Participatory development of a framework to actively involve people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in conducting a systematic review: the DECIDE-SR protocol.

Collaboration Dementia Framework Participatory research Public

Journal

Research involvement and engagement
ISSN: 2056-7529
Titre abrégé: Res Involv Engagem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101708164

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 14 02 2023
accepted: 29 06 2023
medline: 12 7 2023
pubmed: 12 7 2023
entrez: 11 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Systematic reviews summarize and evaluate relevant studies to contribute to evidence-based practice. Internationally, researchers have reached a consensus that the active involvement of the public leads to better research. Despite this agreement, there are many reviews of research concerning healthcare interventions intended to promote the care of people living with dementia and those from their social network (e.g., close contacts, both family and non-family members) primarily involve only healthcare professionals and other experts. Due to the lack of a dementia-sensitive framework to actively involve people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals as co-researchers in systematic reviews, it is important to develop a framework to inform practice. For this framework development process, we will recruit four people living with dementia and a total of four people from their social network, and three healthcare professionals working in acute or long-term care settings. We will conduct regular meetings with these groups of the public and healthcare professionals to include them in all stages of the systematic review. We will also identify and develop methods necessary to ensure meaningful involvement. The results will be documented and analyzed for the development of a framework. For the planning and preparation for these meetings, as well as the conduct of the meetings themselves, we will be guided by the principles of the INVOLVE approach. In addition, the ACTIVE framework will be used to guide the degree of involvement and the stage in the review process. We assume that our transparent approach to the development of a framework to support the active involvement of people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews will serve as an impetus for and provide guidance to other researchers with the goal of increasing researchers' focus on this topic and facilitating systematic reviews that apply participatory approaches. Trial registration is unnecessary as no intervention study will be conducted. Systematic reviews summarize and evaluate studies on a particular topic. They provide information, for example, regarding whether an intervention is beneficial. This type of review is particularly important for healthcare professionals because they can use the results of the review to guide their actions. There is a growing awareness that the public, including people living with dementia and those from their social network (e.g., relatives, friends), need to be actively involved in the process of preparing these reviews when they are concerned with the topic of the reviews. Despite this consensus, it is often the case that only healthcare professionals are involved in such reviews. At present, no framework for the active involvement of people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews has been developed. Therefore, we will develop such a framework together in collaboration with a range of members of the public and healthcare professionals. For this purpose, in addition to healthcare professionals, we will involve people living with dementia and those from their social network. Over the course of several meetings, we will engage in discussion with them and identify the stages of the process of conducting a systematic review in which their involvement as members of the researcher team is meaningful. We will furthermore identify the requirements associated with such an active involvement. A written report of these discussions will be produced in collaboration with the group. This will contribute towards the development of a framework for other researchers. The framework will later be made available to the public free of charge to increase awareness of this topic and to contribute towards more frequent, well-organised and meaningful involvement of people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Systematic reviews summarize and evaluate relevant studies to contribute to evidence-based practice. Internationally, researchers have reached a consensus that the active involvement of the public leads to better research. Despite this agreement, there are many reviews of research concerning healthcare interventions intended to promote the care of people living with dementia and those from their social network (e.g., close contacts, both family and non-family members) primarily involve only healthcare professionals and other experts. Due to the lack of a dementia-sensitive framework to actively involve people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals as co-researchers in systematic reviews, it is important to develop a framework to inform practice.
METHODS METHODS
For this framework development process, we will recruit four people living with dementia and a total of four people from their social network, and three healthcare professionals working in acute or long-term care settings. We will conduct regular meetings with these groups of the public and healthcare professionals to include them in all stages of the systematic review. We will also identify and develop methods necessary to ensure meaningful involvement. The results will be documented and analyzed for the development of a framework. For the planning and preparation for these meetings, as well as the conduct of the meetings themselves, we will be guided by the principles of the INVOLVE approach. In addition, the ACTIVE framework will be used to guide the degree of involvement and the stage in the review process.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
We assume that our transparent approach to the development of a framework to support the active involvement of people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews will serve as an impetus for and provide guidance to other researchers with the goal of increasing researchers' focus on this topic and facilitating systematic reviews that apply participatory approaches.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
Trial registration is unnecessary as no intervention study will be conducted.
Systematic reviews summarize and evaluate studies on a particular topic. They provide information, for example, regarding whether an intervention is beneficial. This type of review is particularly important for healthcare professionals because they can use the results of the review to guide their actions. There is a growing awareness that the public, including people living with dementia and those from their social network (e.g., relatives, friends), need to be actively involved in the process of preparing these reviews when they are concerned with the topic of the reviews. Despite this consensus, it is often the case that only healthcare professionals are involved in such reviews. At present, no framework for the active involvement of people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews has been developed. Therefore, we will develop such a framework together in collaboration with a range of members of the public and healthcare professionals. For this purpose, in addition to healthcare professionals, we will involve people living with dementia and those from their social network. Over the course of several meetings, we will engage in discussion with them and identify the stages of the process of conducting a systematic review in which their involvement as members of the researcher team is meaningful. We will furthermore identify the requirements associated with such an active involvement. A written report of these discussions will be produced in collaboration with the group. This will contribute towards the development of a framework for other researchers. The framework will later be made available to the public free of charge to increase awareness of this topic and to contribute towards more frequent, well-organised and meaningful involvement of people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Systematic reviews summarize and evaluate studies on a particular topic. They provide information, for example, regarding whether an intervention is beneficial. This type of review is particularly important for healthcare professionals because they can use the results of the review to guide their actions. There is a growing awareness that the public, including people living with dementia and those from their social network (e.g., relatives, friends), need to be actively involved in the process of preparing these reviews when they are concerned with the topic of the reviews. Despite this consensus, it is often the case that only healthcare professionals are involved in such reviews. At present, no framework for the active involvement of people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews has been developed. Therefore, we will develop such a framework together in collaboration with a range of members of the public and healthcare professionals. For this purpose, in addition to healthcare professionals, we will involve people living with dementia and those from their social network. Over the course of several meetings, we will engage in discussion with them and identify the stages of the process of conducting a systematic review in which their involvement as members of the researcher team is meaningful. We will furthermore identify the requirements associated with such an active involvement. A written report of these discussions will be produced in collaboration with the group. This will contribute towards the development of a framework for other researchers. The framework will later be made available to the public free of charge to increase awareness of this topic and to contribute towards more frequent, well-organised and meaningful involvement of people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37434210
doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00461-2
pii: 10.1186/s40900-023-00461-2
pmc: PMC10337195
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

