Relation between duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and risk of ischemic stroke after stent-assisted treatment of cerebral aneurysm (DAPTS ACE-registry).
Aneurysm
Intervention
Journal
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Jul 2023
11 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
28
04
2023
accepted:
18
06
2023
pubmed:
12
7
2023
medline:
12
7
2023
entrez:
11
7
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with cerebral aneurysm who undergo stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) has not been established. We aimed to clarify the association between duration of DAPT and incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with cerebral aneurysm. We registered patients with cerebral aneurysm who underwent SACE in 27 hospitals in Japan. Those treated with DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) were eligible for inclusion in a previously reported randomized control trial (RCT). Patients who were ineligible or refused to participate to the RCT were followed-up for 15 months after SACE as the non-RCT cohort. Our study examined both the RCT and non-RCT cohorts. The primary and secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic events. Among the 313 patients registered, 296 were included for analysis (of these, 136 were RCT patients and 160 were non-RCT patients). Patients who were treated with DAPT for more than 6 months (n=191) were classified as the long-term DAPT group. Those treated less than 6 months (n=105) were classified as the short-term group. The incidence of ischemic stroke did not significantly differ between the long-term group (2.5 per 100 person-years) and the short-term group (3.2 per 100 person-years); nor did incidence of hemorrhagic events (0.8 and 3.2 per 100 person-years, respectively). The period of DAPT was not significantly associated with incidence rates of ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic events. Duration of DAPT was not associated with the incidence of ischemic stroke in the first 15 months after SACE.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with cerebral aneurysm who undergo stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) has not been established. We aimed to clarify the association between duration of DAPT and incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with cerebral aneurysm.
METHODS
METHODS
We registered patients with cerebral aneurysm who underwent SACE in 27 hospitals in Japan. Those treated with DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) were eligible for inclusion in a previously reported randomized control trial (RCT). Patients who were ineligible or refused to participate to the RCT were followed-up for 15 months after SACE as the non-RCT cohort. Our study examined both the RCT and non-RCT cohorts. The primary and secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic events.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the 313 patients registered, 296 were included for analysis (of these, 136 were RCT patients and 160 were non-RCT patients). Patients who were treated with DAPT for more than 6 months (n=191) were classified as the long-term DAPT group. Those treated less than 6 months (n=105) were classified as the short-term group. The incidence of ischemic stroke did not significantly differ between the long-term group (2.5 per 100 person-years) and the short-term group (3.2 per 100 person-years); nor did incidence of hemorrhagic events (0.8 and 3.2 per 100 person-years, respectively). The period of DAPT was not significantly associated with incidence rates of ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic events.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Duration of DAPT was not associated with the incidence of ischemic stroke in the first 15 months after SACE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37433663
pii: jnis-2023-020495
doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020495
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: HY reports research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and lecturer’s fees from Stryker, Medtronic, Terumo, Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Otsuka Pharmaceutical. and Medico's Hirata. HI reports lecture's fee from Medtronic Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Stryker Jaoan, Terumo, and Asahi Intecc. HO reports research grants from Terumo, Stryker, Medtronic, Medikit, and Kaneka and consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Kaneka, and Asahi Intec. KS reports lecturer’s fees from Medtronic Japan, Kaneka Medix, and Terumo. YM reports lecturer’s fees from Daiichi Sakyo, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Medtronic, Stryker, Terumo, Johnson &Johnson, Kaneka, and Medico’s Hirata. KK reports lecturer’s fees from Kyowa Kirin and Daiichi Sankyo. YM serves in an advisory role for GE Healthcare, Fuji Systems, Medico’s Hirata, and Stryker; he reports patents and royalties from Sumitomo Bakelite and lecturer’s fees from GE Healthcare, Stryker, Medtronic, Medico’s Hirata, Century Medical, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Kaneka, and Fuji Systems. TS reports research grants from CANON medical systems, lecturer’s fees from Medtronic, and consulting fees from Kaneka Medix. CS reports research grants from Biomedical Solutions, Medtronic, and Terumo and lecturer’s fees from Asahi-Intec, Biomedical Solutions, Medtronic, and Terumo; he is also a member of the advisory boards of Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, and Terumo.