Staphylococcus aureus From an Acute Fracture-related Infection Displays Important Bacteriological and Histopathologic Differences From a Chronic Equivalent in a Murine Bone Infection Model.

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus is the leading pathogen in fracture-related infection. Previous in vitro experiments, in vivo testing in wax moth larvae, and genomic analysis of clinical S. aureu s isolates from fracture-related infection identified low-virulence (Lo-SA5464) and high-virulence (Hi-SA5458) strains. These findings correlated with acute fracture-related infection induced by Hi-SA5458, whereas Lo-SA5464 caused a chronic fracture-related infection in its human host. However, it remains unclear whether and to what extent the causative pathogen is attributable to these disparities in fracture-related infections.

QUESTION/PURPOSE

Are there differences in the course of infection when comparing these two different clinical isolates in a murine fracture-related infection model, as measured by (1) clinical observations of weight loss, (2) quantitative bacteriology, (3) immune response, and (4) radiographic and histopathologic morphology?

METHODS

Twenty-five (including one replacement animal) female (no sex-specific influences expected), skeletally mature C57Bl/6N inbred mice between 20 and 28 weeks old underwent femoral osteotomy stabilized by titanium locking plates. Fracture-related infection was established by inoculation of high-virulence S. aureus EDCC 5458 (Hi-SA5458) or low-virulence S. aureus EDCC 5464 (Lo-SA5464) in the fracture gap. Each of these groups consisted of 12 randomly assigned animals. Mice were euthanized 4 and 14 days postsurgery, resulting in six animals per group and timepoint. The severity and progression of infection were assessed in terms of clinical observation of weight loss, quantitative bacteriology, quantitative serum cytokine levels, qualitative analysis of postmortem radiographs, and semiquantitative histopathologic evaluation.

RESULTS

For clinical observations of weight change, no differences were seen at Day 4 between Hi-SA5458- and Lo-SA5464-infected animals (mean -0.6 ± 0.1 grams versus -0.8 ± 0.2 grams, mean difference -0.2 grams [95% CI -0.8 to 0.5 grams]; p =0.43), while at 14 days, the Hi-SA5458 group lost more weight than the Lo-SA5464 group (mean -1.55 ± 0.2 grams versus -0.8 ± 0.3 grams; mean difference 0.7 grams [95% CI 0.2 to 1.3 grams]; p = 0.02). Quantitative bacteriological results 4 days postoperatively revealed a higher bacterial load in soft tissue samples in Hi-SA5458-infected animals than in the Lo-SA5464-infected cohort (median 6.8 x 10 7 colony-forming units [CFU]/g, range 2.2 x 10 7 to 2.1 x 10 9 CFU/g versus median 6.0 x 10 6 CFU/g, range 1.8 x 10 5 to 1.3 x 10 8 CFU/g; difference of medians 6.2 x 10 7 CFU/g; p = 0.03). At both timepoints, mice infected with the Hi-SA5458 strain also displayed higher proportions of bacterial dissemination into organs than Lo-SA5464-infected animals (67% [24 of 36 organs] versus 14% [five of 36 organs]; OR 12.0 [95% CI 3.7 to 36]; p < 0.001). This was accompanied by a pronounced proinflammatory response on Day 14, indicated by increased serum cytokine levels of interleukin-1β (mean 9.0 ± 2.2 pg/mL versus 5.3 ± 1.5 pg/mL; mean difference 3.6 pg/mL [95% CI 2.0 to 5.2 pg/mL]; p < 0.001), IL-6 (mean 458.6 ± 370.7 pg/mL versus 201.0 ±89.6 pg/mL; mean difference 257.6 pg/mL [95% CI 68.7 to 446.5 pg/mL]; p = 0.006), IL-10 (mean 15.9 ± 3.5 pg/mL versus 9.9 ± 1.0 pg/mL; mean difference 6.0 pg/mL [95% CI 3.2 to 8.7 pg/mL]; p < 0.001), and interferon-γ (mean 2.7 ± 1.9 pg/mL versus 0.8 ± 0.3 pg/mL; mean difference 1.8 pg/mL [95% CI 0.5 to 3.1 pg/mL]; p = 0.002) in Hi-SA5458-infected compared with Lo-SA5464-infected animals. The semiquantitative histopathologic assessment on Day 4 revealed higher grades of granulocyte infiltration in Hi-SA5458-infected animals (mean grade 2.5 ± 1.0) than in Lo-SA5464-infected animals (mean grade 1.8 ± 1.4; mean difference 0.7 [95% CI 0.001 to 1.4]; p = 0.0498). On Day 14, bone healing at the fracture site was present to a higher extent in Lo-SA5464-infected animals than in Hi-SA5458-infected animals (mean grade 0.2 ± 0.4 versus 1.8 ± 1.2; mean difference -1.6 [95% CI -2.8 to -0.5]; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Similar to septic infection in a human host, infection with Hi-SA5458 in this murine model was characterized by a higher bacterial load, more-pronounced systemic dissemination, and stronger systemic and local inflammation. Thus, there is strong support for the idea that pathogenic virulence plays a crucial role in fracture-related infections. To confirm our observations, future studies should focus on characterizing S. aureus virulence at the genomic and transcriptomic levels in more clinical isolates and patients. Comparing knockout and wildtype strains in vitro and in vivo, including the S. aureus strains studied, could confirm our findings and identify the genomic features responsible for S. aureus virulence in fracture-related infections.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

For translational use, virulence profiles of S. aureus may be useful in guiding treatment decisions in the future. Once specific virulence targets are identified, one approach to fracture-related infections with high-virulence strains might be the development of antivirulence agents, particularly to treat or prevent septic dissemination. For fracture-related infections with low virulence, prolonged antimicrobial therapy or exchange of an indwelling implant might be beneficial owing to slower growth and persistence capacity.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.