52

Subventions

Organisme : Federal Ministry of Education and Research in Germany (BMBF)
ID : 01KG2213
Organisme : Federal Ministry of Education and Research in Germany (BMBF)
ID : 01KG2213
Organisme : Federal Ministry of Education and Research in Germany (BMBF)
ID : 01KG2213
Organisme : Federal Ministry of Education and Research in Germany (BMBF)
ID : 01KG2213
Organisme : Federal Ministry of Education and Research in Germany (BMBF)
ID : 01KG2213
Organisme : Federal Ministry of Education and Research in Germany (BMBF)
ID : 01KG2213
Organisme : Federal Ministry of Education and Research in Germany (BMBF)
ID : 01KG2213

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Egger JIM, Higgins JPT, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health research meta-analysis in context. Oxford: Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2022.
doi: 10.1002/9781119099369
Rommerskirch-Manietta M, Braunwarth JI, Quasdorf T, Manietta C, Rodrigues-Recchia D, Reuther S, et al. Organizational capacity building in nursing facilities to promote resident mobility: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;22(12):2408–24.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.09.017 pubmed: 34653383
Manietta C, Labonté V, Möhler R. Structured care protocols to reduce behavior that challenges in people with Dementia: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;23(7):1137–44.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.10.012 pubmed: 34838509
Powell BJ, Fernandez ME, Williams NJ, Aarons GA, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, et al. Enhancing the impact of implementation strategies in healthcare: a research Agenda. Front Public Health. 2019;7:3.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00003 pubmed: 30723713 pmcid: 6350272
Manietta C, Quasdorf T, Rommerskirch-Manietta M, Braunwarth JI, Purwins D, Roes M. Protocol for conducting scoping reviews to map implementation strategies in different care settings: focusing on evidence-based interventions for preselected phenomena in people with dementia. BMJ Open. 2021;11(9):e051611.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051611 pubmed: 34493523 pmcid: 8424849
Higgins PJ, Thomas J. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. New Jersey, USA and Chichester, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2020.
Gove D, Diaz-Ponce A, Georges J, Moniz-Cook E, Mountain G, Chattat R, et al. Alzheimer Europe’s position on involving people with dementia in research through PPI (patient and public involvement). Aging Ment Health. 2018;22(6):723–9.
doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1317334 pubmed: 28513210
Rohra H, Mann J, Rommerskirch-Manietta M, Roes M, Kuliga S. Wayfinding and urban design from the perspective of people living With Dementia—a call for participatory research. J Urban Des Ment Health. 2021;7(4).
McGowan J, Akl EA, Coello PA, Brennan S, Dahm P, Davoli M, et al. Update on the JCE GRADE series and other GRADE article types. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;140:163–4.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.023 pubmed: 34089781
Pollock A, Campbell P, Struthers C, Synnot A, Nunn J, Hill S, et al. Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):208.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0852-0 pubmed: 30474560 pmcid: 6260873
Greenhalgh T, Hinton L, Finlay T, Macfarlane A, Fahy N, Clyde B, et al. Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: systematic review and co-design pilot. Health Expect. 2019;22(4):785–801.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12888 pmcid: 6737756
Herrmann LK, Welter E, Leverenz J, Lerner AJ, Udelson N, Kanetsky C, et al. A systematic review of dementia-related stigma research: Can we move the stigma dial? Am J Geriatr Psychiatr. 2018;26(3):316–31.
doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.09.006
Hung L, Mann J, Upreti M. Using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) to foster the adoption of a new dementia education game during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gerontologist. 2022;63(3):467–77.
doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac138
Di Lorito C, Godfrey M, Dunlop M, Bosco A, Pollock K, van der Wardt V, et al. Adding to the knowledge on patient and public involvement: reflections from an experience of co-research with carers of people with dementia. Health Expect. 2020;23(3):691–706.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13049 pubmed: 32181553 pmcid: 7321727
Kuliga S, Berwig M, Roes M. Wayfinding in people with Alzheimer’s disease: perspective taking and architectural cognition—a vision paper on future dementia care research opportunities. Sustainability. 2021;13(3):1084.
