Generic ibrutinib a potential cost-effective strategy for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Bendamustine Chlorambucil Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia Generic Ibrutinib Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio Incremental cost-utility ratio Innovator Low-middle-income country Quality-adjusted life year Rituximab Willingness to pay

Journal

Annals of hematology
ISSN: 1432-0584
Titre abrégé: Ann Hematol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9107334

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 20 05 2023
accepted: 24 06 2023
pubmed: 13 7 2023
medline: 13 7 2023
entrez: 13 7 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Though the chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) management options in India are still limited compared to the novel drug options in resource-rich settings, the availability of less costly generics and the government health insurance scheme has enabled many patients to access the newer drugs in India. The current study compared the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of existing initial management options for the progression-free survival (PFS) time horizon from the patient's perspective. A two-health-state, PFS and progressive disease, Markov model was assumed for three regimens (generics): ibrutinib monotherapy, bendamustine-rituximab (B-R), and rituximab-chlorambucil (RClb) used as the frontline treatment of CLL patients in India. All costs, utilization of services, and consequences data during the PFS period were collected from interviewing patients during follow-up visits. The transition probability (TP) and average PFS information were obtained from landmark published studies. EQ-5D-5L questionnaires were utilized to assess the quality of life (QoL). Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were measured during the PFS period. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) were studied. Upon analysis, the entire monetary expense during the PFS time was ₹1581964 with ibrutinib, ₹171434 with B-R, and ₹91997 with RClb treatment arm. Pooled PFS and QALY gain was 10.33 and 8.28 years for ibrutinib, 4.08 and 3.53 years for the B-R regimen, and 1.33 and 1.23 years in RClb arms, respectively. Ibrutinib's ICER and ICUR were ₹214587.32 per PFS year gain and ₹282384.86 per QALY gain when assessed against the B-R regimen. Ibrutinib also performed better in ICER and ICUR against the RClb arm with ₹157014.29 per PFS year gain and ₹200413.6 per QALY gain. In conclusion, generic ibrutinib is a cost-effective initial line of management compared to other commonly used treatment regimes in resource-limited settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37439892
doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05342-y
pii: 10.1007/s00277-023-05342-y
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3125-3132

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Yao Y, Lin X, Li F, Jin J, Wang H (2022) The global burden and attributable risk factors of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019: analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2019. Biomed Eng Online 21(1):4
doi: 10.1186/s12938-021-00973-6 pmcid: 8753864
Tejaswi V, Lad DP, Jindal N, Prakash G, Malhotra P, Khadwal A et al (2020) Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: real-world data from India. JCO Glob Oncol 6:866–872
doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00032
Todorovic Z, Todorovic D, Markovic V, Ladjevac N, Zdravkovic N, Djurdjevic P et al (2022) CAR T cell therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: successes and shortcomings. Curr Oncol 29(5):3647–3657
doi: 10.3390/curroncol29050293 pmcid: 9139644
Angell BJ, Prinja S, Gupt A, Jha V, Jan S (2019) The Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana and the path to universal health coverage in India: overcoming the challenges of stewardship and governance. PLoS Med 16(3):e1002759
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002759 pmcid: 6405049
Sriee GVVP, Maiya GR (2021) Coverage, utilization, and impact of Ayushman Bharat scheme among the rural field practice area of Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai. J Family Med Prim Care 10(3):1171–1176
doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1789_20
Youron P, Singh C, Jindal N, Malhotra P, Khadwal A, Jain A et al (2020) Quality of life in patients of chronic lymphocytic leukemia using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CLL17 questionnaire. Eur J Haematol 105(6):755–762
doi: 10.1111/ejh.13503
Singh C, Jindal N, Youron P, Malhotra P, Prakash G, Khadwal A et al (2021) Efficacy, safety, and quality of life of generic and innovator ibrutinib in Indian CLL patients. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 37(2):313–317
doi: 10.1007/s12288-020-01378-6
Burger JA, Barr PM, Robak T, Owen C, Ghia P, Tedeschi A et al (2020) Long-term efficacy and safety of first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with CLL/SLL: 5 years of follow-up from the phase 3 RESONATE-2 study. Leukemia. 34(3):787–798
doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0602-x
Eichhorst B, Fink AM, Bahlo J, Busch R, Kovacs G, Maurer C et al (2016) First-line chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine and rituximab versus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL10): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 17(7):928–942
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30051-1
Goede V, Fischer K, Busch R, Engelke A, Eichhorst B, Wendtner CM et al (2014) Obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med 370(12):1101–1110
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1313984
India GDP per capita (2021) StatisticsTimes.com [Internet]. [Cited 2023 Apr 27].   https://statisticstimes.com/economy/country/india-gdp-per-capita.php
Blankart CR, Koch T, Linder R, Verheyen F, Schreyögg J, Stargardt T (2013) Cost of illness and economic burden of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 20(8):32
doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-32
Huang Q, Emond B, Lafeuille MH, Gupta D, Lefebvre P, Sundaram M et al (2020) Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with first-line ibrutinib compared to chemoimmunotherapy treatment among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Curr Med Res Opin 36(12):2009–2018
doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1835851
Emond B, Sundaram M, Romdhani H, Lefebvre P, Wang S, Mato A (2019) Comparison of time to next treatment, health care resource utilization, and costs in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia initiated on front-line ibrutinib or chemoimmunotherapy. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 19(12):763–775.e2
doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.08.004 pmcid: 8199924
Sathyanarayanan V, Flowers CR, Iyer SP (2020) Comparison of access to novel drugs for lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia between India and the United States. JCO Glob Oncol 6:1124–1133
doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00012
Mikudina B, Goodall M, Adler AI (2017) NICE guidance on ibrutinib for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the presence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation. Lancet Oncol 18(3):289–290
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30062-1
Barnes JI, Divi V, Begaye A, Wong R, Coutre S, Owens DK et al (2018) Cost-effectiveness of ibrutinib as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in older adults without deletion 17p. Blood Adv 2(15):1946–1956
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017015461 pmcid: 6093732
Sinha R, Redekop WK (2018) Cost-effectiveness of ibrutinib compared with obinutuzumab with chlorambucil in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with comorbidities in the United Kingdom. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 18(2):e131–e142
doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.12.005
Alrawashdh N, McBride A, Erstad B, Sweasy J, Persky DO, Abraham I (2022) Cost-effectiveness and economic burden analyses on all first-line treatments of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Value Health 25(10):1685–1695
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.001
Visentin A, Mauro FR, Catania G, Fresa A, Vitale C, Sanna A et al (2022) Obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil versus ibrutinib in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients without TP53 disruptions: a real-life CLL campus study. Front Oncol 21(12):1033413. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1033413 PMID: 36479077; PMCID: PMC9719965
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1033413
Nehra P, Chauhan AS, Malhotra P, Kumar L, Singh A, Gupta N, et al (2023) Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia 13,100201 [Accessed on 20-07-2023 from.  https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lansea/article/PIIS2772-3682(23)00061-6/fulltext ]

Auteurs

Naveen C Hegde (NC)

Department of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

Ankit Kumar (A)

Department of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

Shaweta Kaundal (S)

Department of Clinical Hematology & Medical Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

Lekha Saha (L)

Department of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

Pankaj Malhotra (P)

Department of Clinical Hematology & Medical Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

Shankar Prinja (S)

School of Public Health, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

Deepesh Lad (D)

Department of Clinical Hematology & Medical Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. deepesh.kem@gmail.com.

Amol N Patil (AN)

Department of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. patil.amol@pgimer.edu.in.

Classifications MeSH