From root to shoot: quantifying nematode tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana by high-throughput phenotyping of plant development.
Arabidopsis thaliana
Heterodera schachtii
Meloidogyne incognita
biotic stress
growth rate analysis
high-throughput phenotyping
root-parasitic nematodes
tolerance
Journal
Journal of experimental botany
ISSN: 1460-2431
Titre abrégé: J Exp Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9882906
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 09 2023
29 09 2023
Historique:
received:
16
03
2023
accepted:
10
07
2023
medline:
2
10
2023
pubmed:
11
7
2023
entrez:
11
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Nematode migration, feeding site formation, withdrawal of plant assimilates, and activation of plant defence responses have a significant impact on plant growth and development. Plants display intraspecific variation in tolerance limits for root-feeding nematodes. Although disease tolerance has been recognized as a distinct trait in biotic interactions of mainly crops, we lack mechanistic insights. Progress is hampered by difficulties in quantification and laborious screening methods. We turned to the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, since it offers extensive resources to study the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying nematode-plant interactions. Through imaging of tolerance-related parameters, the green canopy area was identified as an accessible and robust measure for assessing damage due to cyst nematode infection. Subsequently, a high-throughput phenotyping platform simultaneously measuring the green canopy area growth of 960 A. thaliana plants was developed. This platform can accurately measure cyst nematode and root-knot nematode tolerance limits in A. thaliana through classical modelling approaches. Furthermore, real-time monitoring provided data for a novel view of tolerance, identifying a compensatory growth response. These findings show that our phenotyping platform will enable a new mechanistic understanding of tolerance to below-ground biotic stress.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37432651
pii: 7222654
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad266
pmc: PMC10540735
doi:
Substances chimiques
Arabidopsis Proteins
0
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.23518923.v1']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5487-5499Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology.
Références
J Exp Bot. 2018 Mar 24;69(7):1805-1814
pubmed: 29378065
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2020 Aug 25;58:77-96
pubmed: 32403981
Plant Dis. 2013 Mar;97(3):333-338
pubmed: 30722357
PLoS Pathog. 2014 Dec 11;10(12):e1004569
pubmed: 25500833
Plant Dis. 2016 Oct;100(10):2113-2118
pubmed: 30682995
Mol Plant Pathol. 2018 Jun;19(6):1454-1465
pubmed: 29027740
New Phytol. 2020 Jul;227(1):200-215
pubmed: 32129890
Dose Response. 2012 Sep 29;11(3):361-73
pubmed: 23983664
Trends Plant Sci. 2019 Apr;24(4):318-327
pubmed: 30755365
New Phytol. 2018 Apr;218(2):724-737
pubmed: 29468687
Mol Plant Pathol. 2013 Dec;14(9):946-61
pubmed: 23809086
New Phytol. 2023 Feb;237(3):807-822
pubmed: 36285401
PLoS Pathog. 2009 Jan;5(1):e1000266
pubmed: 19148279
Plant Methods. 2017 Sep 13;13:73
pubmed: 28924448
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Jul 08;4:241
pubmed: 23847644
Plant J. 2022 Nov;112(4):1070-1083
pubmed: 36181710
J Nematol. 2000 Jun;32(2):166-73
pubmed: 19270962
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2015;53:289-310
pubmed: 26047569
Planta. 2013 Nov;238(5):807-18
pubmed: 23824525
Sci Signal. 2014 Apr 08;7(320):ra33
pubmed: 24714570