Description of Specialty Practice-10 Years Onward: The Changes in Geriatric Physical Therapy.


Journal

Journal of geriatric physical therapy (2001)
ISSN: 2152-0895
Titre abrégé: J Geriatr Phys Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101142169

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jul 2023
Historique:
medline: 13 7 2023
pubmed: 13 7 2023
entrez: 13 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

An analysis of practice is conducted by the American Board of Physical Therapy Specialties (ABPTS) every 10 years to revalidate, update, and revise the description of specialty practice (DSP) for each specialty. The Geriatric Specialty Council recently conducted an analysis of practice and revised its content consistent with established procedures by the ABPTS. The purpose of this article is threefold: first, to describe the process of the most recent practice analysis; second, to report revisions to the description of specialty practice based on the analysis of practice; and third, to identify elements of practice that define current specialist practice in geriatric physical therapy. A 10-member committee of subject matter experts (SMEs) and a psychometric consultant developed a survey instrument addressing geriatric physical therapy specialty practice areas. The survey was initially pilot-tested and subsequently administered online to a sample of 801 board-certified geriatric clinical specialists. The consultant facilitated the consensus process to determine decision rules in selecting the final competencies describing current geriatric physical therapy specialty practice. A total of 372 respondents fully or partially completed the survey, resulting in a response rate of 46.4%. Based on a priori decision rules regarding survey data, consensus of the group of SMEs, and input from the ABPTS, the DSP for geriatric physical therapy specialty practice was revised. Revisions (elimination [-] of prior items and addition [+] of new items) were made in Section 1: Knowledge Areas (-8 and +6), in Section 2: Professional Roles, Responsibilities, and Values (-14 and +4), and Section 3: Practice Expectations (-53 and +28). The revised DSP will be used as the basis for the development of the examination blueprint for the specialist examination in geriatric physical therapy and the curricula for residency programs in geriatric physical therapy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
An analysis of practice is conducted by the American Board of Physical Therapy Specialties (ABPTS) every 10 years to revalidate, update, and revise the description of specialty practice (DSP) for each specialty. The Geriatric Specialty Council recently conducted an analysis of practice and revised its content consistent with established procedures by the ABPTS.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this article is threefold: first, to describe the process of the most recent practice analysis; second, to report revisions to the description of specialty practice based on the analysis of practice; and third, to identify elements of practice that define current specialist practice in geriatric physical therapy.
METHODS METHODS
A 10-member committee of subject matter experts (SMEs) and a psychometric consultant developed a survey instrument addressing geriatric physical therapy specialty practice areas. The survey was initially pilot-tested and subsequently administered online to a sample of 801 board-certified geriatric clinical specialists. The consultant facilitated the consensus process to determine decision rules in selecting the final competencies describing current geriatric physical therapy specialty practice.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 372 respondents fully or partially completed the survey, resulting in a response rate of 46.4%. Based on a priori decision rules regarding survey data, consensus of the group of SMEs, and input from the ABPTS, the DSP for geriatric physical therapy specialty practice was revised. Revisions (elimination [-] of prior items and addition [+] of new items) were made in Section 1: Knowledge Areas (-8 and +6), in Section 2: Professional Roles, Responsibilities, and Values (-14 and +4), and Section 3: Practice Expectations (-53 and +28).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The revised DSP will be used as the basis for the development of the examination blueprint for the specialist examination in geriatric physical therapy and the curricula for residency programs in geriatric physical therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37439823
doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000387
pii: 00139143-990000000-00032
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 APTA Geriatrics, An Academy of the American Physical Therapy Association.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Références

American Board of Physical Therapy Specialties. Geriatric Physical Therapy Description of Specialty Practice. American Board of Physical Therapy Specialties; 2009.
Greenwald NF. Educational activities related to geriatrics in physical therapy. Geritopics. 1982;5(3):9–10.
Wharton MA. Identification of Advanced Level Performance Tasks in Geriatric Physical Therapy. University of Pittsburgh; 1985.
American Board of Physical Therapy Specialists. Geriatric Physical Therapy Specialty Competencies. American Board of Physical Therapy Specialists; 1990.
American Physical Therapy Association. A Normative Model of Physical Therapist Professional Education. American Physical Therapy Association; 1997.
American Physical Therapy Association. Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. Phys Ther. 1997;77:1163–1650.
American Physical Therapy Association. Guide to Physical Therapy Practice 3.0. American Physical Therapy Association; 2019;3.
van Bodegom-Vos L, Verhoef J, Dickmann M, et al. A qualitative study of barriers to the implementation of a rheumatoid arthritis guideline among generalist and specialist physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2012;92(10):1292–1305. doi:10.2522/ptj.20110097
doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110097
American Board of Physical Therapy Specialties. Geriatric Physical Therapy Description of Specialty Practice. American Board of Physical Therapy Specialties; 2021.
Kenyon LK, Dole RL, Gibbs KC, et al. Contemporary practice as a board-certified pediatric clinical specialist: a practice analysis. Ped Phys Ther. 2020;32(4):347–354. doi:10.1097/PEP.0000000000000731
doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000731
Harro CC, Myers RO, Perry SB, Legters K, Barry J, McCombe Waller S. Practice analysis study: a method for residency curriculum development. J Phys Ther Ed. 2019;33(4):315–324. doi:10.1097/JTE.0000000000000107
doi: 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000107
Johanson MA, Miller MB, Coe JB, Campo M. Orthopaedic physical therapy: update to the description of specialty practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(1):9–18. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6211
doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6211
Mulligan EP, Weber MD, Reinking MF. Competency revalidation study of specialty practice in sports physical therapy. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(7):959–973.

Auteurs

Ronald De Vera Barredo (R)

College of Health Sciences, Tennessee State University, Nashville.

Morris Beato (M)

School of Kinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Central Florida, Orlando.

Christine Childers (C)

Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, The University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson.

Kevin Chui (K)

Department of Physical Therapy, Waldron College of Health and Human Services, Radford University, Radford, Virginia.

William Scott Doerhoff (WS)

Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock.

Sandy Ganz (S)

Self-employed at Boca Raton, Florida.

Tamara Gravano (T)

School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa.

Tim McGonigle (T)

Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO), Alexandria, Virginia.

Karma Peters (K)

Aurora Health at Home, Greater Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Classifications MeSH