Potential effect modifiers for treatment with chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation for recurrent headaches in children aged 7-14 years: development of and results from a secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial.
Children
Chiropractic
Clinical trial
Effect modifier
Headache
Manual therapy
Journal
Chiropractic & manual therapies
ISSN: 2045-709X
Titre abrégé: Chiropr Man Therap
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101551481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 07 2023
11 07 2023
Historique:
received:
07
02
2023
accepted:
15
06
2023
medline:
13
7
2023
pubmed:
12
7
2023
entrez:
11
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating the effect of chiropractic manipulation in 199 children aged 7-14 years with recurrent headaches demonstrated a significant reduction of number of days with headache and a better global perceived effect (GPE) in the chiropractic manipulation group compared to a sham manipulation group. However, potential modifiers for the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation of children with recurrent headaches have never been identified. The present study is a secondary analysis of data from that RCT and will investigate potential effect modifiers for the benefit of chiropractic manipulation for children with headache. Sixteen potential effect modifiers were identified from the literature and a summary index was prespecified based on clinical experience. Relevant variables were extracted from baseline questionnaires, and outcomes were obtained by means of short text messages. The modifying effect of the candidate variables was assessed by fitting interaction models to the data of the RCT. In addition, an attempt to define a new summary index was made. The prespecified index showed no modifying effect. Four single variables demonstrated a treatment effect difference of more than 1 day with headache per week between the lower and the upper end of the spectrum: intensity of headache (p = 0.122), Frequency of headache (p = 0.031), sleep duration (p = 0.243), and Socioeconomic status (p = 0.082). Five variables had a treatment effect difference of more than 0.7 points on the GPE scale between the lower and the upper end of the spectrum: Frequency of headache (p = 0.056), Sport activity (p = 0.110), Sleep duration (p = 0.080), History of neck pain (p = 0.011), and Headache in the family (0.050). A new summary index could be constructed giving highest weight to History of neck pain and Headache in the family and Frequency of headache. The index suggests a difference of about 1 point in GPE between low and high values of the index. Chiropractic manipulation offers a moderate benefit for a broad spectrum of children. However, it cannot be excluded that specific headache characteristics, family factors, or a history of neck pain may modify the effect. This question must be addressed in future studies. ClinicalTrials.gov (Albers et al in Curr Pain Headache Rep 19:3-4, 2015), identifier NCT02684916, registered 02/18/2016-retrospectively registered.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating the effect of chiropractic manipulation in 199 children aged 7-14 years with recurrent headaches demonstrated a significant reduction of number of days with headache and a better global perceived effect (GPE) in the chiropractic manipulation group compared to a sham manipulation group. However, potential modifiers for the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation of children with recurrent headaches have never been identified. The present study is a secondary analysis of data from that RCT and will investigate potential effect modifiers for the benefit of chiropractic manipulation for children with headache.
METHODS
Sixteen potential effect modifiers were identified from the literature and a summary index was prespecified based on clinical experience. Relevant variables were extracted from baseline questionnaires, and outcomes were obtained by means of short text messages. The modifying effect of the candidate variables was assessed by fitting interaction models to the data of the RCT. In addition, an attempt to define a new summary index was made.
RESULTS
The prespecified index showed no modifying effect. Four single variables demonstrated a treatment effect difference of more than 1 day with headache per week between the lower and the upper end of the spectrum: intensity of headache (p = 0.122), Frequency of headache (p = 0.031), sleep duration (p = 0.243), and Socioeconomic status (p = 0.082). Five variables had a treatment effect difference of more than 0.7 points on the GPE scale between the lower and the upper end of the spectrum: Frequency of headache (p = 0.056), Sport activity (p = 0.110), Sleep duration (p = 0.080), History of neck pain (p = 0.011), and Headache in the family (0.050). A new summary index could be constructed giving highest weight to History of neck pain and Headache in the family and Frequency of headache. The index suggests a difference of about 1 point in GPE between low and high values of the index.
CONCLUSION
Chiropractic manipulation offers a moderate benefit for a broad spectrum of children. However, it cannot be excluded that specific headache characteristics, family factors, or a history of neck pain may modify the effect. This question must be addressed in future studies.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov (Albers et al in Curr Pain Headache Rep 19:3-4, 2015), identifier NCT02684916, registered 02/18/2016-retrospectively registered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37434189
doi: 10.1186/s12998-023-00492-2
pii: 10.1186/s12998-023-00492-2
pmc: PMC10337090
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02684916']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Headache. 2020 Nov;60(10):2330-2339
pubmed: 33159460
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2015 Mar;19(3):4
pubmed: 25754597
Headache. 2014 May;54(5):817-29
pubmed: 24750094
Pediatrics. 2014 Feb;133(2):e291-8
pubmed: 24394687
J Pain. 2017 Jan;18(1):54-65
pubmed: 27765643
Cephalalgia. 2002 Apr;22(3):179-85
pubmed: 12047454
Front Neurol. 2019 Jul 16;10:771
pubmed: 31379721
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2012 Mar;74(2):245-266
pubmed: 25506256
Headache. 2019 Apr;59(4):532-542
pubmed: 30973196
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;72(1):86-92
pubmed: 11784831
Eur J Pain. 2020 Oct;24(9):1687-1702
pubmed: 32621321
Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Mar 28;22(1):12
pubmed: 24679336
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2011 May;15(3):234-40
pubmed: 21177128
J Headache Pain. 2016 Dec;17(1):80
pubmed: 27596923
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 1;32(21):2339-47
pubmed: 17906576
Headache. 2008 Apr;48(4):529-44
pubmed: 18042227
Chiropr Man Therap. 2021 Jan 7;29(1):1
pubmed: 33413519
Headache. 2008 Jan;48(1):16-25
pubmed: 18184281
Cephalalgia. 2022 Jan;42(1):63-72
pubmed: 34404258
Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Aug 23;27:40
pubmed: 31462990
Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Feb 15;20(2):E5
pubmed: 16512656
J Headache Pain. 2012 Mar;13(2):129-36
pubmed: 22200765
J Pain Res. 2019 Dec 23;12:3437-3459
pubmed: 31920368
Chiropr Man Therap. 2023 Jan 30;31(1):5
pubmed: 36717833
Cephalalgia. 1997 Jun;17(4):492-8
pubmed: 9209768
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
J Child Neurol. 2009 May;24(5):536-43
pubmed: 19406755
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012 Feb;16(1):60-72
pubmed: 22102156
Australas Chiropr Osteopathy. 2004 Nov;12(2):57-71
pubmed: 17987214
Children (Basel). 2022 Oct 28;9(11):
pubmed: 36360373
Cephalalgia. 2007 Jun;27(6):519-27
pubmed: 17598791
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 06;5:11774
pubmed: 26145718
J Am Stat Assoc. 2014 Oct;109(508):1517-1532
pubmed: 25729117
Neurology. 2010 Aug 24;75(8):712-7
pubmed: 20720191
Phys Ther. 2009 Jul;89(7):698-704
pubmed: 19465372
J Headache Pain. 2011 Feb;12(1):25-34
pubmed: 21170567
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 09;17(11):
pubmed: 32527071
Neurology. 2007 Sep 11;69(11):1169-77
pubmed: 17846416
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Oct;32(8):607-15
pubmed: 19836596