Annal Thorac Surg. 110(3):897–902
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.063
Kronick M, Liem TK, Jung E et al (2019) Experienced operators achieve superior patency and wound complication rates with endoscopic great saphenous vein harvest compared with open harvest in lower extremity bypasses. J Vasc Surg 70(5):1534–1542
pubmed: 31153700
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.043
Khan SZ, Rivero M, McCraith B et al (2016) Endoscopic vein harvest does not negatively affect patency of great saphenous vein lower extremity bypass. J Vasc Surg 63(6):1546–1554
pubmed: 27005753
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.032
Jauhari YA, Hughes CO, Black SA et al (2014) Endoscopic vein harvesting in lower extremity arterial bypass: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 47(6):621–639
pubmed: 24642296
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.02.009
Wartman SM, Woo K, Herscu G et al (2013) Endoscopic vein harvest for infrainguinal arterial bypass. J Vasc Surg 57(6):1489–1494
pubmed: 23490296
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.029
Santo VJ, Dargon PT, Azarbal AF et al (2014) Open versus endoscopic great saphenous vein harvest for lower extremity revascularization of critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 59(2):427–434
pubmed: 24103407
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.007
Hayashi I, Kashima I, Yoshikawa E (2020) Use of the no-touch saphenous vein harvesting technique via small incisions. Innovations (Phila) 15(1):81–84
pubmed: 31875752
doi: 10.1177/1556984519886549
Ishizawa A, Hamasaki A, Uchida T et al (2019) Novel harvesting technique of no-touch saphenous vein graft using THUNDERBEAT. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 67(7):650–652
pubmed: 30820913
doi: 10.1007/s11748-019-01097-4
Burton HE, Williams RL, Espino DM (2017) Effects of freezing, fixation and dehydration on surface roughness properties of porcine left anterior descending coronary arteries. Micron 101:78–86
pubmed: 28662414
doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2017.06.009
Cooper IS, Samra K, Wisniewska K (1971) Effects of freezing on major arteries. Stroke 2:471–482
pubmed: 5111584
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.2.5.471
O’Leary SA, Doyle BJ, McGloughlin TM (2014) The impact of long term freezing on the mechanical properties of porcine aortic tissue. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 37:165–173
pubmed: 24922621
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.04.015
Kramer EA, Cezo JD, Fankell DP et al (2016) Strength and persistence of energy-based vessel seals rely on tissue water and glycosaminoglycan content. Ann Biomed Eng 44(11):3421–3431
pubmed: 27225992
doi: 10.1007/s10439-016-1657-8
Diamantis T, Kontos M, Arvelakis A et al (2006) Comparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, ultracision, and ligasure. Surg Today 36:908–913
pubmed: 16998685
doi: 10.1007/s00595-006-3254-1
Gardeweg S, Bockstahler B, Dupre G (2019) Effect of multiple use and sterilization on sealing performance of bipolar vessel sealing devices. PLoS ONE 14(8):e0221488
pubmed: 31430327
pmcid: 6701801
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221488