Maternal occupational risk factors and preterm birth: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
28
10
2022
accepted:
15
03
2023
medline:
13
7
2023
pubmed:
11
7
2023
entrez:
11
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Preterm birth, which accounts for 33.1% of neonatal death globally, is the main cause of under-five mortality. A growing number of studies indicate that occupational risk factors during pregnancy are linked to an increased likelihood of poor pregnancy outcomes. The effect of physical occupational risks on preterm birth has received very little attention, and previous reviews have produced inconclusive results. This systematic review aims to update the evidence on the relationship between maternal physical occupational risks and preterm birth. We will search electronic databases including Ovid Medline, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of science to find peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between six common maternal physical occupational risks (heavy lifting, prolonged standing, heavy physical exertion, long working hours, shift work, and whole-body vibrations) and preterm birth. Articles published in English after 1 January 2000 will be included without geographic restrictions. Two reviewers will screen titles and abstracts independently, and then select full-text articles that meet inclusion criteria. Methodological quality of the included studies will be evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal method. The quality of evidence across each exposure and the outcome of interest will be examined by using the GRADE (Grade of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, Evaluation) method. Accordingly, a high level of evidence will lead to "strong recommendations". A moderate level of evidence will lead to "practice considerations". For all evidence levels below moderate, the message will be "not enough evidence from the scientific literature to guide policymakers, clinicians, and patients. If data permits, a meta-analysis will be conducted using Stata Software. In case where meta-analysis is not possible, we will perform a formal narrative synthesis. Evidence suggests that preterm birth is linked to a number of maternal occupational risk factors. This systematic review will update, compile, and critically review the evidence on the effect of maternal physical occupational risk on preterm birth. This systematic review will provide guidance to support decision-makers including maternal and child health services, other health care providers, and government policy agencies. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022357045.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37432928
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283752
pii: PONE-D-22-29810
pmc: PMC10335685
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0283752Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Adane et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Occup Environ Med. 2012 Aug;69(8):543-50
pubmed: 22744766
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Feb;33(3):318-28
pubmed: 26799967
Women Health. 2011 May;51(3):279-97
pubmed: 21547862
Occup Med (Lond). 2006 Dec;56(8):516-20
pubmed: 17151386
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Jun;95(6):652-63
pubmed: 26918772
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Apr;95(4):623-35
pubmed: 10725502
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Oct;19(10):1851-62
pubmed: 20809857
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;123(5):554-559
pubmed: 31558313
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 10;9(3):e90550
pubmed: 24614129
Environ Int. 2021 Jan;146:106157
pubmed: 33395953
Semin Perinatol. 2017 Nov;41(7):387-391
pubmed: 28865982
BJOG. 2003 Apr;110 Suppl 20:30-3
pubmed: 12763108
Cleve Clin J Med. 2020 Nov 23;87(12):759-767
pubmed: 33229393
Occup Environ Med. 2020 Jul;77(7):496-505
pubmed: 32184210
BJOG. 2009 Jun;116(7):943-52
pubmed: 19385963
Evid Based Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):85-87
pubmed: 28320705
BJOG. 2011 Nov;118(12):1429-37
pubmed: 21790955
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89
pubmed: 33781348
Workplace Health Saf. 2013 Dec;61(12):522-8; quiz 529
pubmed: 24328919
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014 Nov;87(8):835-49
pubmed: 24584887
Occup Med (Lond). 2006 Dec;56(8):521-31
pubmed: 17151388
Int J Public Health. 2012 Oct;57(5):817-26
pubmed: 22760548
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):563-576
pubmed: 31276631
Public Health Rev. 2022 Apr 28;43:1604653
pubmed: 35574566
Lancet. 2008 Mar 8;371(9615):787-8
pubmed: 18328908
Occup Environ Med. 2007 Apr;64(4):228-43
pubmed: 17095552
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Jul;94(1):5-11
pubmed: 16730012
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Jun;16(6):e17965
pubmed: 25068052
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014 Nov;87(8):809-34
pubmed: 24390632
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;222(3):224-238
pubmed: 31550447
Clin Perinatol. 2017 Jun;44(2):305-314
pubmed: 28477662
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1303-10
pubmed: 21802903
Midwifery. 2022 Jul;110:103334
pubmed: 35421789
Occup Environ Med. 2013 Apr;70(4):213-22
pubmed: 23343859
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan;200(1):51.e1-8
pubmed: 18976732