doi: 10.3390/su13031084
Beresford-Dent J, Sprange K, Mountain G, Mason C, Wright J, Craig C, et al. Embedding patient and public involvement in dementia research: reflections from experiences during the “Journeying through Dementia” randomised controlled trial. Dementia (London). 2022;21(6):1987–2003.
doi: 10.1177/14713012221106816 pubmed: 35670381
Pollock A, Campbell P, Struthers C, Synnot A, Nunn J, Hill S, et al. Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019;24(4):245–55.
doi: 10.1177/1355819619841647 pubmed: 30997859
Pollock D, Alexander L, Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, Godfrey CM, et al. Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI scoping review methodology group. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2022;20(4):969–79.
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00416 pubmed: 35477565
Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358: j3453.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453 pubmed: 28768629 pmcid: 5539518
INVOLVE. Briefing notes for researchers: public involvment in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE; 2012.
INVOLVE. Public involvement in systematic reviews: Supplement to the briefing notes for researchers. Eastleigh: INVOLVE; 2012.
Haberstroh J, Müller T, Knebel M, Kaspar R, Oswald F, Pantel J. Can the mini-mental state examination predict capacity to consent to treatment? GeroPsych. 2014;27(4):151–9.
doi: 10.1024/1662-9647/a000113
Gyllensten K, Andersson G, Muller H. Experiences of reduced work hours for nurses and assistant nurses at a surgical department: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2017;16:16.
doi: 10.1186/s12912-017-0210-x pubmed: 28396616 pmcid: 5379756
Liabo K. Care leavers’ involvement in research: an ethnographic case study on impact. Qual Soc Work. 2016;17(1):133–51.
doi: 10.1177/1473325016649255
Mann J, Hung L. Co-research with people living with dementia for change. Action Res. 2018;17(4):573–90.
doi: 10.1177/1476750318787005
Gattrell WT, Hungin AP, Price A, Winchester CC, Tovey D, Hughes EL, et al. ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022;7(1):3.
doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00122-0 pubmed: 35672782 pmcid: 9171734
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;88:105906.
Merner B, Lowe D, Walsh L, Synnot A, Stratil JM, Lewin S, et al. Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: lessons from Cochrane’s public health and health systems network. AJPH. 2021;7:1210–5.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306252
Roberts C, Rochford-Brennan H, Goodrick J, Gove D, Diaz-Ponce A, Georges J. Our reflections of patient and public involvement in research as members of the European working group of people with Dementia. Dementia (London). 2020;19(1):10–7.
doi: 10.1177/1471301219876402 pubmed: 31875708
WHO. Ensuring a human rights-based approach for people living with dementia. World Health Organization; 2015.
Fraser C, Carrington B, Crooks J, Diffey J, Evans N, Kirk S, et al. A blueprint for involvement: reflections of lived experience co-researchers and academic researchers on working collaboratively. Res Involv Engagem. 2022;8(1):68.
doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00404-3

Auteurs

Mike Rommerskirch-Manietta (M)

Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany. Mike.Rommerskirch-Manietta@dzne.de.
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany. Mike.Rommerskirch-Manietta@dzne.de.

Christina Manietta (C)

Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.

Anna Louisa Hoffmann (AL)

Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.

Helga Rohra (H)

Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Patient Advisory Board, Bonn, Germany.

Dianne Gove (D)

Alzheimer Europe, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

Birgit Alpers (B)

Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.

Lillian Hung (L)

School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Carol R Geary (CR)

College of Medicine, University of Nebraska, Omaha, USA.

Katherine M Abbott (KM)

Department of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, USA.
Scripps Gerontology Center, Oxford, USA.

Lily Haopu Ren (LH)

School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Stefanie Oberfeld (S)

Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, St. Rochus-Hospital, Telgte, Germany.

Ana Diaz (A)

Alzheimer Europe, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

Martina Roes (M)

Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.

Classifications MeSH